This paper profiles SARs-CoV-2 derived exosomes but does NOT report any spike protein. If anyone has data that counters this or suggests I misread the supplement, I'm all ears. I was expecting both to have them but the vaccinated to have more due to dose frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Another lemonade in the Vax campaign was the observation that the vaccinated had 10X+ more spike antibody. Some called that a benefit. Other were concerned that the data implies 10X higher spike protein expression in the vax vs the natural infection and spike is the toxin.
Why do we care is Spike is being packaged into exosomes? That implies it is then distributed all over the body and doesn't remain at the injection site. This confirms the Biodistribution data that de-platformed Bryam Bridle @WoodReporting
If its not localized to the injection site.. what do other exosomes do?
They are often exhaled.
Why is that a problem? Its not like they contain replication competent viral genomes.
To understand this you need to know a dark secret about Spike called SEB.
I don't know why SEB is in Spike. No other CV has this. This is a super-antigenic peptide that is often studied as a bioweapon. One of the best papers on SEB is below.
An important paragraph of this paper was highlighted by a friend, tries to differentiate a natural exposure to a biological attack based exposure.
What is important to see here is that very low levels of SEB can create COVID pathologies: Dry Cough, Shortness of breath, Fluid in the lungs.
So we need to know ASAP if vaccinated people are exhaling more spike coated exosomes than the naturally infected people.
Given the high dose of the injections (40 Trillion degradation resistant mRNAs), it is quite possible the vaccinated express more spike coated exosomes than naturally infected people. I would stay away from people fuming exosomes of SEB.
This may offer some explanation regarding the people that report illness being in close quarters with recently vaccinated people. This also begs the question if Vax mRNA is being packaged, exhaled then inhaled in these exosomes.
Clarification- The Prizer paper is not from Pfizer but about their vaccine.
I am late to the game here as I don't see patients. The front line folks have been concerned about this for some time.
The low wattage take that any attention given to GOF steals attention from ‘my pet thesis’, is two logical fallacies in one.
False dichotomy and a zero sum fallacy.
It is possible to be concerned about both GOF and lockdown tyranny at the same time.
Like chewing gum and walking.
There are usually 2 reasons such nonsense gets blathered about.
1)someone doesn’t want you to look at GOF.
2)marketing of substacks requires one differentiate from what’s currently capturing attention and appear divergent.
The reasons given NOT to look at GOF are rooted in denialism and molecular biology fairy tales.
‘RNA viruses can’t spread because <insert pseudo profound bullshit like quasi species swarm>’
When you show them evidence of measles and influenza having a higher mutation rate…
The latest scoobie snack is that RNA viruses mutate too quickly to ever spread… therefore GOF is all kabuki theatre.
This is clearly refuted by the sequencing data but let’s assume the argument stands…
Are these folks unaware of synthetic genomic projects making DNA viruses?
Epstein-Barr is a dsDNA herpes virus in 90% of the population. Clearly it can spread and it’s only 172kb.
Well under the size of the mycoplasma genome synthesized in 2008.
These don’t have the mutation rate of RNA and clearly reached 90% of the population.
They also can integrate and reactivate at a later date.
They cause mono so they are clearly ‘risk additive’
Would you trust Hotez or Daszak to be messing with these?
Posting again to remind folks that spike protein can drive mitophagy.
Now that we know the modRNAs are prone to frameshifting and there is a Mito peptide after the Pfizer stop codons, it wouldn’t surprise me if vaxxed patients have lower extracellular Mito.