Thread. This story of rampant physical and sexual attacks against children inside Texas's prisons for children is not an isolated incident of "bad guards." This is what child cages look like in every state. We must draw a few lessons: nytimes.com/2021/10/15/us/…
First, this is what Texas's child prisons look like decades after so called "reform." When the purpose and function of a bureaucracy is control, domination, punishment, violence, discipline, submission, and crushing the human spirit, it cannot be "reformed."
Second, notice that almost none of the rampant "violent crimes" against children were recorded by Texas police and prosecutors and judges as "crimes." When "crime data" is reported to you, it systematically excludes crimes against people in cages.
Third, a network of child prisons that itself records 7,000 incidents of brutality against children in a year would require justification even if you are a "law and order" person. These are catastrophic harms that most media don't make a part of discussions about "public safety."
Fourth, these aren't policy failures. We know very well how *not* to do this, and nearly every other corner of human civilization doesn't do it. These are choices, and it is a problem of power. This rampant abuse actually *benefits* a small group of people who own things.
Fifth, like police, prosecutors, judges, probation, and parole, child caging bureaucracies have their own logic of expansion and whack-a-mole. Unless we reduce their size and power, no "reform" will ever put and end to the violence.
THREAD: In January, I argued a case before the California Supreme Court. The question was: is it illegal in the United States for a human being to be caged and separated from their family prior to trial solely because they lack cash, even though they are presumed innocent?
Think about how easy this legal question should be. It is easy for people like my grandmother--she got to listen to the oral argument online and immediately thought we won the case because she believes that it's wrong to put someone in a cage because they are poor.
And yet, wealth-based human caging is so normalized (and beneficial) for prosecutors, judges, and wealthy bureaucratic interests that our civilization is still pretending to argue about this issue in its highest courts as if it's a serious intellectual question.
Thread: There are some important things missing from the media's welcome attention on the humanitarian catastrophe at Rikers. Here are a few more things you should know about it: nytimes.com/2021/10/11/nyr…
First, not once in this story about the deplorable conditions at Rikers are the words "judge" or "prosecutor" mentioned. But know this: the most proximate cause of this disaster are the illegal and inhumane money bail, probation, and punishment practices of local judges/DAs.
Second, people have been talking about horrific jail conditions in thousands of U.S. jails since jails were created. Look at Eugene Debs' fantastic memoir Walls and Bars, or read this fantastic interview with Michel Foucault in the NYT from 1975: archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.co…
Thread. This morning, the NYT published another dangerous piece of copaganda, filled with misrepresentations and strategic omissions, all to confuse the public into normalizing and supporting record human caging budgets. nytimes.com/2021/10/10/us/…
First, the NYT conflates cops budgets and "public safety." Without an explanation or evidence, NYT says increase in cops shows mayors "prioritizing public safety." The opposite is true. How does NYT write this clause without noting that experts disagree?
A cardinal rule of police propaganda in the NYT is that it always subtly suggests--usually in unsupported clauses in the middle of sentences presented as so unarguable that they require no citation--that cops are connected to narrow, vague notions of "public safety."
Thread: I was just invited to speak to students at Harvard about how to pursue social justice in the face of pressure to work for wealthy corporations. As I walked on campus, I passed the Arthur Sackler museum, and it got me thinking about how our society defines “crime.”
Sackler built a fortune in part by pioneering new marketing techniques for exploiting drug monopolies and bribing doctors for prescribing his drugs. This was possible b/c U.S. criminal laws permit the rich to hoard even publicly funded patents that could save millions of lives.
We live in a society in which the wealthy have decided that it isn’t a “crime” to watch someone die by hoarding insulin medication developed with public investment but it is a “crime” to take a dose of insulin without paying for it.
Thread. Here are a few helpful disclaimers for journalists to insert into their stories when talking about "crime data" or "crime rates" reported by the police, or when police ask them to report on a "crime wave":
"Property crime data excludes most property crime, including illegal seizures by police (which roughly equal all reported burglary), wage theft by employers (which is about 5x more than all reported property crime), and tax evasion (which is about 20x more than all wage theft)."
"Violent crime data reported by police excludes nearly all of the violent crimes committed by police and jail guards, which experts estimate to include several million physical and sexual assaults each year."
Thread. Here is the Democratic Party District Attorney in Houston working with local Fox station on unhinged racist rants about "predators," "anarchy" and "violent, repeat offenders" who will "maim, rob, and kill fresh victims." fox26houston.com/news/harris-co…
Know the context: these racist rants come as the metro area has record of more than $2 billion police/jail budget, as "violent crime" is at historic lows, and as all data shows even modest bail reforms have been success. This is how threatening even *talk* of reform can be.
Why are they so scared? Profits for bail industry are declining and officials are starting to talk about investing in community-based alternatives to human caging in public health, schools, restorative justice. First step in bail reform a huge success: