Stilicho Profile picture
Oct 16, 2021 23 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Almost everyone has at least heard of the Huns, Goths, Vandals, Franks, and Saxons, and of their legendary leaders like Attila, Clovis, and Hengist and Horsa. However, few know anything about Odoacer, the general turned king who actually ended the Western Roman Empire. A thread:
It's not clear what, exactly, Odoacer was, although he certainly wasn't considered Roman. Classical sources variously call him a Hun or a member of various east Germanic tribes that had just broken out of Attila's collapsing empire.
The earliest supposed mention of Odoacer is from the Life of St Severinus. The future king, then a young man, met the holy ascetic while traveling through the Alps to Italy, who told him, "Go to Italy, go, now covered with mean hides; soon you will make rich gifts to many."
By 470 AD, he was a senior officer in the Italian field army of the Western Roman Empire. By this point, the Western Empire was mostly just Italy and Dalmatia along the Adriatic coast; everywhere else had been broken off by Germanic invaders and rebellious generals.
At the time, the Empire was dominated by the Burgundian general Ricimer. He served under the Emperor Majorian, but assassinated him in 461 and placed a puppet senator, Libius Severius, on the throne, because as a non-Roman he could not take power himself.
(For more on the assassination of Majorian and its consequences throughout the empire, see this thread: )
When Libius Severius died in 465, the East stepped in to impose order on what they saw as a failed state. The Eastern Emperor Leo sent a general, Anthemius, to Italy with an army to make himself emperor. Ricimer was cowed by his military might and reluctantly swore allegiance.
The strategic priority for the Empire was clear: retake North Africa. It was the breadbasket of the west - its grain fed Rome and its taxes paid its armies. Unfortunately, it had been seized by the Vandals in 439, who used it as a base for raiding throughout the Mediterranean.
Majorian had tried to retake North Africa and failed. Anthemius could not - his expedition represented the last gasp of the Western Empire. Backed by Eastern money and men, he set sail with 1,000 ships and 30,000 soldiers in 468 and attempted to land at Cape Bon, near Carthage.
However, the Vandals launched a surprise attack with fire ships, destroying much of the Roman fleet and defeating the expedition. Anthemius continued to try to rebuild the Empire, but this was hopeless - he was bankrupt, his army was gone, and he had lost the backing of the East.
At this point Ricimer resumed his old games and Odoacer steps firmly into the historical record. Ricimer had never had a good relationship with the Emperor; the Bishop of Pavia tried to broker a true between them but failed. In 472 it descended into open warfare between them.
Anthemius was backed by the aristocracy and people of Rome itself; Ricimer, by the Italian army, with Odoacer as one of his senior officers. After five months of urban combat in Rome, Anthemius was cornered in his last stronghold, starved out, and executed.
Ricimer put another puppet on the throne, Olybrius, but died only six weeks after his rival. This left a power vacuum with numerous generals and aristocrats itching to fill it. Olybrius died right afterward; he was followed by another weak Emperor, Glycerius.
In 474, Julius Nepos, commander of Roman forces in Dalmatia, took his army into Italy, deposed Glycerius, and became emperor himself, all with the backing of the East. He ruled for a year, defeating a Visigothic invasion of Italy and trying to reassert Imperial authority in Gaul.
However, Odoacer, now commander of his Germanic Foederati, and Orestes, one of his generals, schemed against him. In 475, they staged a coup. Nepos fled back to Dalmatia and the plotters put Orestes' young son, Romulus Augustulus, on the throne.
Orestes' power ultimately relied on his mostly Germanic army, who above all wanted land in Italy to settle on. When Orestes refused to give it to them, Odoacer led them in a revolt in 476, killing Orestes in battle and deposing and exiling the young emperor to a villa.
What Odoacer did was entirely unexceptional, except perhaps for the mercy he showed Romulus. What was new was what he did afterwards - he informed the Eastern Emperor that there was no need for two emperors; Odoacer would simply govern Italy under his authority as Patrician.
To his soldiers and the people of Italy, however, he declared himself "Rex Italiae" - King of Italy. His rule was surprisingly successful and even Roman. He maintained the support of the senate throughout, giving them more authority than they enjoyed under the emperors.
He forced the Vandals to cede Sicily to him and his armies retook Dalmatia and Raetia. Pope Felix III had no conflict with Odoacer, despite his Arianism and that of his soldiers. His 17 year reign was the longest period of stability anyone alive in Italy at the time had known.
However, Odoacer could not ultimately escape the fate of his predecessors. His growing power and independence became a threat to the Eastern Emperor Zeno, who sent a rebellious Ostrogothic general, Theodoric, to depose him and rule Italy in his stead.
Theodoric invaded Italy in 489 and, after a series of back and forth battles, defeated Odoacer and besieged him in Ravenna in 490. After a three year siege, the Bishop of Ravenna brokered a peace deal under which the two men would rule Italy together.
Ten days later, they held a banquet to celebrate the treaty. Seated next to his elderly rival, Theodoric drew his sword without warning and killed him, yelling, "This is what you did to my friends!" His followers descended on Odoacer's family and supporters.
Odoacer destroyed the Roman empire, but in a sense he preserved it. He had accomplished what none of the emperors he served under could - consolidating the territories under his rule and bringing over a decade of peace and stability to people under him.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stilicho

