In the year 2000 the average woman barrister earned 61% of the earnings of the average male barrister. In the year 2020 the equivalent figure was still 61% (barcouncil.org.uk/uploads/assets…). Image
The reasons for this include: women being pushed into lower earning areas of practice, the average women barrister being more junior than the average man (because the Bar is poor at retaining women after they have children)...
(theoretically) more women working part time (although I can't imagine the effects are significant), a client led preference for men, and a failure on the part of some Chambers to take a sufficient interest in what their clerking produces.
When I sat on the Retention (of Women) Sub-Committee of the Equality and Diversity Committee of the Bar Council back in the day there was a real reluctance to publish these figures. So there has been progress on that at least - but there is so much more to do.
(For the avoidance of doubt, the reluctance, as I recall, was an institutional reluctance not one of the Committee or Sub-Committee.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

9 Oct
Imagine living in a country where the police took an interest in Government corruption.

🤔 @UKSFO. on.ft.com/2WXIZ13
You'd think a £100m transaction at a c.£45m overvalue where the Accounting Officer was misled and there were payments of £16m to a politically connected bagman and Priti Patel was falling over herself to help would merit a passing glance? Wouldn't you, @UKSFO?
I referred the above to @UKSFO - with all the evidence in writing - more than three months ago. Have they called? Have they emailed? Reader, they have not. Ghosted.
Read 4 tweets
6 Oct
Not hugely surprising. Really quite grim. theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/…
Who could possibly have guessed this transaction would not turn out well?
Yep, they reported it to SOCA. Would like to see that report.
Read 4 tweets
5 Oct
So Priti Patel has announced an Inquiry following the tragic murder of Sarah Everard. THREAD
It won't initially be a statutory inquiry - apparently for reasons of urgency - but can be converted into one. I don't find that rationale that persuasive but what you call it is less important than who Chairs it and what its powers and terms of reference are.
The Chair will be confirmed in due course. So will the terms of reference although we have something of a steer...
Read 13 tweets
3 Oct
I see Nick Cohen is again complaining in one of his newspaper columns about the cancellation of transphobes.
Barely a day passes in which one national newspaper or another does not carry a piece decrying how trans people have rendered voiceless the writer or their friends.
Meanwhile, when @GoodLawProject brings litigation asserting that trans people too are entitled to benefit from the foundational NHS promise of universal healthcare there is literally not one national newspaper we trust to carry the story fairly.
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
"The pandemic was lucky for some – even those supplying facemasks the NHS couldn't use. One can only guess how large a fortune Andrew Mills made – he has changed the status of his companies so that we can't see how much public money went into his pocket.” opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-…
A reminder that civil servants were worried about the consequences of not giving Andrew Mills a contract because he was an advisor to @trussliz.
A reminder that the Department of Health didn't consider conflicts of interest before giving Ayanda a £252m contract. nao.org.uk/press-release/…
Read 6 tweets
29 Sep
Rosie Duffield is here, at best ignorantly and at worst dishonestly, spreading harmful falsehoods about trans healthcare. No one "so young" gets surgery. You can't have it in the UK as a child.

This is dangerous and harmful propaganda.
Twitter is a hostile place for all and women suffer more than men. I don't invite threats against anyone. But this gross misrepresentation of reality causes real harm to a beseiged and vulnerable community. It has to be described clearly as what is: a harmful falsehood.
You can't pretend to be a good faith participant in this discussion, you can't pretend to care about the lives of trans people, and stand by silently whilst someone in a position of notional authority, an MP, actively spreads damaging falsehoods.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(