Lazarus Long Profile picture
Oct 10, 2021 23 tweets 10 min read Read on X
@AHS_media
CC: @AntibioticDoc @CMOH_Alberta

Allowing KNOWN CoVid positive people into a maternity Ward is a very bad idea.

You will get sued.

You will lose.
Your opening argument is a horrible one.

'It's been in place for a while, so because we've never been called on it, that makes it ok.'

You need to hire a PR person, because the optics on that alone?

Wow.

Moving on. You care about the pregnant person Image
needing support, because it's just them right?

Let's bring in @CiannaLyon - two weeks from term, and TERRIFIED of your hospital system.

Why?

Her words: Image
"Trust the system"...or your protocols. What are they, again? Image
Blah, blah, masks.

Great, right?

Wrong. Image
The supplied masks are procedure masks.

Oh, and what caught my eye? They might not have to wear a mask?

Exceptions like a rabid antimasking antivaxxer proclaiming they can't breathe in a procedure mask? Image
Like these AHS procedure masks that 150 doctors submitted a petition because they were of such inferior quality?

globalnews.ca/news/6921421/a…

But, surely, that's been resolved, right?

Moving on again. That article had a very interesting tidbit about PriMed, Image
the largest mask supplier in Canada.

What does PriMed say about the masks you want CoVid coughing folks stumbling around in the shared rooms? Shared elevators. Shared bathrooms. Shared cafeteria where the mask comes off to eat.

primed.ca/resources/astm…

Procedure masks are not Image
to be used for airborne contaminants like TB or SARS?

But that's surely not SARS-COV-2, right?

who.int/news-room/q-a-…

Oh. Aerosols.

So, your procedure mask PROVIDER specifically says to NOT use procedure masks to protect against airborne contaminants - aerosols. Image
Is that all?

No.

Pregnant Albertan women - you should file a class action lawsuit.

This thread, no matter how indemnifying, will result in nothing except notifying you of the deliberate exposure to CoVid.

Mom and Dad waiting at home-breakthrough cases happen all the time.
Because, as a pregnant woman you are particularly at risk.

Pregnancy makes you breathless, right?

It's because you are breathing for two, and so you are actually breathing in 30 to 35% more volume of air.

google.com/url?sa=t&sourc…
And when you go into labor?

40 to 60% more on top of that.

When you breathe in more, you have more opportunities to encounter a virusol.

And will you be wearing a mask during labor as you are sucking in huge amounts of air?

clinicalgate.com/respiratory-sy…
With Delta producing 1,260 times more viral load than Alpha?

I'm sorry if you are scared. If I were pregnant, I'd be calling my lawyer & a reporter.

But make sure they talk to an aerosol scientist, because the Alberta Healthcare System does not have your back.
(Speaking of back, @AHS_media, I have backed up all of the sources, so do please delete them to show consciousness of guilt :) ).
A couple of folks have DM'd me about why this thread.

Because of this:


As I watched the ideas roll in, it just struck me as completely insane that this was necessary when AHS has a perfectly capable IPC group.

If they weren't being hamstrung by,
their leadership.

Is it hubris? The cost of real PPE?

Lord knows it's not the evidence.

WHO clearly says it is transmitted via aerosols. Their PPE provider clearly says surgical masks are not to be used for aerosol protection.

They are clearly
allowing CoVid positive people into a maternity ward.

They can wordsmith 'exception' all they want.

They cannot wordsmith away clear legal liability.

It's a shame that it has to be phrased that way.

If they truly cared about people, they'd have everyone in N95's.
Here is the AHS Patient First Proclamation.

albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/pf…

A proclamation, like a declaration, is simply that - if there is no action behind it.

AHS's patients AND HCW's are yelling for help.

Is anyone listening? Image
Thank you to @CMarieHs for pointing out that Twitter has chomped the Google amp link on the tweet re: 30 to 35% more volume above:


Direct source:

emedicine.medscape.com/article/303852….

Thank you,@CMarieHs !! Image
@AHS_media @CMOH_Alberta

If I was pregnant and headed into the AHS, I would be sure to get multiple tests before going in.

Because if you test negative, go in, and get CoVid thanks to Surgical Mask Hills - oops, FootHills based policy?

You'll have a darn good lawsuit,
due to leadership holding IPC back from controlling and preventing infections.

Because neonatals have worse outcomes if Mom has CoVid.

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…

And Mom gets symptomatic quickly? Entirely possible with Delta.

Even worse.

Does AHS's lawyers know this Image
game of "hubris chicken" they are playing?

Does their board?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lazarus Long

Lazarus Long Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LazarusLong13

May 20
Speaking of silly, can we agree that the WHO has Ebola experts?

