This paper profiles SARs-CoV-2 derived exosomes but does NOT report any spike protein. If anyone has data that counters this or suggests I misread the supplement, I'm all ears. I was expecting both to have them but the vaccinated to have more due to dose frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Another lemonade in the Vax campaign was the observation that the vaccinated had 10X+ more spike antibody. Some called that a benefit. Other were concerned that the data implies 10X higher spike protein expression in the vax vs the natural infection and spike is the toxin.
Why do we care is Spike is being packaged into exosomes? That implies it is then distributed all over the body and doesn't remain at the injection site. This confirms the Biodistribution data that de-platformed Bryam Bridle @WoodReporting
If its not localized to the injection site.. what do other exosomes do?
They are often exhaled.
Why is that a problem? Its not like they contain replication competent viral genomes.
To understand this you need to know a dark secret about Spike called SEB.
I don't know why SEB is in Spike. No other CV has this. This is a super-antigenic peptide that is often studied as a bioweapon. One of the best papers on SEB is below.
An important paragraph of this paper was highlighted by a friend, tries to differentiate a natural exposure to a biological attack based exposure.
What is important to see here is that very low levels of SEB can create COVID pathologies: Dry Cough, Shortness of breath, Fluid in the lungs.
So we need to know ASAP if vaccinated people are exhaling more spike coated exosomes than the naturally infected people.
Given the high dose of the injections (40 Trillion degradation resistant mRNAs), it is quite possible the vaccinated express more spike coated exosomes than naturally infected people. I would stay away from people fuming exosomes of SEB.
This may offer some explanation regarding the people that report illness being in close quarters with recently vaccinated people. This also begs the question if Vax mRNA is being packaged, exhaled then inhaled in these exosomes.
Clarification- The Prizer paper is not from Pfizer but about their vaccine.
I am late to the game here as I don't see patients. The front line folks have been concerned about this for some time.
Posting again to remind folks that spike protein can drive mitophagy.
Now that we know the modRNAs are prone to frameshifting and there is a Mito peptide after the Pfizer stop codons, it wouldn’t surprise me if vaxxed patients have lower extracellular Mito.
While much attention has been focused on the nuclear localization, even cytoplasmic DNA can trigger mayhem in cell circuitry. Chronic activation of cGAS-STING can lead to tumorogenesis.
Chronic stimulation of cGAS-STING can lead to cancer development and Wafiks work just demonstrated that spike protein also interacts with this pathway. We know many patients can’t clear spike.
Let play a game.
Can anyone make sense of these contradicting Pfizer-Regulator documents.
So the SV40 Promoter is not responsible for plasmid manufacturing.
But it’s the promoter for the Kanamycin resistance gene?
The documents submitted to the EMA show they use 50ug/ml of Kanamycin to replicate the plasmid.
How does that work?
No Promoter, no Kanamycin resistance..
No plasmid manufacturing?
They also claim the DNA has no functional consequences.
Moderna’s patents disagree.
Maybe dysfunctional consequences is a better term?