If you like #GhostSigns or little crumbs of Cambridge history, you might like this thread. (If not, look away now…)
On the corner of Mill Road and Hope Street in Cambridge, very near my childhood home (where my parents still live), is this building. I’ve walked past it many thousands of times. And running the full length of the wall is a #GhostSign so faint I’ve never noticed it before. ImageImage
For about a century, this was the How family bakery. I remember going there as a kid – if you went at the right time in the morning and hurried home, you could have the joy of eating bread still warm from the oven! Tasty iced buns, too. They closed down around 2000.
These photos of the bakery are from a local nostalgia Facebook group. The first, via Geoff Peters, is probably from the 1970s. The second, dating from around World War I, is via Jane How, who I think is married to a (great-?)grandson of one of those little boys. ImageImage
As a kid, my interest in this wall was for the bubble-gum machines attached to it. But higher up: painted letters. And somehow they caught my eye when I walked past recently. My parents had never noticed them either, so the sign must have been really faded even back in the 1980s. Image
So, what does it say? It took me a while – a few trips to take photos from different angles in different light, then staring at enlarged details – to get it all.

First word is ‘THE’. (And, according to Google Street View from 2014, there’s nothing under the violin-maker’s sign.) ImageImage
The next word is less distinct in parts, but definitely ‘CAMBRIDGE’. Pretty easy to guess after the first three letters. ImageImage
The third word was more of a challenge. It turned out to be ‘PATENT’, although the final T is almost invisible. That’s a bit of an unexpected word to be painted on the side of a bakery. Image
At this point I decided to look for an old Spalding’s street directory, listing local residents and businesses, to get some clues on what kinds of words to look for. I found one from 1913 in the University of Leicester’s online archives, of all places. Image
The 1913 Spalding lists the How property at both 222 Mill Road (‘baker, pastry cook, and confectioner, patent smokeless ovens’) and 1 Hope Street (‘steam and hot air ovens’). So maybe the Hows were involved in selling these ovens as well. ImageImage
Armed with that knowledge, I figured that the next word must be ‘SMOKELESS’. You can just make out most of the SMOK, but then the ELE is pretty much gone. The SS at the end is more distinct. ImageImage
Next we have ‘STEAM & HOT’. It took me far too long to realise that the single character made of curves had to be an ampersand. ImageImage
Then there’s a block of new brickwork (and another further along). At first I thought this would scupper things, but actually I suspect that what used to be there wasn’t old brickwork but floor-length shutters, probably for loading. And that means we’re not missing any writing. ImageImage
After the first new brickwork we have ‘AIR’ (which makes perfect sense following ‘HOT’) and then ‘OVENS’. I get the feeling that the sign painter was starting to stretch the words out to fit the space. ImageImage
Finally, after another block of new bricks, ‘BAKERY’. Image
I give you:

THE CAMBRIDGE PATENT SMOKELESS STEAM & HOT AIR OVENS BAKERY

Similar text to the 1913 Spalding, so perhaps of similar age. Old Edward J. How must have been very proud of his high-tech baking methods. Still, it's quite a mouthful. Like the bread... #GhostSigns

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Freeman

Tom Freeman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SnoozeInBrief

Sep 30, 2021
After 16½ years of editing, writing and drinking coffee [poss ambiguity: were you editing and writing the coffee?] [shut up] at Wellcome, today is my last day. I’ll miss all my lovely colleagues who’ve made my time there such fun.
I’m going to have a few months off the employment treadmill so that I can watch TV and tweet angry nonsense, or, as we middle-class graduates say, “take a sabbatical”. I might even try writing something a bit more substantial.
But first, here’s a thread of 16½ things I’ve learned in the last 16½ years as a professional sentence wrangler:
Read 21 tweets
Apr 19, 2019
One out foraging, one at home resting (noisy geese permitting).
The swans have been nesting for weeks, with one of them making trips out for food. Then yesterday I saw them both out on the canal – but no sign of any cygnets. They looked kind of downcast…
...but then I noticed something.
Read 109 tweets
Feb 23, 2019
Jeremy Corbyn, who didn’t notice the antisemitism in Holocaust denier Paul Eisen.
Jeremy Corbyn, who didn’t notice the antisemitism in Holocaust denier Stephen Sizer.
Jeremy Corbyn, who didn’t notice the antisemitism in Raed Salah, promoter of the blood libel and the conspiracy theory that Jews were behind 9/11.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 14, 2019
A thread about the 1010-day period from 23 June 2016 to 29 March 2019:
Day 1 of 1010: Referendum takes place. 52% vote to leave the EU.

Day 21 of 1010: Theresa May takes over from David Cameron as Prime Minister.
Day 37 of 1010: The government begins its legal fight to avoid needing parliamentary approval for the triggering of Article 50.

Day 216 of 1010: The government loses its legal fight to avoid needing parliamentary approval for the triggering of Article 50.
Read 26 tweets
Jul 4, 2018
Let’s imagine, hypothetically – just for argument’s sake – that the Leave campaign did break electoral law. Apart from prosecutions and fines, what should happen as a consequence of that? 1/13 (yes, 13, sorry)
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
If an MP breaks the law to get elected, the result can be annulled: they lose their seat and the voters get a by-election. But a referendum result isn’t a person, doesn’t hold an elected post, and can’t be held accountable. 2/13
There’s no equivalent law for annulling referendum results – partly because the referendum was, as the #FPBE crowd love to say, “advisory”. It has no legal force, so there’s nothing to annul. It has always been entirely up to MPs whether they implement the result. 3/13
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(