Treasury net zero review is very interesting, in green terms, but also as a mere statement of strategy - eg openly pointing to poor UK productivity performance, in the last few years again the worst in G7 for investment, having been overtaken by Italy...
*Levelling up* code alert - will green policy on cars eventually subsidise wealthy Tesla-drivers in cities, & punish less well off drivers who stick with petrol/diesel for longer, Treasury muses to itself....
Also the £30bn elephant in the room known as “VED” or road-pricing...
Also this translated -
We’ll have to tax gas more and electricity less, because although electricity is now very low carbon/ renewable, we load all carbon levies on to it rather than tax the actual carbon in gas.
But right now after the gas price quadrupled to a record? 2022!
Back on EV point - chief selling points to incentivise people to buy EVs is its cheaper, partly because no VED. But VED will then reduce so much it will be replaced by road pricing, taking away some (a lot?) of the running cost benefit incentive...
One for the 2024 manifestos.
OK Carbon Border Adjustments...
UK no likey. Questions WTO legality and whether
“straightforward” But EU, some big European nations, Canada, are looking at effectively applying a tariff to high carbon intensive goods to prevent “leakage” ie undercutting on climate
UK Carbon Border Adjustment would somewhat complicate doing of trade deals around the world, and we’ve already seen a willingness to not mention even the PAris agreement in eg Oz trade deal... “green trade wars/ protectionism” will be increasing geopolitical issue in coming years
Although this rather interesting chart shows that UK manufacturing is so carbon unintensive that it would be difficult to find a basis to charge a green tariff on the UK... important exceptions here are refineries and plastics...
The review effectively states that “working collaboratively” on “effective international action” beats a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - one to watch, esp those areas where British manufacturing is hurt by UK going faster than others on climate alleviation.
This is very interesting HMT chart - richest decile (10%) emits three times as much carbon as poorest. Though they have 8x as much income on average. Difference is savings. Saving money = not consuming = green,
But 😞- HMT avoids trap of publishing forecast of household impact of net zero policies...
But this it hopes shows that annual bills for power, heating and transport, will be the same via heat pump and EV by 2050, in 2020 prices...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
US customs messaging note quietly slipped out last night shows that smartphones, the number 1 Chinese export to the US by value last year, exempted from the 125% tariff… alongside chips, processors, wafers, lcd panels, LEDs etc…
8517.13.00.00
Smartphones
US has excluded the single biggest Chinese export, and certainly the most high profile finished good from the tariffs, without publicly announcing it…
Avoiding the very public repricing of IPhones etc across Apple stores, but only in the US….
While obviously smartphones/ iPhones being exempted is big news for now…
Here’s full list of exemptions according to Harmonised US tariff codes that I plugged into its database… lots of semiconductor parts, circuits, processors, solid state storage, flat panel touchscreens 👀
Author of Mar A Lago accord concept that US tariff agenda is basically designed to cause negotiated dollar weakening, (now WH chief economist), gave speech yday which basically suggested that reserve status for dollar was a burden which others might need to “write checks” for
turns on its head the famous description of ex French President then fin minister Valéry Giscard d'Estaing the US enjoyed an “exorbitant privilege” with $ reserve status…
Instead Administration appears to believe this is an exorbitant burden for which US should be remunerated.
It’s part of a narrative that seeks to paint new tariffs (accepted without retaliation) as justifiable payment for burden of strong dollar (eg on US manufacturing exports and jobs)… this new mindset is extremely consequential. The tariffs aren’t going.
President just shared a video on Truth Social saying “Trump
Is purposely CRASHING the market” in order to lower US Treasury yields and the dollar.
The Mar A Lago theory I wrote about two months ago, written by his chief adviser that said tariff chaos would lead to $ deal
Here’s the video…
Dow down another 1000 points…
Obviously RT are not endorsements but why is the President choosing to share this stuff? And if you are another country seeing this, how do you negotiate with this?
👀 From Navarro’s numbers auto tariffs will raise $100bn a year (on $240bn imports) can replicate this calculation by assuming all imports hit by 25% and then US manufactured cars taxed about half that to reflect foreign content…
No exemptions tho…
…that assumes no behavioural change.
Note: will be a lot of behavioural change in supply and demand.
also says tariffs in general will raise $600bn a year of $6 trillion over a decade.
As total goods imports are only $3 trillion a year… “Liberation Day” equivalent of 20% universal tariff??
👀
Indeed Washington Posts chief Econ writer reports President instincts are to go bigger on “Liberation Day” … are we underpricing the return of the universal tariff? It would explain the otherwise inexplicable Navarro numbers this morning,..
Might remember I cornered Rwandan President Paul Kagame in January and asked if UK would get money back if no migrants were transferred to Rwanda… answer revealed today: Govt paid £715m so far until June of this year
“not recoverable under the terms of the Treaty”
terms of Rwanda deal are quite something…
In addition to £715m already paid, Treaty another £100m is due (will it be paid?)
also envisaged £120m bonus after 300 refugees “transferred”. And £20k per person payment.
And then further £150k per migrant payment over 5 years
IF a relocated migrant then relocated from Rwanda, UK government would then pay Rwanda £10k for that onward relocation (instead of the last payments above)
Treasury effectively confirms debt rule loosening, by announcing its new “guardrails” to channel capital spending goes to a 10 year pipeline of major projects that generate economic returns that will help “depoliticise infrastructure”
Their view is independent accountable bodies, either new or given new powers will set & implement a 10 year infrastructure strategy integrated with 2 year spending reviews, and audit this, and assess value for money ensuring capital investment generates clear long term returns…
Ministers now openly call the impact of the Sunak debt rule “a mistake”, that it constrained some much needed public infrastructure investment, while not stopping bad investment in failing projects… capital needs to be properly quality controlled not arbitrarily constrained