The Los Angeles and Long Beach ports collectively unload just under one million containers a month. For the last year, they have been running at/near a record pace.
In other words, they are running as fast as they can. The problem is they are at their limit.
3/13
The much-heralded solution is to run the ports 24/7. The problem is the Long Beach terminals are already 24/7 and the LA terminals are already running 18 hours a day. These added hours at LA are only going to increase unloadings by 2%-3%. This is not going to matter much.
4/13
There are also problems getting these containers off the dock.
Unfortunately there is a trucking shortage, which has led to soaring trucking rates (chart).
Demanding more trucks at 3 AM to get these unloaded containers off the dock is going to be a taller order.
5/13
So even though the ports are running at capacity, the containers are going nowhere. This can be seen by the stagnate increase in rail car loadings.
The entire supply chain has to run beyond capacity at once for this to work. Good luck coordinating this.
6/13
This is leading to a backlog of ships anchored off LA.
And since these containers are taking longer to unload, shippers now have to factor in this dead time anchored off shore.
This is a disincentive to ship, so the number of empty containers are piling up in the ports.
7/13
This is leading to a recent fall in container rates. No one is in a hurry to ship these containers back to China for reuse if they are going to just sit anchored off LA for many days. Then one has to struggle to find a truck to haul it away.
8/13
Many think the falling container rates mean the supply chain’s problems are being alleviated.
That would be true if these rates were falling along with the no. of ships anchored off LA, trucking rates, and the number of empty containers all falling as well. They are not.
9/13
The impression by many in the financial markets is this supply chain problem will be fixed in a few months.
They also though the same this summer when Biden similarly convened a meeting in June to fix this problem. But today it is worse than ever.
Why?
10/13
Simply, demand is booming. Below is personal consumption since 09, its trendline, and residuals (actual-trend).
Consumption is off the charts at $662B > trend.
Again, we want a record amount of stuff and the supply chain cannot handle it.
Too many stimmy checks.
11/13
So by ‘fixed’ many assume increasing the throughput of the supply chain to meet overstimulated demand over the short term is doable.
But if the problem is the supply chain is at capacity now, expanding will be hard/impossible over the next several months.
12/13
So to bring everything into balance, prices will rise until enough demand is destroyed to bring everything into line with the limits of the supply chain.
We might be seeing this happening as Q3 growth expectations are crumbling as prices are soaring.
13/13
This is otherwise known as stagflation ... which simply means higher than average prices rises (inflation) accompanied by lower than average growth.
Wall Street viscerally hates this word. But that does not mean it is wrong. Just inconvenient if true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have not posted a spot $BTC ETF update in a while, so here is one.
These ETFs started trading a year ago (Jan 11, 2024). Their total assets are $114 billion. (Note that they started at $29B on day 1 due to the $GBTC conversion.)
Three funds make up the vast majority.
2/5
The net NEW money invested in all Spot BTC ETFs was $36.69B (bottom panel).
This excludes the $29B of $GBTC conversion on day 1.
3/5
The dollar cost average purchase price is $BTC $74.3k (blue line), representing an unrealized gain of ~25%, or $12.73B (bottom panel).
The repost below expresses a common belief that risk assets are effective inflation hedges.
History suggests they are not.
This chart shows that the inflation of the 1960s and 1970s wiped out 64% of the after-inflation stock gains by 1982 (meaning inflation beat stocks by 64%). And all inflation-adjusted gains of the previous 27+ years (back to 1954) were gone (meaning inflation beat stocks over the previous 27 years).
It took until 1992, 28 years later, for stocks to finally start beating cumulative inflation since 1966.
2/3
Too many vastly underestimate the devastating impact of inflation.
Since the 2021 peak, when the Fed called inflation"transitory," stocks have only beaten inflation by just 15% (with dividends).
So a 10% to 12% correct and a little bit more inflation and four years of relative purchasing power is gone (meaning you are no better off than four years ago).
3/3
As I argue here, the crypto crowd also forgets inflation when they make their long-term forecasts.
🧵on yields and yield curve
---
The 30-year yield made a new 2024 close high yesterday.
Now, the highest yield since November 2023.
2/6
The 10-year yield is just eight basis points away from a new 2024 high.
Two trading days left this year.
3/6
The 2-year funds spread is the narrowest since March 2023 (bottom panel).
The massive reversal to negative in March 2023 was driven by the string of bank failures highlighted by Silicon Valley Bank. These failures were driven by fear of unrealized bond losses. So, while the Fed subsequently hiked three more times through July 2023, this spread inverting signaled the "end is near" for the rate-hiking cycle.
Now, at just -5 bps, this spread is the narrowest it has been in ~20 months and close to signaling "the end is near," if not already done, on the rate-cutting cycle.
TLT is the iShares 20-Treasury ETF, one of today's largest and most influential bond ETFs.
I've been arguing that the bond market rise in yields as the Fed cutting rates has been a rejection of the easing cycle. The bond market is saying the Fed has the wrong policy.
Monetary easing is not necessary given the strength of the US economy (See Atlanta Fed GDPnow) and the coming "Trump Stimulus. Fed easing is raising inflation expectations and driving yields higher.
Here is a chart of TLT's price (black) and cumulative flows (red).
From the day the Fed started hiking (March 16, 2022) to the November 7, 2024, FOMC meeting (labeled), cumulative inflows were steady, totaling over $55 billion.
A reasonable interpretation is that bond investors agreed with the Fed's policy from March 2022 to November 2024, even if it was hiking, as it was fighting inflation.
However, since the Fed cut again in November, bond investors have reversed and fled the bond market. Almost $10 billion has left TLT.
2/3
The bottom panel is a rolling 30-day flow into TLT. The last 30 days have seen a cumulative outflow of $8.69B, easily the largest 30-day outflow in TLT's history.
Again, this outflow started with the November 7 Fed cut, which I interpret as the market screaming "no" at the Fed about its move.
3/3
The chart below shows TLT's volume since 2023. The blue bars label the six highest-volume days in TLT's history. No volume day was over 80 million before 2023.
Thursday, December 19, was the record volume day at 99 million. This was the day after the Fed cut. The previous record was November 6, the day before the Fed cut on November 7.
The market is focused on the Fed meeting, not payroll or CPI days. Investors believe the Fed is making a mistake by cutting rates when it is not needed.