THREAD:Let's walk through secretive drive late last year by a small group of religious activists who teamed up with Trump & Republican state AGs to try to overturn presidential election. Start off with Mike Farris, from the anti-gay rights/anti abortion Alliance Defending Freedom
Farris in the above email is sending a draft of the complaint that Texas AG Ken Paxton would about a week later file with the United States Supreme Court. For now, Farris is pitching South Carolina AG Alan Wilson. Will take just about any GOP AG. So he leaves state name blank
SC AG Wilson talks to Farris abt proposed lawsuit. "We have been having constant conversations with other state AGs and state AG staffs" But Wilson has issues with it, which he details in an email to another conservative activist, the author Don Brown. So Farris has to move on.
Another key player in the "State v State project," as they call it, is "CJ Martin"/Mark D. Martin, former chief justice of N.C. Supreme Court, now Dean of Regent University Law, the religious school where students live out their "Christian worldview with intentionality."
These religious conservatives want South Carolina AG Wilson to take the lead--Texas AG Paxton is facing a criminal investigation himself. But Wilson has reservations. While "Texas is warming up to maybe jumping on board."
Paxton moves ahead and files the lawsuit, expanding on the arguments sketched out in the brief Mike Farris had been shopping around. Compare the opening lines. First is Farris draft. Second is actual filing by AG Paxton of Texas with US Supreme Court. See anything similar?
Here is the funny thing. Mike Farris in 2016 urged his followers to vote against Trump.
But that was before Trump moved to fill the Supreme Court with nominees that Mike Farris approved of. In fact, Farris was at the White House when Trump nominated Amy Comey Barrett
Controlling the Supreme Court---that seems to be a key to many of these folks--and a part of what so motivated them to help Trump get a second term. Farris makes this clear in his many social media postings, as he turns to the court to combat LGBT rights and abortion.
So that is a bit of background on origins of that odd lawsuit Texas AG Paxton filed in Dec 2020 to try to overturn the election of President Joe Biden. The Supreme Court, of course, rejected the move. (Farris was "deeply disappointed") But this is still part of that history.
Thanks again to @WesternJon and his politics students at Mount Holyoke and to @bymarkwalker. Together we did FOIAs around the United States of Republican AGs to get visibility into this maneuver.
READ THE STORY: One of nation’s most prominent Christian conservative lawyers played a critical behind-the-scenes role in the lawsuit the Texas AG filed in December in an effort to overturn the election of President Biden, documents obtained via FOIA show nytimes.com/2021/10/07/us/…
Also, FYI, the story has links to many other documents we got via FOIA detailing this effort to subvert democracy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TREAD: Let's walk through secretive drive late last year by a small group of religious activists who teamed up with Trump & Republican state AGs to try to overturn presidential election. Start off with Mike Farris, from the anti-gay rights/anti abortion Alliance Defending Freedom
Farris in the above email is sending a draft of the complaint that Texas AG Ken Paxton would about a week later file with the United States Supreme Court. For now, Farris is pitching South Carolina AG Alan Wilson. Will take just about any GOP AG. So he leaves state name blank
SC AG Wilson talks to Farris abt proposed lawsuit. "We have been having constant conversations with other state AGs and state AG staffs" But Wilson has issues with it, which he details in an email to another conservative activist, the author Don Brown. So Farris has to move on.
Photos of the dinner reviewed by POLITICO show Odom posing for selfies with attendees. Several photos showed Lewandowski just above her right shoulder, with his tongue sticking out of his mouth. @politicoalex
Mr. Lewandowski tried to hold her hand, and she pushed his hand away. He touched her leg, she moved it away. He grabbed her napkin off her lap and tried to touch her leg again, and she pulled her dress over her leg, to move his hand away and cover her skin,” Odom’s attorney said
THREAD: To those who consider cryptocurrency hard to understand & aren't paying attention. Time to rethink. Bitcoin may seem speculative--and yes, it is. But global financial system is being revolutionized. Nature of $$ is transforming. This is a BIG deal nytimes.com/2021/09/23/us/…
The US government increasingly recognizes this. As the global value of cryptocurrency booms, regulators in the United States are rushing to create the first major new rules governing this virtual currency--a push that will start with so-called stablecoins. nytimes.com/2021/09/17/bus…
A lobbying frenzy is underway in Washington as the cryptocurrency industry knows that a major set of new federal rules will soon be imposed to regulate so-called stablecoins--and industry players want to shape how the rules are written.
Does this include a hard but perhaps necessary debate over whether Grand Isle (at least as this barrier island previously existed) should be rebuilt? (It is a narrow thread of land that sticks out into Gulf of Mexico and has been repeatedly devastated and rebuilt)
This is a topic we at The NYT have written about extensively over the last five years dating back to March 2017 when Scott Pruitt rejected a ban on this pesticide. This is one of many illustrations of this old saying: Elections have consequences. nytimes.com/2017/03/29/us/…
Here is a deep look at the topic by @JohnBranchNYT and me from 2018. Trump's "distrust of expert studies and advice has put farm workers at risk in Kern County, Calif., where a pesticide the Obama administration moved to ban is still in widespread use." nytimes.com/interactive/20…
READING THIS CONSENT DECREE IN DETAIL re cryptocurrency exchange pioneer BitMEX and its perpetual swap. Pretty extraordinary what BitMEX this week agreed to, in addition to paying a $100 million civil monetary penalty. Yes, one Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000)
BitMEX from no later than November 2014 through at least October 1, 2020, operated an illegal derivatives trading platform that solicited business from US-based customers.
BitMEX solicited orders from U.S.-based customers for futures, options, and swaps through its website and on social media/U.S. customers were able to access the BitMEX platform from the U.S, EVEN THOUGH BitMEX never registering with the CFTC