1./ Does the promotion of 'Gender Identity' normalise fakery? That excruciating NASA video with #Kamala suggests so. Here's where she dispenses "important advice" to the kids. "Don't let anyone tell you who you are." This is a key trans rights mantra and a Democrat touchstone.👇
2./ Of course it's important for any child to 'find their true self' but a black child who says she's white remains black and vice versa. A child who says he's overweight when he's thin may require help. As for 'gender identity' spot the obvious problem with this @HRC advice.👇
3./ The HRC says "Children are not born knowing what it means to be a boy or a girl. They learn it from parents," etc. But when a boy decides he's a 'girl' didn't he learn what a 'girl' was from parents and other people too; the very people Kamala now says kids should ignore?
4./ Democrat policy is to ignore this issue. A little girl who loves rough and tumble and says she's a boy must now be affirmed as such. To doubt or question her is forbidden. You know what happens when politicians lose contact with commonsense and reality? This 👇
5./ Turns out these weren't ordinary kids with curious questions. They were fakes: child actors following a script; one written by the dreaded other people Kamala told them to ignore. She claims not to have known, but there was surely a clue in her own hilariously fake lines.👇
6./ So inept was this video (by a company aptly called Sinking Ship) it even left the impression @NASA have ditched Galileo. Here's a real NASA scientist saying the sun goes round the the Earth. He means people USED to believe this but it's never corrected.👇🤦♂️
7./ Perhaps NASA began to lose its grip on basic facts when it too bought into Kamala's fake gender ideology. Here's a NASA scientist's claiming attempts to address inequality are benefiting women (of the type who don't just believe they are women) way too much. Who knew?👇
8./ How can an organisation like NASA hope to remain fact-based anyway when it can't define groups such as the Q in the LGBTQ it claims to be giving special emphasis? IS there an agreed definition of Queer? Straight, wannabe gay? Or are OTHER people not allowed to ask questions?
9./ When institutions embrace Gender Identity Ideology and its morass of undefined, contradictory notions they, in effect, sign up to the idea that whatever people say about themselves MUST be believed. This is a narcissists charter. It's also inimical to a fact-based approach.
10./ Let's hope those kids ignore Kamala's advice. The truth is we all learn who we are, in part, by engaging with the world around us and the people in it. That's the power of Burns's line "O wad some power the giftie gi'e us, To see ourselves as others see us".
11./ Kamala has been given a chance to see herself as others see her: fake. Her Party had better hope their hasty embrace of gender woohoo doesn't leave the same impression on the public. In a coming battle against Trump being fake is unlikely to be a winning tactic. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵 My latest article is illustrated with an image of a cross-dressing Darth Vader. The reason is that after a series of legal triumphs by a rebel alliance of feminists, Christians, free speech defenders and gender critical gays the Trans Empire is about to strike back. 👉
2./ Already, the lobby's fingerprints are all over the EHRC's Draft Code. It's no accident the EHRC Chair fails to use the word 'women' in this video. She also claims the Code was 'updated after changes in the law'. Not true. The law was merely clarified.
3./ As if that isn't bad enough just 48 hours before the Code was published the UK govt announced it will give a whopping £21M to the LGBTQ+ lobby over the next 3 years. A bribe to Stonewall etc to compensate for the parts of the EHRC Code they couldn't undermine? 🤔
1./ My latest article explores the truth behind an incredible scandal. 3 days ago the UK government announced it will host a huge jamboree for the LGBTQ+ lobby next year. As if that's not bad enough it will also hand over £21M to insane LGBTQ+ organisations. What's going on? 👉
2./ I argue this £21M is the price Labour is willing to pay to keep the LGBTQ+ lobby onside. In 2022 I reported on how the lobby similarly tried to screw the British taxpayer out of £10M as part of a crazy 'Safe to Be Me' conference. Luckily for us the conference collapsed.👉
3./ The lobby had to boycot the Conference when @KemiBadenoch refused to sign off a
Conversion Therapy ban designed to prevent gender nonconforming kids getting therapy. I revealed the 'Safe To Be Me' grift was organised by prominent Tory gays. Who's behind this latest heist? 👉
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex.
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism.
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously?
1./ 🧵 Why did the SNP ignore the crimes of Jordan Linden who has been convicted of sex offences against young men and boys? In my latest article I dissect the culture of a party that led gay predators to believe they had a free pass.
Click on link in my bio to read.👆
1/of 7.
2./ After gay marriage was passed the SNP was so desperate to convince gay men the party was their natural home its culture changed. Soon it began to resemble that of a sleazy gay bar, complete with innuendo, boozing and misogynist drag queens performing at SNP events.
3./ After Derek Mackay was fired for harassing a 16 year old boy it was revealed Nicola Sturgeon had banned him from drinking at Conference. When drunk he tended to grope men. Shame she didn't stop him going on school visits which is how he met that 16 year old boy.