The issue of Savarkar's "mercy petitions" is so overblown. While Gandhi/Nehru got cushy jails, since they were no real threat, Savarkar got Kaala Paani, hard labor and torture, because he had rattled the Empire
What one writes after years of torture to get out is immaterial.
Meanwhile, there is immense record of Gandhi's active subservience to and collaboration with the British Empire, from his time in South Africa to recruitment of Indians to fight for the British in World War I (and later).
Here he pledges "unconditional service" to the Empire.
In the time period when Savarkar was forming revolutionary societies to fight for complete independence, Gandhi was pledging "unflinching devotion to duty and extreme eagerness to serve our
Sovereign" to "prove Indian Loyalty" to the British.
While "Ahimsa" was preached to prevent any attacks on the British Empire to whom he was loyal, and to undermine the revolutionary movement in India, he was fully in favor of bearing arms in *aid* of the Empire, actively recruiting soldiers for WW I.
His moral gymnastics justified that "serving in the (British) army would develop courageousness in the ordinary Indian"... while undermining Indian revolutionaries who were exhibiting that courage *against* the Empire. Even those who took his "ahimsa" seriously questioned this BS
Even in World War II, India was declared at War by the Viceroy without consulting any Indians. While some in the Congress objected to this, Gandhi and Nehru were the prime collaborators with the British position. And thus rewarded.
"Ahimsa" was not a fraud. It was the best way to aid the Empire. The role was to keep Indians pacified, to completely stop the revolutionary activities which were troubling the British, and to turn Indian suffering into a "high moral principle."
Good article on the relationship and respect that Subhash Chandra Bose had for Savarkar and also Savarkar's influence on Bhagat Singh, who distributed copies of his book and quoted from them.
British Colonial power were not dumb. They knew Gandhi was useful to them and Savarkar a threat:
"those willing to play the game under the devious rules set by the colonists were rewarded for their cooperation and those who tried to scuttle the game were brutally punished..."
"The 'Mahatma' enjoyed his 'rest periods' in jail...in addition to special servants his prison suite consisted of three rooms with a garden... he betrayed the cause of the people by calling off the Civil Disobedience Movement" (using "ahimsa" excuse 🙄).
How @theliverdr pushes ideologically motivated garbage.
In a long post he claims that “science says” Giloy caused liver toxicity; in the same post he dismisses a study on Ashwagandha as garbage.
For the case against Giloy his reference is the propaganda rag, @thewire_in! 😏
The Wire article further references an “observational study” which has a total sample size of 6 people!
No doubt this study is conducted by other Liver doctors trained in allopathy alone; and specifically targeting Giloy “twigs.”
Other than the limited sample size, the AYUSH response states that it is very easy to confuse Giloy with a similar, but toxic, plant; the “scientific” study didn’t actually even check if the correct plant was used.
So this 6-person study with any randomized control or double-blind test, where motivated researchers isolate a perhaps pre-determined conclusion is called “science.” Now let’s see what this doctor calls “underpowered garbage” which was “never done methodically.”
Europeans, particularly Germans, were so desperate for an “Aryan” identity based on Hindu texts because they had very little history or identity of their own.
The Germanic tribes were barbarians with little durable language or culture. To lay claim to Sanskrit and related knowledge allows them to attach to a glorious history.
The Germans weren't successors of Rome. The Italians had history, the Greeks had history, even the British could harken to a Celtic history, what did the Germans have?
This is how they became "Aryan" laying claiming to Sanskrit and Indo-European origins.
Some direct excerpts from the translation of "al-jabr" by Mohammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi, from which the term Algebra comes.
Note this translation is from 1831. After 1857 British and Western scholarship started denigrating Indian knowledge as an explicit policy.
Firstly, the translator Frederic Rosen makes explicit that Al Khwarizmi did not invent Algebra, and that this was "well-established" in scholarship, but that he was the "first Mohammedan" to write upon it. 2/
That Al Khwarizmi did not invent Algebra is attested by many, and even by the Al Khwarizmi himself in the preface where he states that the Caliph Al Mamun, encouraged him to write a popular work on the topic, implying that there were existing works he would use. Which were these?
Translator himself concludes that "at least part of the information is drawn from an Indian Source", based on his knowledge alone.
Many "modern" medicine are also extracts of herbs. But the pharma industry relies on dismissing the original because it can't be patented and yields much less profit.
And they'll attack scientific studies which don't fit their prejudice and pocketbook.
Here is an example of @theliverdr misleads and misreads even their own research in even simple things like whether drinking more water is helpful for health.
With his initial list of "debunking" why drinking water doesn't help, he cites the following article: