A LATE ANALYSIS OF LIVERPOOL MAN CITY:
A potentially key match in the title picture, this was a battle that showcased Pep and Klopp at their very best, making numerous ingame tactical tweaks to turn the tide.
DISCLAIMER: APOLOGIES FOR VIDEO QUALITY, SEEMS TO BE A METTRICA ISSUE,
Both Liverpool and Man City had issues while pressing from a structural perspective, resulting in them losing the control of the game before tweaking mid game.
In this thread we will look at 1. The line ups 2. The initial set ups 3. The issues with those set ups 4. The changes
1. Line ups:
Both teams lined up in their usual 4-3-3’s. Liverpool had Jota up front and Milner took the place of TAA who was unavailable.
City lined up with Foden and Jesus on either wing and Grealish up front, unlike the game in midweek vs PSG where Sterling and Mahrez featured
2. The initial Set ups:
Liverpool played with their usual 4-3-3 in relation to line up and structure. They typically involved Fabinho+1 8 in build up and did so, with that 8 usually Curtis.
Liverpool would then keep Mo salad and Sadio Mane higher up to pin the CITY fbs back.
City had a 4-3-3 press akin to Liverpool’s normal 4-3-3, with Grealish marking Fabinho and Foden and Jesus making curved pressing runs to the CB’s while cutting off passes to the FB’s.
City defended in a 4-5-1 mid block, with Grealish staying near Fabinho.
City built with a normal 4-3-3. Fb’s wide, kdb and silva higher up but looking to drop to receive, them+ Grealish gave CITY 3 options Btl.
LIV had a 4-3-3 off the ball shape, it was the 9s duty, to press the cb.
NOTE: Mane wide to cover FB, Curtis narrow (imp. for later)
3. System Flaws:
Now, Liverpools off the ball structure was flawed and this Interview from Jurgen Klopp perfectly highlighted it.
Liverpool struggled to deal with City BTL, which meant that Henderson and Curtis were unsure of when to press.
This meant that the 9 of Liverpool’s press was consistently 1v2 and Hendo & Curtis were perennially unsure. They left City’s Cbs and Fbs with a lot of time and space on the ball due to worry of the 3 BTL options behind them.
Liverpool had massive issues at cutting off the Half spaces, with Laporte and Dias able to easily play through the lines. City had often 3/4 players looking to receive who were allowed to turn and play forward with ease.
Both these issues, as Klopp explained so well, the back four not pushing up to cut off the half spaces.
Klopp emphasises the importance of an aggressive back pushing up to keep the block compact, and thats been a feature of his teams from Dortmund.
LIV didn’t do so, letting City could play through the lines. It also caused them to be too passive and get forced back.
LIV lacked composure, playing dozens and dozens of long balls to Mane off little use.
This was changed at ht with Klopp asking them to “play an extra pass”
City’s press wasn’t flawless, they pressed in a 4-3-3 LIV esque press. Rodri pushed up to press the opp 6, like Fabinho so often does.
However, neither the midfield 3 nor the FBs pushed up to press LIV’s Fb,resulting in the winger being 2v1.
This was easily exploitable, for LIV but wasn’t, mainly due to the second part of Klopp’s interview.. where he talks about not feeling and hence playing right.
Pep changed his press midway through the 1st half, realising that it needed correcting.
They switched to a 4-4-2 press and off the ball shape. KDB pushed up alongside Jack grealish (later Sterling).
This was way more effective with City covering each option and hence exerting greater tactical control.
Klopp changed things up at half time, with Liverpool’s backline being significantly more aggressive in the second half.
Milner, Matip etc. stepped up well to support the press, mitigating the time on the ball that City’s CBs and FBs had first half.
Klopp also made 1 more tweak, with Mane tucking in more forming a psuedo 4-4-2, in order to prevent Dias passing to KDB as Mane now pressed Dias cutting off that pass as well. This also allowed LIV to press Walker, as Curtis could do so.
Guardiola, Not to be outdone, made a tweak of his own with Sterling coming on for Grealish.
Sterling was capable of fulfilling the exact same pressing and BTL role that Grealish did while offering a significantly greater threat in counters and transitions.
ALL IN ALL, this was a fascinating tactical battle which was enhanced by the sublime individuals. It was a match of possibly the 2 best teams in Europe & the 2 best coaches in Europe.
Over the 90 mins, id say City got the better result, but LIV can take a lot from that match
Thank you all for reading this piece.
If u like it, do make sure to Like, rt, qt or just generally share as it would help me a lot.
Do give me any feedback u have too!
