This phrase, loosely translated in English as ‘travelling in two boats’, originates from the Chinese proverb ‘one foot cannot stand in two boats’.
It is a colloquial, derogatory phrase used to describe those who cannot make up their minds between two choices and so do both. It would be like continuing discussions for a job with two companies or dating two people at same time. Intention is key. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
A good example of ‘travelling in two boats’ is Patralekha Mohite-Patil. She married Samrat with the intention of being his wife AND remaining connected to Virat. She wanted to keep both ‘options’ open and continue both too. That was her intention. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
A wrong example is Virat Chavan because he has never wanted ‘both’ Patralekha & Sai at the same time. At no point did he want to be Sai’s real husband AND have an affair (emotional or physical) with Patralekha. Patralekha stopped being an option/choice when #SamRakhi started.
Virat & his so-called relationship with Patralekha ended long before he married Sai but we agree that some of his initial actions gave Sai good reason to think differently, even though a lot of it was to do with wanting Sai & Patralekha to be friends. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
We also agree that a lot of Virat’s recent behaviour would rightly make Sai question if he loves Sai or not. But ‘do kashti pe savar’ line is an issue for two reasons: 1. Sai forgot all parts in between initial days and recent days where Virat did all to show she is the only one.
2. Questioning whether he loves Sai or not when he isn’t even talking to her properly makes sense (though please see point 1. above) but the leap to ‘he is in love with and/or wants a relationship with Patralekha’ doesn’t and isn’t fair. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
We agree that Sai doesn’t know the full story because Virat hasn’t been clear (though why Sai is intuitive over everything but Virat is still something we are trying to figure out) but being wrongly accused hurts. Since Virat isn’t “do kashtiyon pe savar”, this comment hurt him.
@sidd_vankar actually made Sai say this for a reason: To show difference between #SaiRat & #SamRakhi. Patralekha’s parents made the same comment before #SamRakhi wedding because it applied and that’s why #SamRakhi marriage has issues. They have the truth to address & move on from
Sai’s dialogue was supposed to show us the contrast. It was supposed to show that #SaiRat marriage is different to #SamRakhi. Their issue is misunderstandings, not the truth. It was supposed to be a reminder before the re-introduction of #SamRakhi & as well as move #SaiRat along.
The current #SaiRat track is all about one partner who jumps to conclusions without knowing full facts and another who won’t give all the facts. It’s about assumptions and misunderstandings and the devil of all problems, Virat’s silence. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
In conclusion: The current track is about #SaiRat and their issues. It’s not Sai v Virat. It’s Sai AND Virat and their personal and team hurdles (oh and also #SamRakhi). Look at the bigger picture and it’ll make a lot more sense. #GhumHaiKisikeyPyaarMeiin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh