Prosecutor: "What was most unbelievable is the defendant's claim she would not have gone into the Capitol if she knew she were not allowed"
Prosecutor cites all of the chaos and mayhem that was self-evident to those in the mob
Prosecutor just said the feds offered probation when they first made the plea deal with Bissey.. and they're going to stick with their offer.
That's possibly a nod to the growing criticism of the "probation" deals being cut in Jan 6 cases
Feds say "it's important" Bissey not fall for another "conspiracy"..... including that COVID is a "hoax pandemic"
"It's one thing to believe in conspiracy theories in your basement, it's another thing to act on it"
Feds are seeking drug testing for Bissey.... community service, ban on firearms possession....
And they credit her for "two days" she served in jail after arrest
Prosecutor: "When the defendant visited the Capitol that day she was not a tourist... "
In one case after another, feds or judges keep slamming the "tourist" argument from Rep Andrew Clyde (R-GA)
Defense: "This cannot be about Ms Bissey's beliefs .. as strange and weird as they are"
Defense: "She's gregarious, she's warm.. I can promise you she's not a monster. She;'s a woman who made a mistake"
Defense: "She did not come to (DC) with any intention, other than supporting her President."
Defense: "She is sorry. She is ashamed of her actions on January 6"
Defense says Bissey's husband went to emergency room today... and that Bissey showed "integrity" by proceeding with sentencing
Bissey is given opportunity to address court, but declines
Judge will now issue sentence and remarks
Judge Tanya Chutkan: "Ms Bissey was no inadvertent participant"
Judge: "This case is not about Ms Bissey's political beliefs.. it's about her actions"
Judge: "When Ms Bissey got home she was not (struck) with remorse or regret"
Judge: "Had there been no public outcry, she'd still be proud of her participation...."
Judge it factors in Bissey's favor that she didn't assault anyone or do damage.... then adds "people are complicated"
Judge references prosecutor argument that Bissey is particularly susceptible to conspiracy theories... then adds "that is her right"
Judge keeps saying this case is not about her belief
And.. there it is: Judge says it's ironic that Bissey is arguing that she shouldn't be jailed due to COVID risk...... considering Bissey hasn't been vaccinated and has talked about COVID conspiracy theories
Defense acknowledges Bissey has NOT been vaccinated.. saying her doctor has "not told her" to get the vaccine
Defense appears blaming the doctor. Judge interjects saying no evidence has been entered on this matter.. including any indication her doctor has advised AGAINST vax
And... now we're transitioning to a vaccine debate
Defense says vaccine wouldn't protect Bissey from "breakthrough case"
Judge: "You're setting up a straw man" argument
There are so many intersections between anti-vaxxing and Jan 6 defendants
So, so many
Judge: Vaccines "can't be a reason I give her a lighter sentence"
Judge: "The court concludes this is not an appropriate case for a probation argument"
"There must be consequences...."
Judge: "She was fully aware of the chaos and destruction around her"... then says Bissey later bragged of participation
"....People inside the Capitol were suffering that day.. just for doing their jobs"
**** Judge: "The people inside that Capitol... they were patriots also" ****
Hammering down the arguments from Jan 6 defendants that they're "patriots"
ALERT - Judge sentences Dona Bissey to 14 days in jail
This joins a recent series of cases, in which judges are taking a harder line in misdemeanor Jan 6 case sentencings
Increasingly... it's a harder line
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At 930am, arguments begin here at DC federal court in the civil lawsuit brought by some U.S. House members against Trump, alleging he violated federal law by galvanizing the Jan 6 rioters and attack
Judge hears arguments on whether case should proceed
Arguments are underway here in DC federal court in civil lawsuit by Members of Congress seeking damages from Trump for Jan 6
Question today: Will case be allowed to proceed?
Former Rep Barbara Lee (D-CA) is lead plaintiff. She’s here in the (very) crowded courtroom on 4th floor
Eight defense lawyers are at the table representing Trump… who is not here
NEW: Justice Dept files motion in court seeking to dismiss civil lawsuit filed by injured police officers who responded on Jan 6
Officers' suit sought court order to hang the legally-required Jan 6 honorary plaque for police
Justice Dept argues the plaque is faulty!
(MORE)
The Justice Department argues that the plaque that's been shown on Capitol Hill "lists the names of approximately twenty-one law enforcement entities not the approximately 3,648 individual names of law enforcement personnel provided to the Architect"
Justice Dept motion (more): "Thus, the plaque referenced in that testimony is not the plaque directed by the statute, which calls for the creation of a plaque
'listing the names of all of the officers"
ALERT: Former FBI agents file suit alleging "unlawful retaliation" against Kash Patel & FBI.. for firings over their kneeling response during DC unrest after George Floyd murder
Suit: "As a result of their tactical decision to kneel, the mass of people moved on without escalating to violence"
The dozen fired FBI agents are seeking a court order to restore their jobs and provide backpay
Suit: "Plaintiffs were among the FBI personnel deployed during this period and saw the potential for violence first-hand" .. they say the kneeling was a de-escalation tool
FBI agents lawsuit (MORE): "Plaintiffs had been informed that the purpose of the deployment was to show a visible law enforcement presence, and they wore vests marked 'FBI' and carried their firearms. But they were not properly prepared or instructed to conduct crowd control operations"
FLASH: Judge rules James Comey criminal case is dismissed without prejudice. Judge determined the US Attorney Lindsey Halligan was not lawfully appointed
"All actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s defective appointment, including securing and signing Mr. Comey’s indictment, were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside."
From the judge: "The Attorney General’s authority to appoint an interim U.S. Attorney lasts for a total of 120 days from the date she first invokes section 546 after the departure of a Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney. If the position remains vacant at the end of the 120-day period, the exclusive authority to make further interim appointments under the statute shifts to the district court"
ALERT: James Comey files another motion to dismiss criminal case, citing issues with grand jury presentation by US Atty Lindsey Halligan
"The government has thus committed a series of flagrant legal violations. And the government’s misconduct has threatened Mr. Comey’s liberty—even though Mr. Comey should be experiencing the peace of an expired statute of limitations"
The new 29-page motion by James Comey to dismiss his criminal case includes this header:
"THE INDICTMENT SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE BASED ON MISCONDUCT BEFORE THE GRAND JURY"
James Comey's new motion to dismiss (MORE): "A grand jury may indict only if at least 12 jurors concur.' But here, at least 12 jurors did not concur in the only indictment presented to the grand jury."
Three sources familiar with the matter tell CBS News federal investigators are questioning the handling of the investigation into California Senator Adam Schiff
(MORE)
Christine Bish, a California Republican who filed an initial tip w/ the feds about Schiff’s mortgage documentation, told CBS News she was questioned by federal agents today and was asked about Bill Pulte, the Trump-appointed head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency
(MORE)
Christine Bish characterized the interview to CBS News. She said, “They weren't asking me about Schiff. They were asking me about other people who were investigating Schiff."