let’s postulate a universe in which magic exists, and has few limitations other than that if you want to do something, you have to know how to do it. so it’s not too hard to cast spells that already exist, but if you want to do something new, you have to design a spell for it
designing spells is tricky, because the universe is complicated and magic doesn’t allow you to just say ‘i want this result’ without filling in the details
if you design a spell quickly and cast your first draft, it might not work at all, or it might not do what you want, or it might have unforeseen side effects
designing spells, in addition to requiring a certain amount of creativity and technical knowledge, is time-consuming
wizards have to carefully check their design for potential issues, and then also spend time testing and refining it. it takes a while to work out all the bugs, and even then you might not be able to detect all the issues
for spells that are easy to test, you can get a solid bug-free design eventually, but for some types of spells it’s very tricky to prevent bugs from seeping in
mind-affecting spells in particular are difficult, because the mind is complex and it’s hard to detect issues
nonetheless, some wizards work on these spells anyways, because it would be really useful to think faster or have better memory or directly exchange thoughts with others
some people really take their time, spending decades to refine their design and check for errors and research the underlying math so ideally they can *prove* it works as intended before they actually test it
but others are more willing to take risks, and test once they have a design they’re pretty sure will work
sometimes they just fail, sometimes the spell drives them crazy, and sometimes it works
and sometimes it looks like it works but subtly alters their values or sanity
and if you can cast a spell that makes you smarter, you can design spells faster
so there could be a sort of molochian race to the bottom to be more careless with your mind-improvement research so you don’t get completely left behind
so it seems likely that the way this scenario ends is with a bunch of wizards (maybe only one if they get sufficient advantage) improving their minds as rapidly as they can, throwing sanity to the wind, and probably the world is dominated by a bunch of insane superintelligences
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
gov: hmm we’re getting concerned about people abusing drugs
me: well really isn’t that their prob—
gov: it’s the state’s problem, and we’re going to solve it by making it illegal to use dangerous drugs without a medical professional to supervise and make sure you’re safe
me: well, okay, i guess i can see that preventing some drug abuse, but it kinda sucks for all the people who need those drugs and are using them responsibly, so you’ll make sure to inconvenience them as little as possible, right?
right?
gov: yea you’re gonna go to jail if you use drugs without special prescription from a member of a certain class of medical experts with onerous training and credentialing requirements that severely restrict the supply of such experts and make them ridiculously expensive
courts (most relevantly the supreme court and circuit courts) are constrained by popular opinion; if they make a decision 80% of the population disagrees with, they loose legitimacy. so when they do shake things up they limit themselves to issues where there is a controversy
i suspect something similar is going on in many parts of academia (economics comes to mind)
you don’t want to just come out and say ‘yea we all think that everyone is wrong about this’
gotta pretend that the world is a sensible place with sensible people
this is how we get the heuristic ‘if it sounds crazy [i.e. disagrees with common sense] it is crazy’
i like this thread and agree with most of its points
one thing i’d add: ‘social skills’ is a pretty vague term, and encompasses a lot of different skills, only some of which have to do with communicating to other people or presenting yourself
now, i’m something of an autist myself, and i feel pretty satisfied with my output-related social skills. i.e. i’m good at presenting myself the way i want to present myself
if i wanted to manipulate people more or control my presentation more, i wouldn’t be good at that
but i definitely have shortcomings wrt actually figuring out what’s going on inside other people’s heads (input)
idk how good the median neurotypical is at this, but i suspect people on the spectrum tend to have a harder time