Prosecutor: "What was most unbelievable is the defendant's claim she would not have gone into the Capitol if she knew she were not allowed"
Prosecutor cites all of the chaos and mayhem that was self-evident to those in the mob
Prosecutor just said the feds offered probation when they first made the plea deal with Bissey.. and they're going to stick with their offer.
That's possibly a nod to the growing criticism of the "probation" deals being cut in Jan 6 cases
Feds say "it's important" Bissey not fall for another "conspiracy"..... including that COVID is a "hoax pandemic"
"It's one thing to believe in conspiracy theories in your basement, it's another thing to act on it"
Feds are seeking drug testing for Bissey.... community service, ban on firearms possession....
And they credit her for "two days" she served in jail after arrest
Prosecutor: "When the defendant visited the Capitol that day she was not a tourist... "
In one case after another, feds or judges keep slamming the "tourist" argument from Rep Andrew Clyde (R-GA)
Defense: "This cannot be about Ms Bissey's beliefs .. as strange and weird as they are"
Defense: "She's gregarious, she's warm.. I can promise you she's not a monster. She;'s a woman who made a mistake"
Defense: "She did not come to (DC) with any intention, other than supporting her President."
Defense: "She is sorry. She is ashamed of her actions on January 6"
Defense says Bissey's husband went to emergency room today... and that Bissey showed "integrity" by proceeding with sentencing
Bissey is given opportunity to address court, but declines
Judge will now issue sentence and remarks
Judge Tanya Chutkan: "Ms Bissey was no inadvertent participant"
Judge: "This case is not about Ms Bissey's political beliefs.. it's about her actions"
Judge: "When Ms Bissey got home she was not (struck) with remorse or regret"
Judge: "Had there been no public outcry, she'd still be proud of her participation...."
Judge it factors in Bissey's favor that she didn't assault anyone or do damage.... then adds "people are complicated"
Judge references prosecutor argument that Bissey is particularly susceptible to conspiracy theories... then adds "that is her right"
Judge keeps saying this case is not about her belief
And.. there it is: Judge says it's ironic that Bissey is arguing that she shouldn't be jailed due to COVID risk...... considering Bissey hasn't been vaccinated and has talked about COVID conspiracy theories
Defense acknowledges Bissey has NOT been vaccinated.. saying her doctor has "not told her" to get the vaccine
Defense appears blaming the doctor. Judge interjects saying no evidence has been entered on this matter.. including any indication her doctor has advised AGAINST vax
And... now we're transitioning to a vaccine debate
Defense says vaccine wouldn't protect Bissey from "breakthrough case"
Judge: "You're setting up a straw man" argument
There are so many intersections between anti-vaxxing and Jan 6 defendants
So, so many
Judge: Vaccines "can't be a reason I give her a lighter sentence"
Judge: "The court concludes this is not an appropriate case for a probation argument"
"There must be consequences...."
Judge: "She was fully aware of the chaos and destruction around her"... then says Bissey later bragged of participation
"....People inside the Capitol were suffering that day.. just for doing their jobs"
**** Judge: "The people inside that Capitol... they were patriots also" ****
Hammering down the arguments from Jan 6 defendants that they're "patriots"
ALERT - Judge sentences Dona Bissey to 14 days in jail
This joins a recent series of cases, in which judges are taking a harder line in misdemeanor Jan 6 case sentencings
Increasingly... it's a harder line
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ALERT: A former Coast Guard Lieutenant and sharpshooter, who also served as a FEMA instructor, has been arrested and charged with making threats to kill President Trump. The charging documents in the case include voluminous allegations of social media between 2020 and last week
The social media posts, which span from 2020 to 2025, include on-line statements of using a gun, a knife and poison against Trump, per federal prosecutors
And they include alleged death threats made as recently as last Wednesday on social media
Judge has just ordered Pete Stinson held in jail, pending a hearing WEDNESDAY
Here are some of the alleged threats, per charging documents ===>
In a flurry of legal filings this afternoon, the Washington, D.C.-based Heritage Foundation conservative action group is asking a federal judge for a hearing TODAY or TONIGHT on the matter of the leaked audio of President Biden’s interview by then-Special Counsel Robert Hur
Heritage is asking a DC federal judge "for a temporary restraining order directing defendant to produce all recordings of former President Joseph R. Biden’s Interview with Special Counsel Robert K. Hur.. within 4 hours of this Court’s order"
Heritage and media outlets had filed Freedom of Information Act requests for the audio last year
Heritage argues the release of snippets of the audio by the Axios news service adds urgency to their request
Court filing: "How did a record subject to a claim of Executive Privilege and possibly classified make it into the hands of Axios? Add to that how did that record end up being spliced without notion? The Court must require an immediate answer to that question. This situation is untenable. Full disclosure is necessary now"
In a scathing 4-page court filing overnight, a group of FBI employees who investigated the Jan. 6 attack have asked a judge to order the Justice Department to destroy its controversial list of 5,000+ FBI employees who were part of the US Capitol Insurrection investigation (more)
The filing notes this week’s public statements by Ed Martin, the newly-named member of Justice Dept’s “weaponization” group. The group of FBI workers is worried about the list being publicized or leaked by Justice Dept, subjecting the agents to retaliation & violence (more)
The FBI employees argue that Martin publicly pledged Tuesday to “name and shame” employees inside the department.
Inside federal court in Milwaukee, awaiting 10am arraignment of Judge Hannah Dugan, whose arrest was announced by FBI Director Kash Patel last month. She’s accused of obstruction and re-routing an undocumented immigrant in her court away from agents
Judge Dugan is asking that her case be dismissed. She’s laced her argument with reference to Supreme Court’s 2024 “immunity” ruling which benefited Trump. She’s arguing her actions in her court were “official” acts
Judge Dugan’s defense argued in a filing yesterday:
“The problems with this prosecution are legion, but most immediately, the government cannot prosecute Judge Dugan because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts. Immunity is not a defense to the prosecution to be determined later by a jury or court; it is an absolute bar to the prosecution at the outset”
NEW: In a blistering new order, federal judge Paula Xinis of Maryland says the Trump Administration is making "a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations" in the court case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Judge Paula Xinis also finds the Trump Admin has "sought refuge behind vague and unsubstantiated assertions of privilege, using them as a shield to obstruct discovery and evade compliance with this court's orders" in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case
The judge's order also throws shade on the Trump Admin's claim Abrego Garcia is out of their control ... in Salvadoran custody
Judge: "Indeed, custody can be joint, and custodial status may be controlled by the Defendants acting in concert with El Salvador"