Let's talk about PPE, and a bias towards "less PPE is better." Image
The WHO EBOLA IPC guidance:


Foreshadow on PPE

"...due to the desirability of an off-
the-face design, and not for protection from aerosols, respirators may be used instead of medical masks"who.int/publications/i…
If you can stay 3 feet away while screening? No medical mask needed. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
May 10
Great article by @EmilyJoshu here.

Emily, there's another article in this that's even more shocking.

The aerosols from milking have long been discussed by many of us on X.

People like myself, @sri_srikrishna, @AbraarKaran have long advocated for comfortable aerosol
protective gear like PAPRs. But, have been ignored by the USDA who, of course, thought it was only contaminated milking gear like the claw.

But there is one more source of aerosols besides cow breath.

The wastewater. When you spray anything you generate huge amounts of Image
aerosols. And that farm wastewater, filled with milk dumped from being full of H5N1, gets reclaimed and reused.

Those milk and wastewater lagoons are on most dairy farms (my grandfather owned a dairy farm).

And there's something you should know.

Image
Read 15 tweets
May 7
Humanity's hubris vs the precautionary principle.

The virus, ANDV, will do what it will do. Pandemic? History tells us "NO." But history is in the past.

Let me show you what the studies tell us - and why I am livid that the WHO is insisting that surgical masks are ok.

🧵
Incubation time, or how long until symptoms show up?

The high risk time frame is 14–32 days. Not to put too fine a point on that, but that can mean a full month later

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC32…

There have been some out to 8 weeks, but let's ignore those

gov.uk/guidance/andes… Image
Clinical features The most important complication of ANDV infection is HCPS, which is associated with a high mortality rate. Milder illness without significant cardio-respiratory compromise may also be seen. Illness usually develops 2 to 4 weeks following exposure, but incubation periods as early as 4 days and up to 8 weeks have been described.
But, what receptor does the ANDV attach to?

PCDH1 (protocadherin-1) is primarily expressed in the airway epithelium of the respiratory system, especially in the bronchial and nasal epithelial cells, and in pulmonary endothelial cells.

So, that means in the URT and the LRT.
Read 41 tweets
May 6
@mvankerkhove - a follow-up question on today's press conference.

In this bit, you were thanked for being very clear.

But, you said that the medical personnel taking care of those sick would be wearing PPE.

N95s are not PPE. They are Respiratory Protective Equipment. /1
Surgical masks are PPE.

So, is the WHO advising them to wear surgical masks or N95s/FFP2/KF94/KN95 (respirators)?

Second followup, @mvankerkhove, you referred to "really close contacts"

Close contacts are defined by the WHO as within 3 feet.
Cases 1 & 2 were close contacts.

How did the other cases get it? I realize you cannot possibly have an answer...but you are labeling this as "really close contact" for those cases - as well.

Staterooms are typical 2 person rooms.

It doesn't add up. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 26
I've become a bit of a Dental Nerd after just getting savaged by avoiding the dentist due to COVID.

But, now, I have a Dental Nasal PAPR, know all about Stephan's Curve, use a waterpik, Oral-B iO Series 10, chew 8 pieces of xylitol gum - and the dentist just said that.....
He has never seen anyone reverse course so perfectly before.

"Immaculate."

And bonus...I ran into a fellow masker in his lobby!!

She had never heard of Readimask, so I was super happy to share the Good Word with her.

Sharing the Good Word - not COVID!
Read 4 tweets
Mar 16
Now, this is a very interesting PREPRINT.

We've all heard that shingles vaccination reduces risk of Alzheimer's.

And we all know that Covid increases the risk of Alzheimer's by 50-80%.

What happens when you mix them? Will the vaccination offset a different disease?

/1 Opposing effects of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection and recombinant zoster vaccination on the risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease  View ORCID ProfileCarly M. Rose, Shiying Liu,  View ORCID ProfileWilliam S. Bush, Jonathan L. Haines, Scott M. Williams,  View ORCID ProfileDana C. Crawford N3C Consortium doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.21.26344555 This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Yes.

But by how much? Conclusions and Relevance SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection and recombinant zoster vaccination are modifiable risk factors for LOAD among older individuals, with a modestly significant interaction between the two. Recombinant zoster vaccination reduced LOAD risk regardless of sex and race, though the protection is greater in those without documented COVID-19 infection. Recombinant zoster vaccination and reduced exposure to COVID-19 infection in the later decades of life reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer disease over at least a five-year period.
Useful for below - "Late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD; onset age ≥65)"

"odds of LOAD are 16% higher among those with at least one reported COVID-19 infection" Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(