This paper profiles SARs-CoV-2 derived exosomes but does NOT report any spike protein. If anyone has data that counters this or suggests I misread the supplement, I'm all ears. I was expecting both to have them but the vaccinated to have more due to dose frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Another lemonade in the Vax campaign was the observation that the vaccinated had 10X+ more spike antibody. Some called that a benefit. Other were concerned that the data implies 10X higher spike protein expression in the vax vs the natural infection and spike is the toxin.
Why do we care is Spike is being packaged into exosomes? That implies it is then distributed all over the body and doesn't remain at the injection site. This confirms the Biodistribution data that de-platformed Bryam Bridle @WoodReporting
If its not localized to the injection site.. what do other exosomes do?
They are often exhaled.
Why is that a problem? Its not like they contain replication competent viral genomes.
To understand this you need to know a dark secret about Spike called SEB.
I don't know why SEB is in Spike. No other CV has this. This is a super-antigenic peptide that is often studied as a bioweapon. One of the best papers on SEB is below.
An important paragraph of this paper was highlighted by a friend, tries to differentiate a natural exposure to a biological attack based exposure.
What is important to see here is that very low levels of SEB can create COVID pathologies: Dry Cough, Shortness of breath, Fluid in the lungs.
So we need to know ASAP if vaccinated people are exhaling more spike coated exosomes than the naturally infected people.
Given the high dose of the injections (40 Trillion degradation resistant mRNAs), it is quite possible the vaccinated express more spike coated exosomes than naturally infected people. I would stay away from people fuming exosomes of SEB.
This may offer some explanation regarding the people that report illness being in close quarters with recently vaccinated people. This also begs the question if Vax mRNA is being packaged, exhaled then inhaled in these exosomes.
Clarification- The Prizer paper is not from Pfizer but about their vaccine.
I am late to the game here as I don't see patients. The front line folks have been concerned about this for some time.
It is well known from BioNtech (Lenk et al) and Sutton et al (1997) that RNA:DNA hybrids inhibit DNaseI.
What is less known is that Quadruplex Gs also inhibit DNaseI. Some exist in SV40 and we get the most signal from this qPCR amplicon.
2 Different mechanisms of DNaseI inhibition = plasmid fragmentation cannot be assumed to be uniform in the mRNA vaccines. Hence 100 fold more spike than parts of the vector.
Below is a map of the codon optimized spike where Quadruplex Gs are overlaid with GAA repeats. GAA's are stickier RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our qPCR primers are overlayed as well.
@RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @TracyBethHoeg @DrJBhattacharya
Evans et al demonstrate DNaseI is resistant to quadruplex Gs. They also move to alternative enzymes. nature.com/articles/s4152…
This is from Lenk et al (BioNtech).
Note the concern over GAA sequences and RNA:DNA hybrids.
Our spike qPCR primers happen to land on GAA rich and quadruplex G rich regions of Spike. frontiersin.org/journals/molec…
@LocasaleLab I find the RNAi worship incongruent will how that entire field was ignored when injecting billions of people with mRNAs.
There are multiple 21bp homologies to human that emerged from the haphazard codon optimizations in the modRNA vaccine and no one cared?
@LocasaleLab Receipts.
Take Pfizers vax Sequence and run it through BLAT.
Hello... anyone from the RNAi space want to speak up about this?
On Veterans Day @CharlesRixey @JesslovesMJK
Stopped by MGC.
2 long days later we had all of his data.
It’s now published in The Journal of Independent Medicine.
It describes the mechanism of failure for the DNA contamination in the mRNA shots and why the regulators are missing it.
@JesslovesMJK @CharlesRixey @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @RetsefL @DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg
Another Achs et al Fumble uncovered.
These folks don't even understand Capillary Electrophoresis.
Its becoming increasingly clear these are not honest mistakes but designed to deceive by people who are employed at a Vaccine Research Institute.
Science for Sale.
@JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher
Here is the Rub.
They used a CE instrument that has a lower limit of sensitivity above the 10ng limit.
You need to be able to pick up 10X below the 10ng limit. Or 33pg/ul (300ul dose @ 10ng = 33pg/ul)
This is embarrassingly rigged or they are incompetent.
They ignored our comments on the preprint server and raced their paper into @Nature.
@JesslovesMJK and @DJSpeicher have their own substacks picking up other errors in this paper I'll post sortly.