Spent a part of the day at @librarycongress reading letters from the secretary of the DC branch of the NAACP in the 1910s, a graduate of @fisk1866, to various (white) editors/publishers. In dignified, beautiful prose, he explained why certain words were racial slurs— 1/
and why publishers who'd printed books & articles w/those words in them should elevate their minds & their language. He was particularly troubled by the potential effect of using one of those words in a counting rhyme ("Ten Little [Deleted]s") in a children's book would have 2/
on Black children who might be given a copy. He mentioned that it had recently become official policy of the @boyscouts to prohibit boys from using racial slurs to describe African Americans, Jews, Italians, and Poles. 3/
There were responses from several of the editors & publishers. Most said they hadn't "meant any insult" in using them. Some pointed out that African Americans used the *n* word among themselves, & argued that made it okay for white writers to use it. 4/
One, taken to task for depicting the speech of Black southerners in "dialect" & making them sound ignorant, protested that he was just trying for an accurate portrayal that was intended to amuse. Everything about the "good intentions" of the white publishers. 5/
Lots of explanations, no apology for harm done. Except that the publisher of the children's book thanked the secretary for alerting him to the issue, & informed him that they'd changed the offending word in the rhyme (to something likely offensive to a different group). 6/
And it made me think about how many of those same damn arguments, explanations, & rationalizations I see just about every day in some of my social media feeds (veterans' groups), more than a century later. How long Black activists have been patiently trying to educate 7/
some white people on...basic decency & courtesy. Why is that so hard? Why is it still so hard for us to just *listen* and do better? The collection included some files of studio portraits—family, friends. All long dead. I had trouble looking them in the eye nonetheless. 8/
Anyway. That particular collection is a treasure. Those voices, so carefully preserved, are still speaking truth and wisdom that America needs to hear. Grateful to be allowed to read those letters, see those photos. 9/end
(Not end. I fall a little bit in love with many of the people I'm researching. What mattered to them starts to matter to me. When they hurt, I hurt. Reading fiction is known to improve the reader's empathy; I think that reading history must have the same effect.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And let's take a look, @SMH_Historians, at a little example of how this works, right from military history. Yeoman 3rd Class Inez Beatrice McIntosh (Jackson), USNR(F), was one of the 1st 14 Black women to serve officially, & openly as Black women, in the US armed forces. 1/
She was the youngest child of formerly enslaved parents Philip and Bettie Royster McIntosh of Okolona, Mississippi. After her wartime service in Washington, DC, she married her colleague Pocahontas Jackson's younger brother DeForest. DeForest Jackson became a dentist. 2/
Here's Inez, probably in 1918. She was about 24 years old. Isn't she cute? I can't swear that the sailor making sheep's eyes at her is DeForest Jackson, but Inez was from a very nice family & I don't think she'd let just any boy hold her hand & look at her that way. 3/
So many issues w/the way this is presented here. First: Learning difficulties do not equal "low intelligence." One of the smartest officers I served with was functionally illiterate. Couldn't read nursery rhymes. He had a MS in electrical engineering.
Asked how he'd managed it: he could read equations like I read text—better, maybe. He'd developed a photographic memory. He asked classmates who were doing well to tell him what had been in assigned readings in classes that weren't math/physics/engineering.
A lot of the smartest, most capable enlisted people I worked with had some small learning difference that resulted in mediocre high school grades or an inability to sit through lecture classes in college. They enlisted when they fell through the cracks. Still amazing sailors.
Between the SMH letter & this stupid article, I spent entirely too much time today reading about the longing of white men for a time when they didn't have to sit w/the discomfort of acknowledging that some lives & all of history are inherently political. nytimes.com/2021/09/17/boo…
Wanting to "purify" art & history of the political is, in itself, a political stance: one that dismisses, excludes, & belittles the lives, experiences, & histories of women, people of color, the disabled, the LGBTQ community.
It's also an attempt at elitist gatekeeping. I'm so sick of that shit. Taking a political or moral stance does not exclude the possibility of contradiction & ambiguity. Excluding the political limits & circumscribes the possibility for contradiction & ambiguity, in art & history.
Good morning to everyone except Jim Golby. I'd like to say a few things about emotionally abusive relationships this morning. First, emotional abuse is abuse. Full stop. 1/
Emotional abuse happens when a predator manipulates the emotional needs & desires of the victim to compel behavior that, all other things being equal, the victim would not normally choose to engage in. 2/
That’s why consensual sex, as we typically understand it, can be a component of an emotionally abusive relationship. It makes things particularly insidious. 3/
Breaking both my Twitter fast and my silence about Afghanistan briefly this morning, now that we are officially "out" of the wars that have defined our foreign policy for two decades. And now that the 20th anniversary of 9/11 is approaching us. 1/
I had a 20-year career in military intelligence. It grieved me after 9/11 to hear the terrorist attack on the US described as an "intelligence failure," and to hear that same description applied to events at the end of our operations in Afghanistan in recent weeks. 2/
The failures did not begin in the intelligence community. Both 9/11 and the ending of our Afghanistan operations began with a failure of the vision that should guide intelligence operations, & a failure of honesty on the part of senior US government officials. 3/
@AdrianBonenber1 I wouldn't say naïve, exactly, but the piece I think you're missing is how the sausage gets made for a visit from a congressional delegation & why. Speaking here from 3 years' experience in the US Defense Attaché Office in Moscow, Russia. 1/
@AdrianBonenber1 First: when a congressional delegation (CODEL) goes to a foreign country, it is an official visit. Congressmen can go on vacation to Cancun, sure, but a CODEL is a different animal altogether. Congressmen in a foreign country represent the United States, & either the US House 2/
@AdrianBonenber1 or Senate. They aren't there as Seth & Pete, or even as Vetbros Seth & Pete. They *are* the United States, just as the US ambassador to that country is speaking to host government national as a representative of the US & is the direct voice of POTUS to the host nation. 3/