This paper profiles SARs-CoV-2 derived exosomes but does NOT report any spike protein. If anyone has data that counters this or suggests I misread the supplement, I'm all ears. I was expecting both to have them but the vaccinated to have more due to dose frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Another lemonade in the Vax campaign was the observation that the vaccinated had 10X+ more spike antibody. Some called that a benefit. Other were concerned that the data implies 10X higher spike protein expression in the vax vs the natural infection and spike is the toxin.
Why do we care is Spike is being packaged into exosomes? That implies it is then distributed all over the body and doesn't remain at the injection site. This confirms the Biodistribution data that de-platformed Bryam Bridle @WoodReporting
If its not localized to the injection site.. what do other exosomes do?
They are often exhaled.
Why is that a problem? Its not like they contain replication competent viral genomes.
To understand this you need to know a dark secret about Spike called SEB.
I don't know why SEB is in Spike. No other CV has this. This is a super-antigenic peptide that is often studied as a bioweapon. One of the best papers on SEB is below.
An important paragraph of this paper was highlighted by a friend, tries to differentiate a natural exposure to a biological attack based exposure.
What is important to see here is that very low levels of SEB can create COVID pathologies: Dry Cough, Shortness of breath, Fluid in the lungs.
So we need to know ASAP if vaccinated people are exhaling more spike coated exosomes than the naturally infected people.
Given the high dose of the injections (40 Trillion degradation resistant mRNAs), it is quite possible the vaccinated express more spike coated exosomes than naturally infected people. I would stay away from people fuming exosomes of SEB.
This may offer some explanation regarding the people that report illness being in close quarters with recently vaccinated people. This also begs the question if Vax mRNA is being packaged, exhaled then inhaled in these exosomes.
Clarification- The Prizer paper is not from Pfizer but about their vaccine.
I am late to the game here as I don't see patients. The front line folks have been concerned about this for some time.
🔥Scientific Misconduct and Plagiarism from Dr. Richard Fleming🔥.
The Journal has been made aware of Richard Fleming plagiarizing our primer sequences and not citing them.
I normally wouldn't care. They are open source but the same primer table in @DJSpeicher et al contained the SV40 primer sequences he NEVER used while still claiming SV40 was not detected. He claimed this 3 times but never actually tested for SV40.
Irony.. Fleming was bragging about his work was peer reviewed.
Or Peer stolen, twisted and obfuscated... but to what ends? Who does Fleming work for and did he copy these sequences and refuse to cite the work while spreading non sense about the SV40 sequences?
What are the odds they picked the same primers by chance?