Today 10 October is anniversary of the famous battle of Tours in year 732. Under the leadership of Charles Martel, the Franks defeated the invading army of the Umayyad Caliphate. Their disciplined infantry and experience from previous wars played a crucial part in their victory!
This battle is very known and probably doesn't need a long introduction. The mighty Umayyad Caliphate met its match when it encountered the skilled Frankish warriors who stopped the spread of Islam. Tours was just one of many of their encounters, but it is the most known one.
While this battle is notorious for its role in the context in the struggle of Christendom against Islam, but the tactics that Christians used in this battle were much different than what they used later in crusades. At Tours, it was the infantry that played the crucial role!
While the Normans and crusader knights who fought against Saracens were famed for their lethal cavalry charges, at Tours, it was the Umayyads who had the superior cavalry! They used stirrups which were yet unknown to Franks and their elite cavalry had better weapons.
We don't really know the exact numbers, but almost all accounts estimate that at Tours the Umayyad numbers were higher, sometimes significantly higher. The Franks were probably slightly outnumbered at the very least, and were up against a powerful and determined force.
The Frankish leader Charles Martel did manage to bring together a very large army for Europe at the time, calling to arms Catholic tribes over his realms. Burgundians, Alemanni, Bavarians, Thuringians, Aquitanians and Lombards all took arms. Their numbers estimated up to 20000!
The most important attribute the Frankish army had at Tours was definitely military experience. Charles Martel himself had fought in many battles against his rivals and neighboring tribes such as Saxons and Neustrians, waging wars as far away as Frisia and Bavaria.
Because of this reason, the Frankish infantry was a much more formidable and disciplined force than one would expect from infantry at the time. From the accounts it seems that the Umayyad invaders underestimated this aspect.
The Umayyads had already lost to Christian forces in the region in the past, as they lost the battle of Toulouse in 721 against Odo of Aquitaine who was now serving Charles Martel at Tours, but they lost that battle by a surprise cavalry attack while they besieged Toulouse.
Despite this setback, the Umayyads had all the reasons to be confident. They were the empire on the rise, conquering vast lands with a skilled and experienced army united and motivated by religious fervor. They had already conquered Spain and wanted to progress further.
Charles Martel knew what he was up against as well as he faced the "mighty race of Ishmael, who are now
known by the outlandish name of Saracens" as the Chronicle of Fredegar puts it. He decided to take a very defensive and cautious approach.
Charles Martel positioned his army well on the higher ground, with infantry in front and cavalry behind to protect them from being flanked. The trees distorted their real numbers which was deliberate as they were trying to bait the overconfident Umayyads.
His plan worked as the Umayyads charged with their cavalry before making enough scouting beforehand. They did not expect the infantry to hold the cavalry charge but it did! The Frankish infantry held their ground in tight and disciplined formation.
"The men of the north stood as motionless as a wall. They were like a belt of ice frozen together," wrote the Mozarabic chronicle in 754 about how well Frankish infantry performed in this battle as the Moorish horsemen attacked them wave after wave without any success.
This shocked the Moors who did not expect infantry to resist the cavalry charge. Their favorite tactic of pushing strong in the center while flanking the opponents was also neutralized by well chosen position of Frankish troops. They were dragged into a long vicious melee.
The Franks managed to overwhelm their enemy, but it was also at high cost after vicious fighting. The tactical mastery and prudence of Charles Martel won them the battle, and led them to crucial victory which asserted the power of the Franks in the region.
The disciplined Franks did not loot the enemy camp immediately after Moors fled, but patiently stayed in their positions over entire night out of caution. Many battles in history were lost due to soldiers looting too early, and Franks did not make this mistake!
At Tours, patient defensive infantry tactics won the battle for Christendom. Soon after this battle, however, the Europeans would start focusing on developing lethal heavy cavalry charges. The Franks and their descendants would become a powerful force that changed history.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The early modern era saw the production of massive plan reliefs - scale models of cities, fortifications and surrounding landscape for military usage.
Venetians were the early pioneers of this in 16th century. But the French under Louis XIV took this on another level in 17th century, ordering a production of 140 1:600 scale models in 1688, in an aim to catalogue all the important military fortifications and border fortress-cities in France.
The finest military engineers of the realm such as Vauban took part in this project!
Close attention was paid to all the details.
In 1700, Louis XIV installed the huge collection of plan reliefs in the Louvre. These models could initially only be viewed by elite and were a sort of state secret, as they would provide important knowledge in an event of war.
A large number of such models was built during and after wars, to include newly captured cities and fortresses. Many new plan reliefs were made during the rule of Louis XV in 18th century, some of them to replace the old damage ones.
