My favorite way of introducing the idea of put options is the analogy to car insurance. The underlyings (both the vehicle and driver), the premium, the deductible, the max payout, and of course the term, all have contracting equivalents to the actual listed equity option market.
And we know our friendly car insurance provider never wins by more than the premium itself, rendering it short the accident. Geico is Citadel, studying its own version of realized vol with computations on accident and theft frequency and the financial costs associated w them.
There is a lot of data to mine including the cross-sections of drivers, cars, neighborhoods and (mis)behaviors. The game is the same: use data to sell auto insurance at an implied vol such that the premiums taken in outstrip the payouts and allow for an attractive return.
In the business of both car insurance and stock insurance, accidents can happen for micro and macro reasons. On the micro front, DWI might pair off with accounting irregularities. On the macro side, there’s little way to escape an ice storm.
The variation in the price of “market insurance”, ie, risk premia like vol, makes for a fascinating study. In Oct 2017, a 1m straddle on the $SPX cost 1.5%. In Oct 2008, that same straddle surpassed 20% I’m not so sure Geico would ever need to update its models to that degree!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A further widening of inflation break-evens complicates things for the Fed even if it remains committed to its wait and see strategy that only decides to act when the evidence of higher inflation is clear (are we there yet)?
Risk premiums become prices in plain sight and they become a statement on expectations of the mean and variance of inflation. The prices also help satisfy the market’s (almost insatiable) need for narrative.
One such narrative might read “inflation break-evens are a Fed credibility metric”. These narratives serve to reinforce the broad market consensus. In circular fashion, what we think helps determine prices, which in turn tell us what to think and what to believe.
The anticipation of high realized inflation and uncertainty around it impacts inflation risk premiums. This is very important because at some point the Fed cannot ignore the discovery of prices in real time, it’s “wait and see” strategy notwithstanding.
A further widening of inflation expectations complicates things for the Fed even if it remains committed to its wait and see strategy that only decides to act when the evidence of higher inflation is clear.
Risk premiums become prices in plain sight and they become a statement on expectations of the mean and variance of inflation. The prices also help satisfy the market’s (almost insatiable) need for narrative. One narrative might read “inflation b/e's are a Fed credibility metric”.