Craig Wright's post-Kleiman narrative:

Craig: "Let's assume I own all these bitcoins"
Ira: "Sure (because I want half of that)"
Craig: "Okay, since we agree but I don't have any keys, the court will order other people to seize and reassign those coins to us"

Ehm... no? Image
Kleiman v Wright is a *civil* dispute to determine what Craig owes Dave's estate (even though the funds are imaginary, Craig was still ensnaring Dave's relatives in his schemes with lofty promises). It has zero bearing on any third parties. Image
Just because both parties agree that Craig and/or Dave mined coins doesn't mean the court certifies it as *true* or will help them *seize* coins. It just means those assumptions are not part of *their* dispute. No one else is bound by what *they* agree on. Image
In addition to saying he'll try to bribe the judge and jury to get his way, Craig makes it abundantly clear that no matter the outcome he will misrepresent it as a "court order" to reassign coins, presumably to add to his frivolous lawsuit against Bitcoin devs. Image
Such a court order is pure fantasy, of course. Even in the case of a complete victory for Ira, the court would in all likelihood just order Craig to pay the dollar value of the BTC amount in question (which they agree on), and it's entirely up to Craig to figure out how to pay.
Even the local Jonestown denizens seem to be struggling to see how any of Craig's bold assertions will happen, to which Craig only angrily insists that it will happen and ranting about encryption and that we are all fools for doubting him.

Okay. ImageImageImageImage
TL;DR: Craig is either a complete moron or he thinks you are, and none of what he says is any more true no matter how angrily he spouts it. But this is what he thinks is his way out of the hole he dug for himself; just carry the whole mess into the next court case and keep going.
There's a very real possibility the jury might order Craig to pay BILLIONS that he never had, all because he can't admit to having made the whole thing up.

It's making a mockery of the legal system. It's also 𝓯𝓾𝓬𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓹𝓸𝓮𝓽𝓻𝔂.✍️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with WizSec Bitcoin Research

WizSec Bitcoin Research Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wizsecurity

3 Aug
Consensus by tweet. 🤡
The BSV chain has been suffering from repeated reorgs from a party with superior hashrate.

Now thanks to this kind of careful intervention, BSV is additionally suffering from a split network as some nodes artificially reject certain blocks, breaking the consensus rules. 🤡
Different BSV block explorers currently disagree on the last 100+ blocks of history, with TAAL-owned WhatsOnChain and Calvin's miners now following the original TAAL-mined chain even though it has significantly less work.

"Satoshi's Vision." 🤡
Read 8 tweets
9 Feb
If you're a MtGox creditor, you should read up on how the rest of the payout process will work (includes a calculator to estimate your claim payout):

blog.wizsec.jp/2021/02/mtgox-…
The next upcoming phase of the process will be a vote on this distribution plan (the civil rehabilitation plan). When the trustee contacts you about this, it is important that you VOTE YES.
The final payouts won't be complete for several more years (thanks CoinLab), but if you are in a hurry, the distribution plan contains an option for you to instead receive most (90%-ish) of your potential payout risk-free and significantly earlier.
Read 4 tweets
31 Jan
@crypto And there it is, the worst take I've ever seen on MtGox. Peter Vessenes has spent a decade trying to scam his way into MtGox, has spent the last few years literally trying to rob MtGox's victims, and you write him a goddamn tribute piece? Delete your account.
@crypto Here, some free fact checks for @mattleising who wrote this journalistic fellatio:

Peter Vessenes never had any "portion" of MtGox; he tried multiple times but both McCaleb and Karpeles rebuffed him.
@crypto @mattleising Vessenes then argued his way into a revenue sharing agreement by promising to provide licensed operations for the US and Canada, but dragged his feet on the actual licenses and instead started pocketing the bank deposits users made through CoinLab.
Read 6 tweets
27 Aug 19
We're still waiting for the full transcript, but Judge Reinhart's order on the Kleiman v Wright case is now available (thread)

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
From the very beginning the judge makes it clear that he is NOT deciding on whether CSW is Satoshi Nakamoto. CSW and his fans have already repeatedly lied about this since the ruling.
The judge takes CSW's bitcoin ownership claims at face value; those lies now only work to Wright's detriment, and the judge seems content to let Wright lie in the bed he made for himself.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(