I expect Pinker's "Rationality" book will be terrific, but I'm also going to have fun pointing out the places where he shoe-horned his politics into his thesis
E.g. calling this "Fake news" is disingenuous when there was a *true* story where people were called "deplorables"
Here he offers a straw man of Right-wing prejudice
But in reality, people have extremely accurate stereotypes of which groups (including some immigrants) disproportionately commit crime
Here Pinker claims COVID panic was rational
But even if you underestimated spread by 100x (as I did), you could look at Chinese and Korean data in Feb 2020 and know that COVID was harmless except to the already moribund
Pinker is silent on hospitals having been empty
As I pointed out elsewhere, Pinker succumbs to his own base rate fallacy by dwelling disproportionately on A) fringe delusions, B) delusions on the Right
What about all the mainstream delusions of the Left?
I did a text search for "racism", and it looks like @sapinker has fallen for possibly the reigning delusion of our time: that a dozen killings of unarmed civilians in a country of 330 million is evidence of "systemic racism"
It's more or less the same theme throughout
On the same page he revels in this third tier piece of Republican buffoonery, he hurries past the entire trans hysteria by saying "You can get in a lot of trouble if you try to lay out necessary and sufficient conditions for "woman""
So the impression that Pinker gives is that, yes, the People of Science™️ have some fringe members who get carried away sometimes, but Trump (who he mentions constantly) represents a class of modern day Scopes Monkey plaintiffs
More disingenuous covering for the irrationality of his own team
The reason the Left yaps about AI "bias" is not, as Pinker claims, because neural nets are opaque
The reason is that neural nets confirm the prejudices we *already have* about gender and race
"Zounds! By what alchemy of silicon did this computer arrive at the bigoted notion that Asians are good credit risks?"
--Nobody ever
Neither here nor there, and an easy stats mistake to make, but Pinker is wrong to laugh at people who think they're more likely to be killed by a tornado than by asthma
92% of people don't have asthma, and most of those people are at *some* risk of a tornado death
Ok, so Pinker actually knows the stats on the non-existence of racism in policing
I guess he said the woke obeisances about "systemic racism" elsewhere in the book to avoid getting cancelled
Pinker has "Long TDS"
Also, COVID didn't cause poverty, lockdown did
Also, the one thing journos are NOT guilty of with regards to COVID is underselling the vax
At last Pinker pursues the dictums of rationality to their logical end, and concludes:
-Discrimination is evil, except if it's against males
The divide-by-zero-error of Wokeness leaves his circuits smoking, and he hastens on to another topic
This book is not *bad*
He does a good job of covering Bayes and cognitive psych, while steering clear of all the cog psych stuff that failed to replicate
But it's a distinctively sub-par production from a first rate mind
I thought Pinker had the TDS mostly out of his system after the intro chapters, but he goes on to make himself perfectly retarded on the subject of COVID because orange man bad:
If you're going to write a book mocking people for being irrational, you should not recite the myth that markets don't provide lighthouses, nor the myth that masks work to stop respiratory viruses
Mr. Rationality confidently declares that the Wuhan lab hypothesis is a "cockamamie conspiracy theory"
Glad that's cleared up!
Pinker sums up the book thus:
You are too stupid to draw your own conclusions, so outsource your thinking to academia and the press
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Boer's ability to stand up to the British makes sense when you meet proper South African dutchmen. In the US, survivalism/DIY/prepper guys come across as LARPers; there's that gleam in the eye as they wait for your reaction to hearing that they retread their own tires. But...
..in the African dutchman you get this childish diffidence paired with Scandinavian literalness. Guy will talk about building his own house the way you talk about going to the store for bananas. "Sure I make my own knives, nothing fancy, but I had those leaf springs lying around"
And Saffas of British descent talk about them the way you might talk about the Borg, kind of a grudging awe. "Yeah, that town was all right once the Dutch boys showed up, you know they'll just do their own civils, put in their own sewerage and so on..."
A sample of white Rhodesians in the 1960s suggested a mean IQ of 108. From personal experience in that part of the world, I find this believable. South Africans laugh when I tell them that Saffas are the most impressive whites I've met anywhere.
The first thing you notice in English southern Africa is the physical robustness of the whites. The second thing you notice is the entrepreneurial spirit. In Rhodesia, maybe it was selection from among competent and bellicose Scots.
Pakistanis are not weird, Europeans are weird. Australian aboriginals ritually gang rape prepubescent girls, 30% of Africans in convenience surveys *admit* to having raped, Amerindians set records for child pregnancies, Gazan civilians came through the fences to join the raping
Bus just disgorged 50 "inner city" youth onto quiet exurb playground, 17yos now brachiating over play equipment, yuppie parents scattering with toddlers like leaves before a sudden wind
This is the noise from 110 yards away
We are waiting for 20-something scholar to finish using the swing as some sort of surfboard