1./ Does the promotion of 'Gender Identity' normalise fakery? That excruciating NASA video with #Kamala suggests so. Here's where she dispenses "important advice" to the kids. "Don't let anyone tell you who you are." This is a key trans rights mantra and a Democrat touchstone.👇
2./ Of course it's important for any child to 'find their true self' but a black child who says she's white remains black and vice versa. A child who says he's overweight when he's thin may require help. As for 'gender identity' spot the obvious problem with this @HRC advice.👇
3./ The HRC says "Children are not born knowing what it means to be a boy or a girl. They learn it from parents," etc. But when a boy decides he's a 'girl' didn't he learn what a 'girl' was from parents and other people too; the very people Kamala now says kids should ignore?
4./ Democrat policy is to ignore this issue. A little girl who loves rough and tumble and says she's a boy must now be affirmed as such. To doubt or question her is forbidden. You know what happens when politicians lose contact with commonsense and reality? This 👇
5./ Turns out these weren't ordinary kids with curious questions. They were fakes: child actors following a script; one written by the dreaded other people Kamala told them to ignore. She claims not to have known, but there was surely a clue in her own hilariously fake lines.👇
6./ So inept was this video (by a company aptly called Sinking Ship) it even left the impression @NASA have ditched Galileo. Here's a real NASA scientist saying the sun goes round the the Earth. He means people USED to believe this but it's never corrected.👇🤦♂️
7./ Perhaps NASA began to lose its grip on basic facts when it too bought into Kamala's fake gender ideology. Here's a NASA scientist's claiming attempts to address inequality are benefiting women (of the type who don't just believe they are women) way too much. Who knew?👇
8./ How can an organisation like NASA hope to remain fact-based anyway when it can't define groups such as the Q in the LGBTQ it claims to be giving special emphasis? IS there an agreed definition of Queer? Straight, wannabe gay? Or are OTHER people not allowed to ask questions?
9./ When institutions embrace Gender Identity Ideology and its morass of undefined, contradictory notions they, in effect, sign up to the idea that whatever people say about themselves MUST be believed. This is a narcissists charter. It's also inimical to a fact-based approach.
10./ Let's hope those kids ignore Kamala's advice. The truth is we all learn who we are, in part, by engaging with the world around us and the people in it. That's the power of Burns's line "O wad some power the giftie gi'e us, To see ourselves as others see us".
11./ Kamala has been given a chance to see herself as others see her: fake. Her Party had better hope their hasty embrace of gender woohoo doesn't leave the same impression on the public. In a coming battle against Trump being fake is unlikely to be a winning tactic. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵Want proof the 'gender critical' movement is winning? Just 3 years ago the child-castration lobby group Mermaids was in court trying to strip @AllianceLGB of its charity status. Their witness arguments now sound even crazier than they did then. 👉theguardian.com/society/2022/n…
2./ Paul Roberts (he/him...surprise surprise) from the LGBT+ Consortium railed against @BevJacksonAuth for suggesting "male-bodied people however they identify do not belong in women's prisons. Or any other women's spaces." Her view is now backed by the Supreme Court.🍾🎉🥳
3./ As other proof of alleged bigotry Paul Roberts (he/him) cited a tweet by @AllianceLGB criticising cops for publicly supporting the trans lobby. This year a court agreed, ruling this kind of behaviour undermines the impartiality of the cops. Whoops. telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10/1…
1./ 🧵The BBC's Guilt.
Defenders of the BBC keep insisting it never promoted trans ideology. Yet here's more snippets from the BBC's own schools materials. In this clip primary school kids are told they can be born with a gender identity different from their body. 👇
2./ Telling children they might be born in the wrong body is profoundly confusing. When they experience puberty they may assume any discomfort they feel is due to this. Here's a woman who had her breasts removed cos she thinks she's male telling kids "everything fits now". 🤦♂️
3./ Here's a clip from the same BBC schools video in which the letters in LGBTQ+ are explained. Primary schools kids are told that Q can mean Queer or Questioning. Aren't most school kids likely to be ... "questioning" and therefore presume Q refers to them? 🤔👀
1./ 🧵The BBC Litmus Test. The reaction to claims of bias shows how low BBC cheerleaders have fallen. Morally. @arusbridger, @bbcnickrobinson, @JohnSimpsonNews, @davidyelland & @DAaronovitch accuse BBC opponents of exploiting the claims. Let me tell you why they're so wrong. 👉
2./ The BBC didn't just twist news coverage to suit the political agenda of activists including its Pride group. As I pointed out yesterday it promoted trans ideology in schools where BBC educational materials argued there were 100+ gender identities.👇
3./ The tribal instinct to protect the BBC meant @RichardBentall ridiculed the notion, claiming @piersmorgan "was speaking bullshit". This Professor of Clinical Psychology ignored the fact I'd linked to a BBC schools video doing just that. Here's where things get really dark.👉
1./ 🧵What’s infuriating about the likes of @DAaronovitch, John Simpson and Rusbridger dismissing claims of BBC bias as politically inspired is the public complained about bias for years. This was @piersmorgan calling out BBC schools material that listed 100+ genders. In 2019!
2./ It was groups like @AllianceLGB and @Transgendertrd who successfully campaigned to get videos like this withdrawn. Unlike well-paid blowhards like @DAaronovitch or John Simpson the staff of these groups were all unpaid volunteers.
3./ No amount of Reith Lectures or Attenborough docs can make up for the fact the BBC actively gaslit a generation of children with toxic ideological garbage. And largely ignored the biggest medical scandal of our time. On our dime!
1./ 🧵The BBC's Trans Scandal.
The censoring of trans issues by LGBTQ+ activists at the BBC is symptomatic of a bigger failure by the mainstream media: groupthink. A perfect example is the influence of that most pompous of lard-arses ex-MP John Nicolson. telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/0…
2./ Nicolson used his status as a former (decidedly second-rate) BBC journo to bully fellow politicians into following his line on the trans debate. So desperate was he to bring 'Trans Joy' to kids he spread bizarre conspiracy theories about his opponents. And lied. How he lied.
3./ As an MP Nicolson even tried to force the broadcasting regulator @Ofcom to sing from his creepily paranoid songsheet about @AllianceLGB the only gay group to oppose the child abuse of puberty blockers. Yet Nicolson's judgement was so obviously dodgy.
🧵1./ So who’s the guy the First Minister of Scotland is cuddling up to? A 2 minute search through the timeline of Sid Khan -“a remarkable Scot” 👀- reveals how dodgy his views are. What was Sid’s reaction on October 7th 2023 when young clubbers were blown apart and many raped?
2./ This “remarkable Scot” (sic) failed to express an iota of horror about parents being slaughtered in front of their kids or terrorists decapitating innocent civilians. His reflex response was to complain there was “wall to wall coverage” of the most deadly pogrom since WW2.
3./ He also retweeted a post essentially justifying this pogrom as a means of terrifying Israelis who “must be made to understand that it is impossible to live in peace”. This remember was posted on the day of the massacre itself. Khan was glorying in Jewish fear.