Stilicho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StilichoReads

Oct 11, 2024
I feel like I haven't done a good book thread in a while. A thread with excerpts from The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688-1783 by John Brewer: Image
The English state was remarkably centralized as far back as Anglo-Saxon times, with a national system of law and strong monarchy. Opposition was channeled through a single parliament, and therefore took on a national character as well. Image
Image
Contrast this with the far more decentralized France, where the great political conflict was between the monarchy and regional elites and where the estates-general was unable to become a unified political force. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
A thread with excerpts from Napoleon's Other War: Bandits, Rebels and their Pursuers in the Age of Revolutions by Michael Broers: Image
Banditry-cum-guerilla warfare was endemic to Corsica, where local notables waged blood feuds and maintained networks of armed men. As a young man, Napoleon and his family had far more exposure to this kind of war than to "conventional" fighting of artillery and big battalions.
Image
Image
Napoleon and the various factions of revolutionary radicals had their differences, but they paled in comparison to the gulf between them and the peasant counter-revolutionaries, who they viewed as backwards hicks whipped into banditry by their priests.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 14, 2023
Machiavelli (in Discourses on Livy) on how difficult it is to change political institutions that have outlived their purpose. They can't be changed through normal politics (they *are* the normal politics) and someone willing to bypass them rarely has the public good in mind. Image
A major challenge to a state moving from authoritarianism to republican government -- all of the hacks who "were prevailing under the tyrannical state" feel obligated to it, while those who prosper under freedom simply believe they are getting what they deserve. Image
If the people of a republic turn to one man to defend them against the rich and powerful, "it will always happen that he will make himself tyrant of the city." He will eliminate the elite first and then turn on the people once there is no one else to stop him. Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2023
Richard Pipes describes the Kievan Rus as initially resembling "the East India or Hudson's Bay companies, founded to make money but compelled by the absence of any administration in the area of their operations to assume quasi-governmental responsibilities."
Image
Image
Mongol influence has etched itself into the Russian language. It is the origin of numerous Russian words relating to administration or brutality, from money (деньги) to shackles (кандалы).
Image
Image
Russian had somewhat distinct terms for private and public lordship, and Muscovite Tsars adopted the former to describe their rule.
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 13, 2023
The NDS, the former Afghan government's intelligence agency, was actually quite good at infiltrating the Taliban, running agents inside Pakistan, and compiling evidence that the Taliban was backed by the ISI as part of a deliberate plot to destabilize Afghanistan.

Image
Image
Image
The US dismissed this as an excuse to cover for the Afghan government's weakness and corruption. Image
"The American diplomat will be in your valley tomorrow if you want to kidnap them." Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 12, 2023
Thread with excerpts from Phoenix and the Birds of Prey: Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorism in Vietnam by Mark Moyar: Image
Local support for the Viet Cong was not motivated by nationalism or communism (which even many party members had a weak understanding of) but by village level grievances, especially support for land reform and lower rents and interest rates. ImageImageImage
The areas where support for the VC was weakest, on the other hand, where those populated by ethnic minorities or by well organized religious groups like Roman Catholics or the Hoa Hao and Cao Dai Buddhists. ImageImage
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(