Nick Triggle did his version of the article @martinmckee & I wrote in the Guardian about how UK has much higher case rates (& death rates) than West & North Europe...
Of course there are different views, but here are some areas I see differently... 1/9
That Europe is doing "vaccine plus" - high vax coverage and some measures such as masks indoors, school mitigations, covid passports is the entire point- it works much better than "vaccine just" in keeping cases (and all their bad consequences) down
And... 2/9
not clear that contact rates are higher here than in Europe - contacts in Europe are SAFER because they've take additional precautions.
In fact SAGE says we are still not close to pre pandemic contact rates in England. Many do not feel able to "be normal" due to high cases. 3/9
The gap in deaths is lower than the gap in cases - but that is partly reflecting higher cases in Europe a month or so ago but deaths are still quite a lot higher here than there.
The flu analogy isn't quite right as Martin explained here:
Long Covid *is* a real concern - the recent paper comparing it to flu showed it's 50% more common after Covid than flu. AND covid cases are WAY higher than flu.
We are already seeing the impact of summer cases on increases in long covid in England - particularly the young. 5/9
Nick - rightly - says there needs to be a debate about what is an "acceptable" level of Covid. I def agree. But we're not having that debate! Instead the narrative is that where we is fine and inevitable.
Our article was raising other options. Let's have the debate! 6/9
All of Europe inc UK is almost 100% Delta. Variants are not behind current differences and it's not that the UK surge will inevitably move to Europe. The difference between us is policy.
Also - many of us are concerned about high Covid rates in children *for children*. 7/9
We might see falling cases soon as boosters, teen vax and immunity from high infection have an effect - but at the cost of hundreds of thousands more infections & their consequences before then vs what we could have had.
I def agree with Nick that NHS is in tricky position. 8/9
Finally - Nick has a little dig at us "self-appointed group of experts". We are an independent group and we are also experts. Esp @martinmckee is a world leading public health academic - advising govts all over world & WHO + president elect of BMA. I'm lucky to work with him. 9/9
The pandemic is as bad as it ever was for babies - in year to Aug 2023, 6,300 babies under 1 were admitted to hospital wholly or partly BECAUSE of Covid.
They are ONLY age group where admissions have NOT gone down over time 1/17
Our study, led by Prof @katebrown220, looked at all hospitalisations in England in children with a Covid diagnosis or positive test from Aug 2020-Aug 2023.
We then *excluded* all admissions where a Covid diagnosis was incidental (ie not why they were in hospital)
2/17
Infants (babies under 1) are generally at higher risk from respiratory infections, plus they are the age group that, if infected, are overwhelmingly meeting the virus for the first time.
They are not vaccinated and have not had it before. 3/17
Prof @Kevin_Fong giving the most devastating and moving testimony to the Covid Inquiry of visiting hospital intensive care units at the height of the second wave in late Dec 2020.
The unimaginable scale of death, the trauma, the loss of hope.
Please watch this 2min clip.
And here he breaks down while explaining the absolute trauma experienced by smaller hospitals in particular - the "healthier" ICU patients were transferred out, leaving them coping with so much death.
They felt so alone.
Here Prof Fong explains how every nurse he met was traumatised by watching patients die, being only able to hold up ipads to their relatives and how it went against their normal practice of trying to ensure a dignified death, with family there.
🧵War causes direct civilian deaths but also indirect deaths over the following years.
Recent paper estimates eventual total direct & indirect deaths in Gaza attributable to the war - 10% of entire pop'n.
I want to explain these estimates and why deaths must be counted. 1/13
Why count casualties from war anyway? For moral, legal and strategic reasons.
1 - owe it to those who have died
2 - International law says must count & identify dead as far as possible
3 - monitor progress of war & learn from tactics
2/13
There are direct and indirect casualties of war. Direct deaths include those who killed by fighting or bombs.
Indirect deaths are those that die when they would otherwise have lived because of one or more of: lack of food, healthcare, housing, sanitation, income, hope. 3/13
THREAD: the summer Covid wave in the UK continues.
Basically, there is a LOT of Covid around and not a lot of other respiratory viruses.
If you have cold or flu symptoms, it's probably Covid.
The latest hospital data from England shows steady, quite high levels. 1/8
But admissions don't tell us how much virus is circulating more generally. The best (but imperfect) measure we have is wasterwater measurements, and only in Scotland and not England.
Scotland's wastewater is showing a huge July peak - highest since Omicron's 1st yr in 2022 2/8
Because different people shed different amounts of virus and variants can matter too, you can't for sure infer how many people were infected between different wasterwater peaks. BUT given the size, I'd say it's pretty likely this is the largest peak since 2022 in Scotland 3/8