The construction of plan reliefs shows a new development in European military history. With the advent of siege artillery and bastion fort fortifications, it became hugely important for European states to upgrade their key fortresses and ensure that their strategic cities and towns were fortified enough to endure an enemy assault. Topographic features were studied and sieges were meticulously planned!
It also shows the centralization of European states, which felt the need to have their military capabilities carefully catalogued, helping them to better devise a grand strategy to protect their borders against all threats, studying the possible weak points.
After the fall of Ancien Regime, the production of plan reliefs was revived by Napoleon who ordered the construction of many new ones.
These plan reliefs could also end up in enemy hands, captured as spoils of war. This happened in 1814 when Prussians took 17 models with them to Berlin.
The production of plan reliefs continued into 19th century, but they would eventually be rendered obsolete by 1870 as military technology developed further and artillery became even more powerful, too powerful for the old bastion fort fortifications.
Fortunately, many of the old plan reliefs survived to this day and are stored in the Musée des Plans-Reliefs where they could be observed by curious visitors.
An example of a plan relief kept in Musée des Plans-Reliefs in Paris.
Besançon and surrounding fortifications, made in 1722.
The level of detail is astonishing!
The scale model of Antibes and coast fortifications is quite epic!
Vauban helped to fortify this strategically important port in the French Riviera.
During 16th century sieges, mines and counter-mines were dug.
It was not uncommon that brutal subterranean fighting would take place in the mines!
It's incredible that such mines are still preserved today at St Andrews Castle in Scotland where a siege took place in 1546. 🧵
The well-preserved 16th century siege mines at St Andrews Castle reveal the hard work that was done by both the besiegers and the defenders to dig these tunnels.
During sieges, a lot depended on such subterranean battles.
Such tactics had already been in place for a long time in various medieval and early modern sieges all over Europe.
The besiegers dug tunnels trying to undermine enemy towers or sections of the wall, paving the way for the infantry to storm the city or fortification.
It's wild how Denmark had colonies in India for more than 200 years from 1620 to 1869.
Fort Dansborg, built in 1620, still stands today in the Bay of Bengal.
They had forts, factories, trading posts. But they eventually sold their possessions to British Empire.
The Danish presence in India was of little significance to the major European powers as they presented neither a military nor a mercantile threat so they let them carve out their own niche.
A map of Danish trade routes in the region.
The operation was initially conducted by Danish East India Company.
But the early years of the Danish adventure in India in 1620s were horrible. Almost two-thirds of all the trading vessels dispatched from Denmark were lost.
English explorer John Smith, famous for his involvement in establishing the Jamestown colony in America in 1607.
His coat of arms featured the heads of three Ottoman soldiers whom he beheaded in duels while serving as a mercenary in Transylvania during the Long Turkish War.
John Smith is known today for his role in managing the colony of Jamestown in Virginia, the first permanent English settlement in North America, and his connection with a Powhatan woman called Pocahontas.
But John Smith was also a powerful warrior and mercenary prior to that.
Born in England, he set off to sea in 1596 at age 16 after his father died to become a mercenary, fighting for the French against the Spanish.
He was looking for what he called "brave adventures".
After a truce was made in 1598, he joined a French pirate crew in Mediterranean.
Many Irishmen served the Habsburgs over centuries and distinguished themselves.
Over 100 Irishmen were field marshals, generals, or admirals in the Austrian Army!
Some of the illustrious Irish warriors serving the Habsburg emperors. 🧵
In 1853 there was an assassination attempt on emperor Franz Joseph in Vienna by a Hungarian nationalist.
But the emperor's life was saved by Count Maximilian Karl Lamoral O'Donnell who cut the assassin down with a sabre.
O'Donnell was a descendant of Irish nobility!
Maximilian ancestors -the powerful O'Donnell clan- left Ireland during the Flight of the Earls in 1607, when Irish earls and their followers left Ireland in the aftermath of their defeat against the English Crown in the Nine Years' War in 1603.
Many inns appeared in medieval Europe, offering foods, drinks and a place to socialize, as well as lodging for travelers, helping transportation logistics.
In this thread I will present some of the old medieval inns that survived to this day, from various European countries!🧵
The George Inn. Norton St Philip in Somerset, England 🏴.
Built in 14th century and completed in 15th century, this is a proper medieval inn.
Being an innkeeper was a respected social position. In medieval England, innkeepers were generally wealthy and held influence in towns!
Stiftskeller St. Peter. St Peter's Abbey in Salzburg, Austria 🇦🇹.
Often mentioned as the oldest inn in Central Europe, for it was first mentioned in 803 in a letter to Charlemagne.
It operated as part of the monastery to give food to pilgrims. Now a prestigious restaurant.