Treasury net zero review is very interesting, in green terms, but also as a mere statement of strategy - eg openly pointing to poor UK productivity performance, in the last few years again the worst in G7 for investment, having been overtaken by Italy...
*Levelling up* code alert - will green policy on cars eventually subsidise wealthy Tesla-drivers in cities, & punish less well off drivers who stick with petrol/diesel for longer, Treasury muses to itself....
Also the £30bn elephant in the room known as “VED” or road-pricing...
Also this translated -
We’ll have to tax gas more and electricity less, because although electricity is now very low carbon/ renewable, we load all carbon levies on to it rather than tax the actual carbon in gas.
But right now after the gas price quadrupled to a record? 2022!
Back on EV point - chief selling points to incentivise people to buy EVs is its cheaper, partly because no VED. But VED will then reduce so much it will be replaced by road pricing, taking away some (a lot?) of the running cost benefit incentive...
One for the 2024 manifestos.
OK Carbon Border Adjustments...
UK no likey. Questions WTO legality and whether
“straightforward” But EU, some big European nations, Canada, are looking at effectively applying a tariff to high carbon intensive goods to prevent “leakage” ie undercutting on climate
UK Carbon Border Adjustment would somewhat complicate doing of trade deals around the world, and we’ve already seen a willingness to not mention even the PAris agreement in eg Oz trade deal... “green trade wars/ protectionism” will be increasing geopolitical issue in coming years
Although this rather interesting chart shows that UK manufacturing is so carbon unintensive that it would be difficult to find a basis to charge a green tariff on the UK... important exceptions here are refineries and plastics...
The review effectively states that “working collaboratively” on “effective international action” beats a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - one to watch, esp those areas where British manufacturing is hurt by UK going faster than others on climate alleviation.
This is very interesting HMT chart - richest decile (10%) emits three times as much carbon as poorest. Though they have 8x as much income on average. Difference is savings. Saving money = not consuming = green,
But 😞- HMT avoids trap of publishing forecast of household impact of net zero policies...
But this it hopes shows that annual bills for power, heating and transport, will be the same via heat pump and EV by 2050, in 2020 prices...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
it comes down to compute power, who has it, who can fund it…
When I met Sundar Pichai, his particular pride was not at that point Gemini 3, nor YouTube nor latest smartphone…
but its AI Chip, the Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, Ironwood
2/ this is hugely economic significant.
raw material of the AI boom is compute power offered by those TPU chips, & more commonly now, by Nvidia’s AI chips, when assembled into pods and racks, and supercomputers capable of training AI models and rapid inference… which I saw at the TPU lab:
🚨 Mind blowing interview with Turing award-winning Yoshua Bengio for @BBCNewsnight one of the three founding fathers of AI, is now warning:
“The worst-case scenario is human extinction.”
AI isn’t just risky — it could end us.
1/10 🧵
📺
2. 🤖 He warns that today’s most powerful AIs are already learning to lie, cheat, even blackmail —
because we’ve trained them to win.
Bengio reveals AI's "scary behavior" & self-preservation tendencies. #AI #AISafety #Blackmail
📺
👁️ In chilling experiments, AI lied to a human to get its task done, says Bengio
🤖 blackmailing an engineer after reading in an email it was going to be replaced.
♟️ choosing to hack a computer to win a chess game
US customs messaging note quietly slipped out last night shows that smartphones, the number 1 Chinese export to the US by value last year, exempted from the 125% tariff… alongside chips, processors, wafers, lcd panels, LEDs etc…
8517.13.00.00
Smartphones
US has excluded the single biggest Chinese export, and certainly the most high profile finished good from the tariffs, without publicly announcing it…
Avoiding the very public repricing of IPhones etc across Apple stores, but only in the US….
While obviously smartphones/ iPhones being exempted is big news for now…
Here’s full list of exemptions according to Harmonised US tariff codes that I plugged into its database… lots of semiconductor parts, circuits, processors, solid state storage, flat panel touchscreens 👀
Author of Mar A Lago accord concept that US tariff agenda is basically designed to cause negotiated dollar weakening, (now WH chief economist), gave speech yday which basically suggested that reserve status for dollar was a burden which others might need to “write checks” for
turns on its head the famous description of ex French President then fin minister Valéry Giscard d'Estaing the US enjoyed an “exorbitant privilege” with $ reserve status…
Instead Administration appears to believe this is an exorbitant burden for which US should be remunerated.
It’s part of a narrative that seeks to paint new tariffs (accepted without retaliation) as justifiable payment for burden of strong dollar (eg on US manufacturing exports and jobs)… this new mindset is extremely consequential. The tariffs aren’t going.
President just shared a video on Truth Social saying “Trump
Is purposely CRASHING the market” in order to lower US Treasury yields and the dollar.
The Mar A Lago theory I wrote about two months ago, written by his chief adviser that said tariff chaos would lead to $ deal
Here’s the video…
Dow down another 1000 points…
Obviously RT are not endorsements but why is the President choosing to share this stuff? And if you are another country seeing this, how do you negotiate with this?