let’s postulate a universe in which magic exists, and has few limitations other than that if you want to do something, you have to know how to do it. so it’s not too hard to cast spells that already exist, but if you want to do something new, you have to design a spell for it
designing spells is tricky, because the universe is complicated and magic doesn’t allow you to just say ‘i want this result’ without filling in the details
if you design a spell quickly and cast your first draft, it might not work at all, or it might not do what you want, or it might have unforeseen side effects

designing spells, in addition to requiring a certain amount of creativity and technical knowledge, is time-consuming
wizards have to carefully check their design for potential issues, and then also spend time testing and refining it. it takes a while to work out all the bugs, and even then you might not be able to detect all the issues
for spells that are easy to test, you can get a solid bug-free design eventually, but for some types of spells it’s very tricky to prevent bugs from seeping in

mind-affecting spells in particular are difficult, because the mind is complex and it’s hard to detect issues
nonetheless, some wizards work on these spells anyways, because it would be really useful to think faster or have better memory or directly exchange thoughts with others
some people really take their time, spending decades to refine their design and check for errors and research the underlying math so ideally they can *prove* it works as intended before they actually test it
but others are more willing to take risks, and test once they have a design they’re pretty sure will work

sometimes they just fail, sometimes the spell drives them crazy, and sometimes it works

and sometimes it looks like it works but subtly alters their values or sanity
and if you can cast a spell that makes you smarter, you can design spells faster

so there could be a sort of molochian race to the bottom to be more careless with your mind-improvement research so you don’t get completely left behind
so it seems likely that the way this scenario ends is with a bunch of wizards (maybe only one if they get sufficient advantage) improving their minds as rapidly as they can, throwing sanity to the wind, and probably the world is dominated by a bunch of insane superintelligences

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with acid shill

acid shill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @acidshill

12 Oct
gov: hmm we’re getting concerned about people abusing drugs
me: well really isn’t that their prob—
gov: it’s the state’s problem, and we’re going to solve it by making it illegal to use dangerous drugs without a medical professional to supervise and make sure you’re safe
me: well, okay, i guess i can see that preventing some drug abuse, but it kinda sucks for all the people who need those drugs and are using them responsibly, so you’ll make sure to inconvenience them as little as possible, right?

right?
gov: yea you’re gonna go to jail if you use drugs without special prescription from a member of a certain class of medical experts with onerous training and credentialing requirements that severely restrict the supply of such experts and make them ridiculously expensive
Read 8 tweets
12 Oct
courts (most relevantly the supreme court and circuit courts) are constrained by popular opinion; if they make a decision 80% of the population disagrees with, they loose legitimacy. so when they do shake things up they limit themselves to issues where there is a controversy
i suspect something similar is going on in many parts of academia (economics comes to mind)

you don’t want to just come out and say ‘yea we all think that everyone is wrong about this’
gotta pretend that the world is a sensible place with sensible people

this is how we get the heuristic ‘if it sounds crazy [i.e. disagrees with common sense] it is crazy’
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
i believe that most people are operating below the ceiling of their agency

which begs the question, how the hell did this happen?

and i think partially there’s a sort of conspiracy (or distributed psyop) to keep people low-agency
there are a lot of people who have an interest in keeping you low-agency, placid, predictable

and not many who have an interest in you reaching the limits of your capability
i don’t feel like doing an in-depth analysis of this, but uh, consider the modern world

how much of it serves to help you grow and increase your power level? how much of it serves to nudge (heh) you into predictable, ordinary tracks?
Read 9 tweets
1 Oct
some people really think individualism and community are mutually exclusive smh
i am in favor of strong, agentic individuals AND strong, deliberate communities which support and empower those individuals
individualism as taking personal responsibility, recognizing, developing, and thoughtfully exercising your power

that’s actually how you get good communities, not by everyone waiting for someone else to take charge
Read 5 tweets
1 Oct
progress on making humans more virtuous has been really lacking for the last several thousand years
you’d think we’d have figured out some more reliable techniques by now
then again there also isn’t a serious tradition of training rationality, which seems like another no-brained
Read 4 tweets
1 Oct
i like this thread and agree with most of its points

one thing i’d add: ‘social skills’ is a pretty vague term, and encompasses a lot of different skills, only some of which have to do with communicating to other people or presenting yourself
now, i’m something of an autist myself, and i feel pretty satisfied with my output-related social skills. i.e. i’m good at presenting myself the way i want to present myself

if i wanted to manipulate people more or control my presentation more, i wouldn’t be good at that
but i definitely have shortcomings wrt actually figuring out what’s going on inside other people’s heads (input)

idk how good the median neurotypical is at this, but i suspect people on the spectrum tend to have a harder time
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(