The Los Angeles and Long Beach ports collectively unload just under one million containers a month. For the last year, they have been running at/near a record pace.
In other words, they are running as fast as they can. The problem is they are at their limit.
3/13
The much-heralded solution is to run the ports 24/7. The problem is the Long Beach terminals are already 24/7 and the LA terminals are already running 18 hours a day. These added hours at LA are only going to increase unloadings by 2%-3%. This is not going to matter much.
4/13
There are also problems getting these containers off the dock.
Unfortunately there is a trucking shortage, which has led to soaring trucking rates (chart).
Demanding more trucks at 3 AM to get these unloaded containers off the dock is going to be a taller order.
5/13
So even though the ports are running at capacity, the containers are going nowhere. This can be seen by the stagnate increase in rail car loadings.
The entire supply chain has to run beyond capacity at once for this to work. Good luck coordinating this.
6/13
This is leading to a backlog of ships anchored off LA.
And since these containers are taking longer to unload, shippers now have to factor in this dead time anchored off shore.
This is a disincentive to ship, so the number of empty containers are piling up in the ports.
7/13
This is leading to a recent fall in container rates. No one is in a hurry to ship these containers back to China for reuse if they are going to just sit anchored off LA for many days. Then one has to struggle to find a truck to haul it away.
8/13
Many think the falling container rates mean the supply chain’s problems are being alleviated.
That would be true if these rates were falling along with the no. of ships anchored off LA, trucking rates, and the number of empty containers all falling as well. They are not.
9/13
The impression by many in the financial markets is this supply chain problem will be fixed in a few months.
They also though the same this summer when Biden similarly convened a meeting in June to fix this problem. But today it is worse than ever.
Why?
10/13
Simply, demand is booming. Below is personal consumption since 09, its trendline, and residuals (actual-trend).
Consumption is off the charts at $662B > trend.
Again, we want a record amount of stuff and the supply chain cannot handle it.
Too many stimmy checks.
11/13
So by ‘fixed’ many assume increasing the throughput of the supply chain to meet overstimulated demand over the short term is doable.
But if the problem is the supply chain is at capacity now, expanding will be hard/impossible over the next several months.
12/13
So to bring everything into balance, prices will rise until enough demand is destroyed to bring everything into line with the limits of the supply chain.
We might be seeing this happening as Q3 growth expectations are crumbling as prices are soaring.
13/13
This is otherwise known as stagflation ... which simply means higher than average prices rises (inflation) accompanied by lower than average growth.
Wall Street viscerally hates this word. But that does not mean it is wrong. Just inconvenient if true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Polymarket recession odds peaked at 65% on May 1st, the April ISM release date, suggesting Liberation Day and the 20% stock market correction did not damage the economy, as the "soft data" warned.
Subsequent April data confirmed this.
Will May see more of the same?
🧵
2/12
The prevailing narrative in the market for months has been that the labor market is going to fall apart, forcing the Fed to cut rates.
This has not happened, and so far, the "soft" (survey) data have been wildly off in predicting the economy.
3/12
ISM Employment upticked in May from April. The first monthly "May" data point suggests the labor market is still not weakening.
See the red line on the right. With increased tariffs (red line to the left), the prices of goods originating from China are increasing rapidly.
Also note that the Chinese-originated price rise (red line to the right) began around May 1st, the same time truflation started its upward march.
3/5
From the FT:
The Yale Budget Lab says the average US family would pay $2,800 more for the same basket of products purchased last year, should tariffs remain at their current level, with lower-income homes more exposed.
Chinese products being sold in the US have already seen marked increases in retail prices, according to analysis of high-frequency data from PriceStats by Alberto Cavallo of Harvard Business School.
ISM was released this morning, marking the first monthly data point since Liberation Day.
It beat expectations and is not giving indications that manufacturers "froze" or "hit a wall" post Liberation Day.
--
*US APRIL ISM MANUFACTURING INDEX FALLS TO 48.7; EST. 47.9
2/9
It is consistent with decent NON-TARIFF growth.
3/9
Why did bonds not like it (yields moved higher)? Maybe prices paid (tariffs?)