1./ Does the promotion of 'Gender Identity' normalise fakery? That excruciating NASA video with #Kamala suggests so. Here's where she dispenses "important advice" to the kids. "Don't let anyone tell you who you are." This is a key trans rights mantra and a Democrat touchstone.👇
2./ Of course it's important for any child to 'find their true self' but a black child who says she's white remains black and vice versa. A child who says he's overweight when he's thin may require help. As for 'gender identity' spot the obvious problem with this @HRC advice.👇
3./ The HRC says "Children are not born knowing what it means to be a boy or a girl. They learn it from parents," etc. But when a boy decides he's a 'girl' didn't he learn what a 'girl' was from parents and other people too; the very people Kamala now says kids should ignore?
4./ Democrat policy is to ignore this issue. A little girl who loves rough and tumble and says she's a boy must now be affirmed as such. To doubt or question her is forbidden. You know what happens when politicians lose contact with commonsense and reality? This 👇
5./ Turns out these weren't ordinary kids with curious questions. They were fakes: child actors following a script; one written by the dreaded other people Kamala told them to ignore. She claims not to have known, but there was surely a clue in her own hilariously fake lines.👇
6./ So inept was this video (by a company aptly called Sinking Ship) it even left the impression @NASA have ditched Galileo. Here's a real NASA scientist saying the sun goes round the the Earth. He means people USED to believe this but it's never corrected.👇🤦♂️
7./ Perhaps NASA began to lose its grip on basic facts when it too bought into Kamala's fake gender ideology. Here's a NASA scientist's claiming attempts to address inequality are benefiting women (of the type who don't just believe they are women) way too much. Who knew?👇
8./ How can an organisation like NASA hope to remain fact-based anyway when it can't define groups such as the Q in the LGBTQ it claims to be giving special emphasis? IS there an agreed definition of Queer? Straight, wannabe gay? Or are OTHER people not allowed to ask questions?
9./ When institutions embrace Gender Identity Ideology and its morass of undefined, contradictory notions they, in effect, sign up to the idea that whatever people say about themselves MUST be believed. This is a narcissists charter. It's also inimical to a fact-based approach.
10./ Let's hope those kids ignore Kamala's advice. The truth is we all learn who we are, in part, by engaging with the world around us and the people in it. That's the power of Burns's line "O wad some power the giftie gi'e us, To see ourselves as others see us".
11./ Kamala has been given a chance to see herself as others see her: fake. Her Party had better hope their hasty embrace of gender woohoo doesn't leave the same impression on the public. In a coming battle against Trump being fake is unlikely to be a winning tactic. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ A Puberty Blockers Triumph. The UK permanently bans blockers for under 18s. Many brave people fought for this but ONLY ONE lesbian and gay group did. This was the little film I directed for @alliancelgb about the scandal. It moved some to tears.👇
2./ LGB Alliance was relentlessly defamed by @owenjonesjourno, the creeps at Pink News and the rest of the immoral LGBTQ+ lobby who used government money to campaign FOR the effective sterilisation of kids. With small donations @AllianceLGB fought back with posters like this.
3./ It is worth remembering that only 2 years ago NOT ONE newspaper would take the ad and @TfL refused to put it on buses or the tube. @KateBMwriting was forced to hire vans to take the message round Westminster as she sought to alert politicians to the tragedy.
1./ My latest article dissects the career of a woman who may be one of the most dishonest people in public life: Ruth Hunt. She turned Stonewall into a wing of the toxic trans lobby despite saying she wouldn't. That was only the start of her disregard for ethics.
2./ How ethical was Hunt's behaviour at Stonewall? In the 2016 accounts there's an intriguing note referring to payments of £68,400 made to Caroline Ellis. She was and still is Ruth Hunt's partner. The payments were "conducted at arms length" the note assures us. If you say so.
3./ Ellis and Hunt are still in business together. Tho it's more obviously above board now. They run a consultancy together that teaches managers in NHS Trusts how to use pronouns. And presumably how to tie their shoelaces. If you have money to burn...these are your gals.
1./ Cows and Crazy Conspiracists.
It's good to be skeptical of scientific claims. Big Pharma's promotion of puberty blockers is shameful. BUT the people making claims about Bovaer which cuts methane from cattle don't care about evidence or people's jobs. thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/…
2./ Farmers already feel under attack by the Starmer government. The Dairy Industry was already struggling with soaring costs. So for @TiceRichard now to support a boycott of @ArlaFoodsUK who employ 5000 jobs in the UK based on no serious evidence is an utter disgrace.
3./ Tice says Bovaer is bonkers. Yet the irony is he quotes Patrick Holden who is as bonkers as they come. Holden is up to his armpits in mystical manure from astrology to homeopathy. Does Reform now argue, like Holden, farming should all be organic? dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/20…
1./ If you'd like to read my FULL story of LGBT Youth Scotland: including how the FBI helped track down its paedophile CEO and why I suspect its current CEO is teling porkies I've taken down the paywall.
Click on the link in my bio. It's dated September 4th.
2./ The article highlights quotes from a special session Holyrood held in 2005 to honour Rennie and LGBTYS. Nora Radcliffe (Lib Dems) said: "I commend the excellent, highly competent leadership LGBT Youth Scotland gets from Jamie Rennie." Rennie beamed from the public gallery.
3./ Tricia Marwick (SNP) said of Rennie's group, “the work they do is amazing and I cannot praise them enough.” It “deserves all our congratulations and support” because it “helps young people at their most vulnerable.” By then Rennie had been raping a baby for a year.
1./ Who is Jaguar aiming its new 'Copy Nothing' cars at? On its website Jaguar features a sneak peek at its new target market: "queer creatives." If the company believes this sort of posturing fakery is going to sell cars it is more deluded than we imagined.
2./ The problem with Jaguar targetting the "queer" demographic is this minority is increasingly driving everyone else up the wall with their unreasonable demands and bullying arrogance. Here Layton Williams wonders why "queer" people are all creative. Spoiler: they're not.
3./ It is daft for a brand to hitch its wagon to a minority -the 'queer' identified- that revel in causing offence. Jaguar will end up associated with brittle, hyper-sensitive people who lack authenticity. 'Copy Nothing', says the company's ad. Don't worry Jaguar. We won't.
1./ 🧵 The truth behind that Jaguar ad.
Last week's 'Copy Nothing' advert for Jaguar was so bonkers it's tempting to assume it was a joke or an accident. It was neither. It represents the culmination of a campaign to groom a great British brand by the insane LGBTQ+ lobby.
1/20
2./ One sign of that was a review by Attitude the LGBTQ+ magazine which claimed the fact @Nigel_Farage and @elonmusk loathed the ad proved it was genius. Is Kamala a genius then since they loathe her too? Attitude is at the heart of this bizarre story. attitude.co.uk/life/how-hate-…
3./ The roots of the ad campaign can be traced back to October 2021 when Jaguar tried out bold primary colours and meaningless slogans in ads specifically for Attitude. Then the slogan was Live Loud. Hilariously, @Kantar_UKI claimed it was one of the top UK ads ever. 🤣