If you wear glasses – prescription, shades, even Facebook smart glasses – you’ve likely dealt with EssilorLuxottica.
The conglomerate was built by Leonardo Del Vecchio who rose from penniless to being the 2nd richest Italian.
His story is master class in business strategy.
After the 2018 merger of Del Vecchio’s Luxottica with the French Essilor, the company dominates global eyewear with
-140,000 employees
-€14.4bn in 2020 revenue
-11,000 stores
Brands including Ray Ban, Oakley, Oliver Peoples, and partnerships from Armani to Prada.
Del Vecchio was born in Milan in 1935. His father died when he was only five months old and his mother was forced to send him to a local orphanage at age 7.
The boy became an apprentice at a tool factory and graduated in 1958 with a degree in metal engraving.
He set up his own workshop in Milan before moving to Agordo in 1961. The mountain town struggled and Vecchio was given space to build a factory. Two customers helped finance the launch of Luxottica as a contract manufacturer making parts and frames for others.
Del Vecchio was obsessed with improving and took courses in machine design to make his own equipment.
He lowered the cost of adapting to changes in fashion: "by mastering all the technologies, we [became] very competitive on price, without having to compromise our quality."
The company nearly failed in 1971, when his investors called in their loans. But he found capital from a distributor.
He also launched his own brand: “For ten years I sold parts. One day I say, 'I'm stupid. I'm sending parts to manufacturers. Why don't I industrialize this?”
As he lowered costs, he saw the margins of his distributors increase. “My heart was crying, to see that.”
This led to his first major strategic insight: he needed to cut out the middlemen. All of them. He started by buying out most of his distributors or taking stakes in them.
His second innovation was to combine his business with the fashion industry. In 1988, he signed his first licensing deal with Giorgio Armani. Thanks to the power of fashion brands, his glasses would become more desirable - and more expensive.
In 1990, he pulled off an IPO in New York. This gave him capital for a major deal. In 1995, he acquired United States Shoe. Wait, what? He expanded into shoes? Not quite.
The company owned the LensCrafters chain.
Luxottica’s midrange was being squeezed by growing retail chains, lower healthcare reimbursements, and discount frames. After selling all other business units, he was left with LensCrafters at 1x revenue and 9x operating income. “The trick was keeping margins in-house”
Next came the $640mm purchase of Ray Ban from Bausch & Lomb in 1999. The brand was tired, “they were selling Wayfarers at Walmart.”
He upgraded quality, shifted production to Luxottica plants, and cut distribution channels. Today, Ray Ban is the company’s most valuable brand.
He bought Sunglass Hut in 2001. With growing scale, he could squeeze competitors.
“When they buy a company, they spend a little time figuring it out and kick out all the other suppliers.”
He asked for price cuts from all of Sunglass Hut’s suppliers. Only one refused: Oakley.
Oakley’s founder Jim Jannard traveled to Italy to negotiate. When he left, Del Vecchio reportedly told him "we will never be friends."
Oakly supplied 25% of Sunglass Hut’s products and Del Vecchio started removing them from the shelves. Oakley’s stock dropped 37%.
“There was a kind of war going on.” Oakley sued and the case was settled.
In 2007, Luxottica bought Oakley for $2bn
Del Vecchio had retired in 2004 but returned in 2014 at age 79. He orchestrated the €48bn merger with the French leader in lenses: Essilor.
Essilor’s history dates back to 1849 as a worker’s cooperative. In 1959 it introduced Varilux, the first progressive lenses.
This deal was the final piece of vertical integration: one global company supplying frames and lenses, present at every step of the value chain.
Today, Del Vecchio remains chairman. He and his family are worth an estimated $26 billion.
In addition, more than 60,000 employees are shareholders.
Wild stat from the company: 60% of all people require vision correction
There is of course controversy around the company’s power and opaque pricing of prescription eyewear:
“There is no competition in the industry. Luxottica bought everyone. They set whatever prices they please.”
"He won easily and told us why: 'When you've got land, you shouldn't build little houses on it right away. First you have to keep a close eye on your capital and not spread it around wildly."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"It's like you have a cell phone and then somebody gives you the charger. Oh, I can get this thing up to a hundred anytime I want?!
"It doesn't feel like anything. Doesn't do anything. I don't get it. I don't understand it. But here's the difference: at 1pm that day, my head does not hit the desk like it used to. ... I sail through the day."
"The way I look at life, basically is it's exhausting. Being busy is exhausting. Doing nothing is exhausting. No matter what you do, it's exhausting.
Sleep is hit and miss, [transcendental meditation] is not. It's this thing that augments your need for rest.
"I would always say to the people that don't do it, I can't believe you stay up all day."
"A lot of stand up is analogies.
The phone charger is pretty tough to beat as an analogy because your phone charger never doesn't work.
And that's the great thing about TM. You never have to wonder. That's the big difference between sleep and TM. TM never doesn't work perfect."
"Trait #1 is the ability to buy stocks while others are panicking and sell stocks while others are euphoric.
When 1999 comes around and the market is going up almost every day, you can't bring yourself to sell because if you do, you may fall behind your peers."
Roughly: Investing -> returning capital -> liquidating assets.
Unexpected:
"We expected low or negative spreads between ROIC and WACC for companies newly listed, rising spreads as they mature, a decline in senescence.
What we found was nearly the opposite. The spread at the date of the IPO was high and narrowed before stabilizing."
Companies going public (selling equity to new investors) when return on capital looks most attractive (and is about to decline)?
Returns to shareholders on the other hand were most attractive for more mature companies.
Druckenmiller: "I am so tired of being a bear, and being labeled a bear."
But: Liquidity ⬇️
"Since it's taken so long, the Fed has ended up with a higher terminal rate. Inflation gets stickier the longer its in the system. That increases the probability of a hard landing."
"We always short the same way. ... I try and think of a situation 12 to 18 months from now and if I think the security prices are going to be less, I short.
Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever made money in shorts. I like it. It's fun, but you can get your head handed to you."
"When I was at Soros, I shorted $200 million worth of Internet stocks in March of 99. And in three weeks covered them at a $600 million loss. I lost $600 million on a $200 million investment in three weeks.
I was short 12 stocks. They all went bankrupt Every one of them."
ROIC and margins for companies with different moats by @mjmauboussin
"A company creates value when its ROIC is in excess of cost of capital. Stated differently, it makes a dollar worth of investment worth more than a dollar in market value.
The market broadly appreciates this, especially when growth is considered as an additional variable."
"Markets are akin to an ecosystem where investors fill various niches. Investors with a short-term horizon tend to focus on near-term metrics such as sales and earnings.
Investors with a long-term horizon focus on competitive advantage and the size of the market opportunity."
Like other great investors, Sam Zell used content as a form of leverage. His "guide to the risky art of resurrecting dead properties" earned him his nickname, the Grave Dancer.
"Some might see buying and creating value from others’ mistakes as a form of exploitation, but I see it as giving neglected or devalued assets new life.
Often in my career I’ve been the only bidder for them—the last chance for a resurrection."
"I’m not claiming to be altruistic— just optimistic, and confident that I can turn those assets around.
That, in my definition, is an entrepreneur. Someone who doesn’t just see the problems but also sees the solutions—the opportunities."