This is a 🧵all about Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation (TMVI). If you don't know a lot about this and want to learn more - read on! This is a summary of a great expert focus session
First talk from Dr Gry Dahle (Oslo), on why TMVI is not the same as TAVI
TAVI has revolutionised treatment of aortic stenosis; TMVI is further behind largely due to anaromical complexity of treating the MV compared to the AV - the AV valves are much more complex than the semilunar valves!
Just like TAVI, pre-procedural imaging is vital for TMVI. However, unlike TAVI, much more detail is required around the valve anatomy & subvalvular apparatus, as well as LV size / shape, LVOT size etc
Here, Alison explains the inclusion criteria for a Tendyne procedure. LV cannot be too big (<7cm) or too poor in function (EF >30% only) with no or minimal annular calcium
Predominantly for primary MR patients unsuitable for surgery or TEER
Can be used in 2o MR also
Tiara outcomes here. No immediate procedural mortality. Successful deployment & correct position in 93% cases. Overall short-term outcomes show promise
Conclusion slide - the longest survivor is already >7 years out from surgery!
Will be interesting to see how this fares in the future against Tendyne, which has 10 times as many implants worldwide so far. Is there room for both systems? Probably...
Valve-in-MAC has a worse outcome than valve-in-ring and valve-in-valve...why?
Up to 40% can develop LVOTO...that will be a major factor
I reached the end of a thread!
Final tweet in this thread - data of n=11 from Tendyne system in MAC shows some promise...and prior AVR/TAVI should not be considered a contra-I to TMVI
It takes time to read the paper, read the supplementary appendix, analyse the results, think about them etc!
Some thoughts...🧵
On Sunday I wrote a thread about asymptomatic severe AS and what we knew already from RECOVERY & AVATAR RCTs and what the guidelines currently advocate
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), when performed with care and diligence, can reveal a lot about the valve. TOE isn't necessary in all cases to determine leaflet pathology.
A worked example below:
In the PLAX view, you can assess the scallops of the leaflets
In a true PLAX view with aortic valve clearly visible, you mostly see the A2-P2 interface. Here, you can see a clear & large prolapse of the posterior leaflet
If you tilt upwards towards the PLAX RV outflow (pulmonary valve) view you see mostly the A1-P1 interface
Here, you can see the valve looks slightly different & no prolapse is seen
PE has garnered a reputation for huge profits as they typically buy into a company, aggressively ⬇️ costs whilst ⬆️ profit margins, leverage debt if needed, and then sell, often at a large profit
Does this matter when it comes to delivering healthcare services?
Sixty years ago this month - October 1963 - US cardiologist Dr Robert Bruce published a paper detailing his efforts to devise a multi-stage treadmill test
Little did he know this would go on to become the Bruce protocol the most widely used for exercise testing
A thread...
Prior to this, 'stress testing' to evaluate cardiac function was performed using the Masters 2-step technique, first described in 1935. This crude but simple test involved repeated steps up & down over 90 seconds
Bruce, amongst others, recognized the limitations of this test & set about developing an exercise treadmill test
His initial work focused upon a single stage protocol, but he soon realized this wasn't stressing fitter patients enough & the test was taking too long!