This story has just been brought to my attention while discussing the UK's efforts to make trade deals. I wonder if they have now fixed the problem - they copied and pasted the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and accidentally signed up to EU rules. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
Amazingly I even gave a talk about the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement while at the Department for International Trade and drew attention to this issue, but I was not in a division that dealt with trade deals. Others brushed off my concerns anyway.
Any time I said something would be hard or complicated I was immediately shot down by one of the recent graduates, who said it would be fine. Is this a thing with graduates, they're told to be super confident and optimistic?
When I said it isn't ideal to draft something on Google Docs with lots of contributors constantly changing things, one said, "Get used to it!"
Anyway, I told them look at this EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, it's over 1,000 pages long and includes various EU-Ukraine committees to resolve disputes - how do we transfer that to the UK, and don't we need Ukraine's agreement on the changes?
For example: "The Trade and Sustainable Development Sub-Committee is hereby established. It shall report on its activities to the Association Committee in its configuration under Article 465(4) of this Agreement."
How do you roll that over?
"An Association Committee is hereby established. It shall assist the Association Council in the performance of its duties. This provision is without prejudice to the responsibilities of the various fora for the conduct of political dialogue as set out in Article 5."
"COMMITTED to a close and lasting relationship that is based on common values, namely respect for democratic principles...commitment to the principles of a free market economy, which would facilitate the participation of Ukraine in European
policies;"
"RECOGNISING that Ukraine as a European country shares a common history and common values with the Member States of the European Union (EU) and is committed to promoting those values;
NOTING the importance Ukraine attaches to its European identity;"
"ACKNOWLEDGING that the political association and economic integration of Ukraine with the European Union will depend on progress in the implementation of this Agreement as well as Ukraine's track record in ensuring respect for common values..."
"DESIROUS of achieving an ever-closer convergence of positions on bilateral, regional and international issues of mutual interest, taking into account the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the European Union, including the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP);"
"RECOGNISING that such a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, linked to the broader process of legislative approximation, will contribute to further economic integration with the European Union Internal Market as envisaged in this Agreement;"
"The aims of this association are:
(a) to promote gradual rapprochement between the Parties based on common values and close and privileged links, and increasing Ukraine's association with EU policies and participation in programmes and agencies;"
Is Ukraine now striving for closer integration with the UK? Boris Johnson and Volodymyr Zelensky signed an agreement in October 2020, but no one seems to read these things.
I wonder why, considering we were trying to get away from everything the EU did, it was so important to replicate all the EU's trade deals, without discussing what was in them.
Also, is it OK to change the text of an agreement after it's signed, without another signing? Apparently it is.
There's a memorandum to the agreement you can download that says the agreement can be amended via an exchange of notes.
The government has refused to allow parliament to scrutinise trade deals before they're signed, but other countries' parliaments will certainly do this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Again I've seen the Guardian casually using the phrase "as the economy bounces back after the pandemic". Why do journalists repeat this government propaganda as if it's normal and factual language?
Rishi Sunak is set to confirm that the “pause” on public sector pay that affected 2.6 million teachers, police and civil servants will be lifted in April, as the economy bounces back from Covid. theguardian.com/society/2021/o…
Are we bouncing back when companies are begging for bailouts to save them from bankruptcy due to high energy costs, and many energy providers have already collapsed?
I believe that most terrorists, from incels to Islamist extremists are bored and frustrated people - usually young men - who sit on their computers and find an ideology to justify their desires to do violence.
We tend to attribute a lot of significance to terrorists as if they've thought a lot about their ideology, but I think their personalities are the main factor. They could have become members of drug gangs and stabbed someone in a non-terrorist killing. They just want an outlet.
My local Tesco Express was half-empty today with remaining products about to expire. It has suddenly made the stockpiling of tins before Brexit worthwhile.
Of course, some people think I'm making this up for the fun of it, so here's the pitta bread I got that expires today.
I assumed people had seen enough pictures of empty shelves on Twitter to get the idea but obviously needed to provide proof.
The EU's "Handbook for EU Exporters of plants and plant products to India" published in January this year mentions the UK as an exporter of apples to India in 2019. So it doesn't look like there has been a "50-year ban" as claimed by ministers.
"With the ongoing ban on imports of Chinese apples, the EU exporters hold a chance for sizeable increase in the market share. Also, the trade dispute between India and US has halved the imports of apples to India from US providing improved opportunity for EU suppliers."
India may have made it easier and more profitable for the UK to export apples by allowing them to be refrigerated in transit to protect against fruit fly rather than before shipping. How profitable that really will be is another question.
The protocol wasn't designed to operate in reality, David Frost says.
"The situation is now urgent. The UK and Ireland have a huge, and very direct, interest in finding solutions here. But we need constructive and ambitious discussions with the EU which deal with the actual reality." irishtimes.com/opinion/david-…
"Either way, we need to find a way forward, a new balance of arrangements, adapted to the practical reality of what we have seen since January, and based on the common interests we all share."
A new report by the Board of Trade actually contains the line "Without trade, the average UK consumer would be a third worse off."
This part is great too.
Apparently Boris Johnson said last year: "Free trade is God’s diplomacy – the only certain way of uniting people in the bonds of peace since the more freely goods cross borders
the less likely it is that troops will ever cross borders.”