Stick around for Pl/Cl related analysis in the future! @threadreaderapp unroll
Check the reply for blog format👇
I should add,
I decided to focus on a couple of the main themes here...
Their was ofcourse detail regarding final third etc. which I chose not to add due to length.
These are just the main tactical themes and tweaks which I thought affected the passage of play the most.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is an issue with this sort off thought process.
In that newcastle have more leverage than every one around them already.
They have a bigger stadium and fan base than most of the clubs in and around them while also having serious money to play with now.
As long as they have good decision makers, they'll fly up the league towards europa spots of the back of that.
Then they also have serious monetary advantages for wages and transfer fees over some of the bigger teams which allows them to grow.
This sort off language was probably used for Man city before they won the league etc.
Look at them now.
Newcastle's owners also have the added advantage of political pressure of wanting to do better than Sheikh mansour's man city
THE FLAWS OF PSG’s 4-3-3:
PSG vs City 2-0 Tactical Analysis
In the Recent CL Group stage clash, Pochettino’s PSG came out on top over Pep’s Man city. However, there were some repetitive flaws in Pochettino’s set up which will be something for Pochettino to resolve.
THREAD📜
In this thread, we will look at
1.the line ups of both teams
2.the on and off the ball tactical set ups
3.flaws in Poch’s set up
4.flaws after Second Half change
NOTE: this is a PSG centric thread.
1. THE LINE UPS:
Both lined up in a 4-3-3.
PSG fielded their deadly trio and 3 second phase midfielders.
Meanwhile, City lined up with two 8/10’s in KDB and Bernardo.
Pep went for Sterling up front who has been in and out of City’s side since KDB came back from injury last szn.
HOW SHOULD CITY BEAT CHELSEA?
Pep’s side played Chelsea under Tuchel on 3 occasions last szn and lost.
In light of their clash today, I had a look at the 2 key issues that City had in the CL Final and what might be done to mitigate them.
BUILD UP ISSUES:
City built up in a 3-1 shape in the Cl final, with walker dropping to make a 3 and Gundogan as a single pivot.
Further forward, city had 3 options between the lines with zinchenko pushing up.
Kdb would hold the lines and could easily interchange with Foden.
The issues was that chelsea’s 5-2-3 midblock with a narrow front 3 meant that Che blocked the pivot easily and forced City wide into the trap.
City struggled to find their btl options and build through the centre.
City’s set up also left CHE’s narrow 3 free to counter.
Vdb didn't do much wrong today.
He also didn't do much wrong vs young boys.
And yet somehow, united would be miles better if he was not playing or was playing further forward with an actual pivot player deeper.
Thts the reality.
He roams too much, which leaves u without passing options deeper.
And leaves u exposed in transition.
A player being good doesn't make the player right for you.
And equally, if a player ain't great for someone else doesn't mean he won't be top for you.
Donny van de beek cannot play in the pivot for me.
He just roams forward and to the wings too much to be considered a good pivot player.
Martial was an issue, but vdb being in the pivot was a bigger issue
The Artful Dodger: A case study on Edinson Cavani.
Match Analysed: Tottenham 1-3 Man Utd
I decided to look at the movement of Edinson Cavani using his performance vs Spurs away, one of his best in a Utd shirt and look at why ole wants him to stay.
In this thread we’ll see:
1.The positions he picks up+ how he stays unmarked
2.favoured runs
3.Corners
4.Him vs the rest
5.Involvement in goals
NOTE: due to character limits, I have used some short forms
1. Positions Picked Up & Method of Staying Unmarked:
Cavani is a CF similar to pre-Pep Aguero. He stays upfront, mostly on the blind side of the opp. CB to the ball. Hence, he is always ready to attack a cross if the play continues down that side.
This is Blindside positioning
DECODING: Aaron Wan Bissaka- Part 2
Man Utd 4-2 Everton
in light of UTD's interest in Trippier, i analysed some of AWB's pre season performances.
This is a breakdown of AWB vs Everton.
AWB played 59 minutes in this match before getting subbed for Dalot.
(note: no audio on clips)
Utd lined up in their familiar 4-2-3-1, with many first teamers like Shaw, Bruno etc. returning from post euro breaks.
VDB interestingly lined up in the double pivot and all though he did push on sometimes, he generally performed a fairly similar function to Scott or Fred
Everton lined up in a 4-2-3-1 ( 4-4-2 block) with James & Gray interchanging in central areas.
Iwobi & Townsend were outwide and they stayed wider by the lines. When they did tuck in, the fullbacks would push up.
*Iwobi played on the left and Townsend right unlike in the graphic