I like looking in dnf countme data to see the various distros requesting EPEL repos. There are often many weird distro names showing up in the single digits. But this one jumped out at me with 38 hits last week:
807530 - CentOS Linux
243165 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux
72903 - CentOS Stream
38521 - AlmaLinux
27647 - Rocky Linux
23133 - Oracle Linux Server
3185 - CloudLinux
112 - Springdale Open Enterprise Linux
111 - Virtuozzo Linux
38 - SUSE Liberty Linux
36 - RedHawk Linux
28 - EuroLinux
23 - Anolis OS
23 - BigCloud Enterprise Linux
22 - Syneto Juno
10 - Mageia
9 - ProLinux
9 - MIRACLE LINUX
9 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server
7 - PitBull Foundation
7 - NetsweeperOS
6 - Navy Linux Enterprise 8.4r1
5 - Linux OS
5 - Virtuozzo
5 - VzB GSB Linux
4 - Asianux Server
4 - Circle Linux
4 - MatrixOS
3 - CCLinux
3 - Virtuozzo Hybrid Server
3 - Centos
3 - OstiliOS Linux
3 - Foobar Linux
2 - Centos Linux
2 - Navy Linux Enterprise
2 - CentOS CAPS-OS
2 - Distributed Deception System
1 - Cent-OS Linux
1 - CentOS Release
1 - Oracle Linux
1 - SiemOS Linux
1 - CentOS Linux Stream
1 - Welcome QS-WSM!
1 - CentOS
1 - MIV Terminals Management
1 - Indocker Linux
1 - Nube de Virtualizaci\xc3\xb3n Privada
1 - CentOS Linux 7
1 - TeknologIT Linux
I'll note that these numbers are generated from me taking the raw data, and filtering for:
That filtering is needed because without it you'll see weird mistakes like people adding EPEL8 to CentOS 7.
I've been playing around with matplotlib to chart this data over time. Due to the difference in scale it's necessary to split into different ranges. The "Liberty" systems started showing up in August, with a high of 79 systems the week of 2021-09-06 to 2021-09-12.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"With CentOS upstream it’s probably net-neutral from a value perspective. It will lower RHEL development costs, but incur sales costs. That’s better than a net loss."
"Also, remember, when you run something for $0, you take full and complete responsibility for it."
It has been a wild two days. I'm not going to defend the decision to end CentOS Linux 8 (CL8) early, but I do want to correct some of the FUD around CentOS Stream 8 (CS8). 1/7
"I'm switching to Ubuntu because CS8 is too different from CL8."
By all means use whichever distro works for you. But if you think CS8 is "too different", then you are in for a rude awakening by switching to a completely different distro. 2/7
"I can't use CS8 because it isn't stable."
Red Hat has a vested interest in it being stable, because it contains the fixes and enhancements that are planned for the next RHEL8 minor release. Any pain inflicted on CS8 users could affect RHEL8 customers a few months later. 3/7