1/ Here’s a thread linking tweets and articles with some useful info related to the referendum question about equalization, on the ballot for Alberta’s municipal elections October 18, 2021.
Tweet 2/ of this thread, is the text of the question
2/ Should section 36(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982, Parliament and the government of Canada’s commitment to the principle of making equalization payments, be removed from the Constitution?
Your answer choices: yes or no calgary.ca/election/infor…
3/ Adding this relevant & informative thread by U of Alberta political scientist @DrJaredWesley, is quote-tweeted by @trevortombe, including his (U of C Prof Tombe’s) added commentary
5/ “Equalization is a symbol of what it means to be Canadian and a pillar of our social and economic bargain that allows Alberta to run more of its own affairs.
6/ (quote from 5/ cont’d) “Threatening to remove it from the constitution will not only undermine this bargain. It will also bolster the cause of separatists here at home.”
7/ (abbrev) “[W]ould require Ottawa and all provinces to sit down and negotiate to amend the constitution, something that just isn’t going to happen no matter how strong the referendum result turns out to be.”
17/ adding this relevant observation by @paulisci, to my collection of tweets/threads about the equalization question that will be on the ballot in Alberta's general election Oct. 18
21/ "In defence of equalization
Stephen Maher: It is a dangerous mistake to view Canada as a piggybank into which some provinces make payments and others withdrawals"
from the #AtIssue clip ref'd in tweet 23/:
Andrew Coyne: "Mostly a stunt […] If there’s anything that Albertans dislike more than equalization it's Jason Kenney" (Mr. Coyne notes this as a reasons some might vote no for equalization = to show displeasure with the premier)
...
also from the #AtIssue clip ref'd in tweet 23/:
Chantal Hébert: "Conceived at a time when Kenney was influential [no longer the case] […] The question is [asking Albertans if they want to] walk away from equalization."
...
another quote from the #AtIssue clip referenced in tweet 23/:
Althia Raj: "Kenney has been campaigning against Trudeau for the past decade." (this was in response to whether Kenney would drop complaining about equalization if majority of Albertans voted no)
26/ I'm going to unroll this (hopefully will work), so that there's a pdf online you can share with other Albertans you know, who don't use Twitter: @threadreaderapp please unroll - thanks
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The member for Sarnia-Lambton, ON - Marilyn Gladu, a CPC MP, just admitted to why they're really filibustering parliament - the Cdn federal Conservatives are taking a page out of the US' GOP playbook and obstructing govt legislation.
2/ The claim that docs haven't been provided to the RCMP by the Liberals, is not true. The RCMP have said they already have what they need for their investigation. Not only that, but it would be inappropriate for parliamentarians to direct the work of the independent RCMP.
*To clarify, it is a false claim being made by the CPC MP when she says that the Liberals didn't provide docs to the RCMP
Canadian voters, please think hard before you support the CPC. Take note that they think using M*usk's Starlink is the way to go. M*sk denied the use of Starlink by Ukraine, to help the Kremlin. Think about what decisions they'd make as cabinet ministers if CPC formed govt.
2/ Regarding what the Canadian govt is planning to use:
It's not normal to accuse govt of starting wildfires; wish to fire BofC's gov; push Bitcoin; be anti-expert; be anti-WEF; let Leslyn Lewis stay in front bench despite assoc w/AfD, etc.; march w/James Topp; back anti-vax mandate bill; call PET & PMJT Marxists; use MGTOW tag, etc.
3/ (My linked thread in 2/ doesn't include ref to Poilievre's anti-WEF stance, here's a ref)
"In speeches to Conservative supporters across Canada, Poilievre has promised that none of his ministers will attend the international organization's conferences" ctvnews.ca/politics/poili…
Kristin, you're being shown a clip out of context. If you'd watched QP today, you'd know that he was responding to CPC member's claims that Cdns would save $500 to $800 if the carbon tax was removed. To save that you'd need to drive 37,000 klms. You'd need to drive non-stop 24-7.
@TheJasonPugh 3/
I really think people like Kirstin mean well and I blame those who are lying to her or manipulating her with clips shared out of context.
Rage-farming with disinformation and use of hyperbolic rhetoric and tug-at-your-heartstrings anecdotes. I'm waiting for Poilievre to accuse the (fed Liberal) govt of k*lling puppies next (has come close to doing that today in #QP).