The Los Angeles and Long Beach ports collectively unload just under one million containers a month. For the last year, they have been running at/near a record pace.
In other words, they are running as fast as they can. The problem is they are at their limit.
3/13
The much-heralded solution is to run the ports 24/7. The problem is the Long Beach terminals are already 24/7 and the LA terminals are already running 18 hours a day. These added hours at LA are only going to increase unloadings by 2%-3%. This is not going to matter much.
4/13
There are also problems getting these containers off the dock.
Unfortunately there is a trucking shortage, which has led to soaring trucking rates (chart).
Demanding more trucks at 3 AM to get these unloaded containers off the dock is going to be a taller order.
5/13
So even though the ports are running at capacity, the containers are going nowhere. This can be seen by the stagnate increase in rail car loadings.
The entire supply chain has to run beyond capacity at once for this to work. Good luck coordinating this.
6/13
This is leading to a backlog of ships anchored off LA.
And since these containers are taking longer to unload, shippers now have to factor in this dead time anchored off shore.
This is a disincentive to ship, so the number of empty containers are piling up in the ports.
7/13
This is leading to a recent fall in container rates. No one is in a hurry to ship these containers back to China for reuse if they are going to just sit anchored off LA for many days. Then one has to struggle to find a truck to haul it away.
8/13
Many think the falling container rates mean the supply chain’s problems are being alleviated.
That would be true if these rates were falling along with the no. of ships anchored off LA, trucking rates, and the number of empty containers all falling as well. They are not.
9/13
The impression by many in the financial markets is this supply chain problem will be fixed in a few months.
They also though the same this summer when Biden similarly convened a meeting in June to fix this problem. But today it is worse than ever.
Why?
10/13
Simply, demand is booming. Below is personal consumption since 09, its trendline, and residuals (actual-trend).
Consumption is off the charts at $662B > trend.
Again, we want a record amount of stuff and the supply chain cannot handle it.
Too many stimmy checks.
11/13
So by ‘fixed’ many assume increasing the throughput of the supply chain to meet overstimulated demand over the short term is doable.
But if the problem is the supply chain is at capacity now, expanding will be hard/impossible over the next several months.
12/13
So to bring everything into balance, prices will rise until enough demand is destroyed to bring everything into line with the limits of the supply chain.
We might be seeing this happening as Q3 growth expectations are crumbling as prices are soaring.
13/13
This is otherwise known as stagflation ... which simply means higher than average prices rises (inflation) accompanied by lower than average growth.
Wall Street viscerally hates this word. But that does not mean it is wrong. Just inconvenient if true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is correct that the new home premium (green) above existing home prices (blue) has collapsed from 38% in 2013 to below zero today (the lowest in 54 years).
Why?
See new home prices (orange), they stalled.
3/7
Here is the average home price (orange) and the home's size (blue). The reason prices are falling is that builders are constructing smaller homes.
But as the bottom panel shows (green), the price per square foot is as high as ever.
I assume Marks is referring to the 1-year forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500, the standard Wall Street valuation metric (which is closer to 25 now, but was 23 a few weeks ago).
Here is a long-term proxy for that ... the Shiller Cyclically Adjusted Price/Earnings (CAPE) ratio back to 1881. It is a 10-year average of P/E/ ratios.
At 40, it is one of the highest readings ever, even higher than 1929.
It shows the NEXT (future) 1-year REAL (after inflation) return of the stock market on the y-axis.
The CAPE on the x-axis.
The red box is the returns when the CAPE is above 34. It's a mixed bag of positive and negative returns.
Restated, valuation is NOT a good timing tool.
3/4
But if the y-axis is extended to the NEXT (future) 5-year REAL (after inflation) return, then THERE IS NO EXAMPLE, OVER THE LAST 150 YEARS, OF THE STOCK MARKET BEATING INFLATION OVER THE NEXT 5-YEARS WHEN THE CAPE IS ABOVE 34.
Restated, valuation is an expectation tool. Unless one makes the case that corporate earnings are going to have their most significant surge in history, the stock market is destined to disappoint over the next several years.
The preliminary November University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey was released this morning (blue). The "current conditions" measure of this survey set a new ALL-TIME LOW.
Before 2020 (COVID), the stock market (red) was the primary driver of the public's economic outlook. These two series moved up and down together. Since COVID, this relationship has completely disconnected.
This leads to some uncomfortable explanations.
Half of the country owns no assets and lives paycheck to paycheck. Have they now moved to being angry at a booming stock market that worsens inequality? Is this why socialists are getting elected? Do they want their agenda to knock the market down? Is a bear market now the goal, not the concern?
2/6
Why the anger?
Since the COVID recession ended in April 2020, cumulative price increases (orange) have outpaced cumulative wage increases (blue).
This devastates the bottom 50% of wage earners (and especially the bottom 30%) who own no assets and live paycheck-to-paycheck. They are having to do with less.
3/6
For comparison, the opposite happened in the 2010s. The cumulative gain in wages (blue) beat the cumulative rise in prices (orange).
In this scenario, the bottom 50% of wage earners were able to make ends meet and maybe get a little ahead, as their paychecks bought a bit more each year.
JP Morgan has identified 41 AI-related stocks, 8% of the S&P 500. These stocks now account for 47% of the Index's market capitalization, a new record.
The other 459 stocks, 92% of the S&P 500, are 53% of the Index's market capitalization.
2/5
The list of the AI-related stocks
3/5
ChatGPT was released on November 29, 2022.
Since this date, these 41 stocks have accounted for 74% of the S&P 500's total increase (blue). The other 25% came from the remaining 459 stocks (orange).