In 1860, the South democratically seceded from the US. The South felt oppressed due to the US not respecting their ethnic ideals & traditional way of life.

Instead of respecting democratic freedoms, Lincoln obliterated the rebellion as his troops committed horrid atrocities.
Ofc a ridiculous narrative that is routinely used in Kashmir where religious (& racial) supremacists purged the land of non-Muslims claiming it as their birthright. Meanwhile renaming Kashmiri sites & cities into Arabic & Persian & smashing the temples of their ancestors.
India has not even shown 1/20th of the ferocity the US & other nations have shown when it comes to secessionist elements

Gandhian tolerance & Nehruvian romance have won out instead of Lalitadityan ambition (Kashmir's greatest King who most of them probably don't even recognize)
As white supremacy was to the Confederates, Islamic supremacy is to the Kashmiris.

As slavery was to the South, ethnic cleansing is to Kashmir.

As both are united by supremacy-based secession, both will again be united in the same fate of failure in the end.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Emissary

The Emissary Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheEmissaryCo

2 Oct
Something that I can’t wrap my head around is now on earth Ambedkar thought that Buddhism was a religion centered on social justice.

Hot take but Lord Buddha endorsed jati-varna/caste more then Lord Ram or Lord Krishna ever did.

🧵Thread🪡
Across various sutras, Lord Buddha explicitly endorses the 4 fold varna system. Emphasis is placed on Brahmin and Kshatriya castes as respected communities and the castes where Buddha’s and Bodhisattvas are born into (All Buddhas thus far were born in Brahmin/Kshatriya lineages).
Jati especially is endorsed as birth based and it seems that in some ways, jati/varna are used interchangeably interestingly enough.

The passage below clearly shows how caste-conscious and conformist Indian/Buddhist society was during Lord Buddha’s time.
Read 10 tweets
2 Oct
"There is no power on Earth that can undo Pakistan" - Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah

🧵 on Creating a New Medina by Venkat Dhulipala.

The political & ideological formulation of Pakistan & how the seeds of its creation lead to the rot of the present.
We start off with a legendary séance with the ghost of Jinnah who bemoans the state of Pakistan. As well as challenges to the idea of Jinnah being secular. The idea of Pakistan was founded on anti-Indianness & Islamic separateness/supremacy

The GOI Act of 1935 where the British tried to prop up regional chauvinism and provincial emotions to break the central revolution of Indian independence.

A mirror of the regional supremacist movements in India today who are detriment to the country

Read 9 tweets
1 Oct
Delving through the prequel of the partition, it becomes clear how much of a team & multi-pronged effort the creation of Pakistan was.

One of the most understated prongs is Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanawi.

It is Thanawi's war with Husain Ahmad Madani that tips the Ulema to Pakistan
Maulana Madani was part of a loud minority of Muslim leadership who argued for unity with Hindus to create an independent & united India.

Thanawi was initially wary of the Muslim League, but the rise of a "too Hindu" Congress changed his mind.

Thanawi noticed the closeness of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, an organization of prominent Deobandi scholars with the Congress, & sought instead to forge the JUH with the ML.

He sent questionnaires to both to inquire their goals. Nawab Ismail Khan of the ML, answered his questions.
Read 9 tweets
13 Sep
The National Agriculturist Party began as a loose coalition of landlords, both Hindu & Muslim in the run up to the 1937 United Province elections (modern day Uttar Pradesh).

The tale of the NAP reveals the role of provincial panchayat level squabbling in the Partition
One of the NAP’s prominent leaders was the Nawab of Chhattari, Muhammad Ahmed Said Khan.

A frenemy of Jinnah’s, he parted ways with the Muslim League in a quest for power, believing economic interests would defeat communal interests (he still agreed with Jinnah’s supremacy.)
The NAP compromised of Muslim & Hindu Zamindars, landlords who believed they could strong arm their subjects no matter the religion in a battle against land reform (very familiar huh?).

They collapsed in slow motion once communal & economic realities hit them.
Read 6 tweets
12 Sep
Of all the things I observe in 🇮🇳 politics, nothing takes the cake more than people praising leaders who denied the divinity of Lord Ram, murdered sadhus en masse, & nakedly sold the country/souls to foreign powers/missionaries simply because those leaders are of the same caste.
There is so much legitimate critique of the BJP. They should indeed dilute that horrid SC/ST act. They should leave most traditional religious practices alone, instead of going on social engineering experiments. They should fulfill their 303 mandate.
But switching to virulently anti-Hindu opposition due to caste pride? The same opposition that has promised reservation in the private sector? That butchers Hindus in a holy land like Bengal? The same people who opposed Ram Mandir which the BJP made a reality?

Myopic malaise.
Read 4 tweets
10 Aug
In an Indian leftist CH room & the speakers are competing over who takes more anti-psychotic drugs LMFAO

The genesis of this is that a girl’s mental health state was triggered by another speaker’s comments & attempt to cancel her

Another speaker has labeled all this problematic
There is now a war over pronouns. A speaker has labeled another as a woman. The labeled person has taken umbrage with this and sharply corrects the speaker that she is non-binary

Another speaker has pointed out that the labeled person has pronouns they/she so saying woman is ok
However, the non-binary person has dug their heels in & challenged the person over their feminist credentials

They are now debating over the origin of their theoretical praxis. There is a massive war over the misgendering with a menagerie of South Bombay Hindi & forced English..
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(