1./ Wow. In the week after an MP was killed a prominent LGBTQ+ activist likes a tweet which suggests it's a shame his followers can't "carry". That tweet was in reply to his absurd complaint about BBC journalism. Does it need pointing out it's not words that fire fire bullets? 👇 
2./ But what a strange absurdity is at the heart of Paisley's complaint. If after decades of Stonewall influence on institutions like the Police, Prisons, NHS, BBC and Ofcom there's soaring homophobic hate crime that's not exactly an argument in favour of Stonewall.
3./ For the avoidance of doubt....(in addition to screengrab evidence by other people). When someone denies something so blatantly obvious does this suggest they lack familiarity with the actualité?
4./ Paisley Pattern: attacks journalism, likes a follower bemoaning a lack of weapons, denies having done so, threatens legal action, demands evidence, when provided says his critics are just obsessed with him, then justifies the original like. Does he know what the truth is?
5./ Why does this tiny spat really matter? Just bear David’s approach to the Truth next time he maligns @RosieDuffield1 or @joannaccherry or other feminists. Or the next time he churns out ridiculous misrepresentations about @ForwomenScot, @fairplaywomen and @ALLIANCELGB 👇
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
