To do this correctly, I need to tell the whole story. SO...those who have already followed my tweets on Upper Deck v. Flores (or what will forever be known as "The case where someone filed a pic of their ass in federal court"), bear with me a second.
Or is it bare? Bare ass?
And don't say I didn't warn you.
THIS WILL HAUNT YOU.
So stop reading if you want to keep your sanity.
For the rest of the depraved, go right ahead. Keep reading.
OK, enough theatrics.
This case started innocently enough. It's a lawsuit Upper Deck brought against an alleged seller of a counterfeit UD card named Flores.
If you want a summary of what the case is about, here you go:
And then the case gets weird(er)...because there's a filing from the defendant which has a collection of emails that is supposed to somehow help the defendant's position.
They don't...
...and there's a weird pic of a body part.
Now, since the filing is kinda weird, I assume it must be a pic showing an injury...and giving everyone credit for being adults...assume it's maybe...an eye injury?
But then I dive more into the filing and after I read the innocuous phrase "Notwithstanding said objections, counsel attaches a photograph of his ass," I determine...OH DEAR LORD IT'S AN ASS. IT'S AN ASS!
In #TheHobby trademark news, Topps filed two oppositions against Surujnarine Femy Singh's two TOPPSHOT trademark applications...applications that cover, basically, athletic wear.
As you can imagine, Topps owns a couple trademark registrations on TOPPS like properties...quite a few for athletic wear as well. And Topps relies on all of them against the TOPPSHOT marks.
Topps also shows that it uses its TOPPS marks on apparel...and I think I need both of these shirts.