Today’s events are like those in Khalde a few months ago. There’s a clear plan to attempt to provoke Hezbollah into reaction by committing acts of violence against its supporters in order to spark civil conflict. It’s an additional element of the ongoing economic warfare model.
And all those people who are framing this latest violence in an intentionally vague manner that suggests Hezbollah or it’s supporters are responsible as opposed to those targeted are playing a part in the campaign.
To be expected from Al Jazeera but this kind of framing is disgusting and intentionally misleading. A protest didn’t spontaneously “erupt into violence” somehow – it was fired on by snipers.
https://twitter.com/ajenglish/status/1448602704411074566
It’s across the board in the media, Reuters is also framing it in such a way that it appears as though those who were actually attacked are responsible. It’s clearly deliberate and utterly shameful.
https://twitter.com/reuters/status/1448570587337662467
“Clashes…. Gunfire Erupts….Shooting Breaks Out” every typical cliche possible to avoid actually identifying perpetrators and victims when it doesn’t fit the narrative they want to portray. 
“..triggered by the sectarian chants and protest decide to attack back”
Imagine the callousness required to report on premeditated sniper fire killing several protestors in this way. Its essentially justifying the act without doing so openly.
Imagine the callousness required to report on premeditated sniper fire killing several protestors in this way. Its essentially justifying the act without doing so openly.
This is propaganda, not journalism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
