People crossing the Channel by boat to seek asylum are visible in a way that people making different journeys to UK to do so are not. Ministers & others have exploited this visibility to excite some sense of national emergency. But what is the reality… 1/11
Firstly, there were more asylum claims made in UK in 2019 than 2020. In first half of 2021, there were more claims than in first half of 2020 but still fewer than same period in 2019. So, over period of heightened attention to boat crossings, asylum claims haven’t gone up. 2/11
Secondly, backlogs & delays in asylum system have significantly increased over this period. Pandemic certainly had an impact as did @ukhomeoffice response to it. And Ministers have added to this by delaying consideration of many claims. 3/11
Those delays caused by Ministers include introducing rules at end 2020 to put new claims on hold (by refusing to admit people to UK asylum process) on basis @ukhomeoffice will somehow persuade other countries to receive people from UK into their asylum systems. 4/11
Thirdly, UK remains a very modest recipient of people seeking asylum. Its nearest & most comparable European neighbours receive many more people into their systems. 5/11
Ministers often highlight resettlement schemes that have operated (particularly for Syrians) or are to operate (particularly for Afghans) as suggesting UK is already a leader in providing asylum. But even UK’s asylum system provides for far more refugees than these schemes. 6/11
So, to recap, few people come to UK to seek or receive asylum. Number of people doing so hasn’t increased while boat crossings have increased. Number of people seeking asylum by other routes has, therefore, gone down, which strongly indicates no more than a change in route. 7/11
The ‘emergency’ emphasised by Ministers & others is clearly a fabrication. Ironically, people seeking asylum more visibly is being used to excite fear & hostility. If people had continued on routes that were less visible, this fabrication wouldn’t have been possible. 8/11
One especially ironic aspect of this dismal irony was creation of a Clandestine Channel Threat Commander in response to something that’s hardly clandestine, constitutes no threat & over which he has no command. But title does sound impressive - which is of course the point. 9/11
Ministers make such noise about boat crossings that it’s difficult to maintain grip on reality - which in terms of impact on UK’s asylum system is that nothing much at all has changed save for Ministers making system ever more costly, harmful & inept. #BreakingNotFixing 10/11
Of course, Ministers dare not admit to that. So on they go, perpetuating nonsense that asylum system is breaking under emergency pressure when truth is they are breaking that system by their responses to a situation that hasn’t fundamentally changed at all. 11/11

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Valdez-Symonds

Steve Valdez-Symonds Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevesymondsAI

18 Feb
One striking aspect drawn out in today’s children’s citizenship fee judgment is that the Home Secretary effectively abandoned her own evidence submitted to the High Court & sought to rely on parliamentary debates to show she had done something her own evidence could not show. 1/7
Her own evidence showed she hadn’t considered children’s best interests in setting a fee that deprived many children of citizenship rights, not least because it showed a failure or refusal to understand that citizenship rights were highly important & belonged to the children. 2/7
So, she tried to rely on debates in Parliament led by peers & MPs, with support from @PRCBC1 & @AmnestyUK, many of whom aghast at the fee, to say that because others had complained at her fee’s injustice & impact this was enough for her to have considered this. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
12 Jan 18
Her daughter was banned from Home Office building because officials refused to tolerate being told they were wrong. Let’s think on that. 1/5
Over several years, Ministers & Parliament have cut & removed rights of appeal because they refuse to tolerate people insisting officials are wrong & trying to correct that. 2/5
Ministers & Parliament have cut & removed #legalaid & constrained access to judicial review because they refuse to tolerate people insisting officials are wrong & trying to correct that. 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(