As time went on, other Muslim League leaders would fire their rhetorical silos on the justification of Pakistan. They would inevitably be tied to not just Muslim safety, but Islamic fulfillment of power & God given right.
Pakistan could only be an Islamic State.
One of the most interesting parts of the Raja of Mahmudabad’s case was the superiority of Islam as an eternal and supreme religion, a Sanātan Dharma in a way 😎. The Prophet Muhammad had perfected & revived Islam which was sent to all peoples over history.
Mahmudabad contrasted this perfect Islamic state with the follies of European nations & accuses Gandhi of encapsulating a hybrid faulty nation combining Tolstoy &…get this…Savarkar to create a Congress Hindu Raj.
OTOH, he viewed Pakistan as a future national model for the 🌍.
Something I want to make clear - all ML leaders were very aware of the fate of the Muslims of UP, the Quraysh of Indian Muslims. From hostage population theory to being mujahideen who sacrifice their lot for Pakistan to an outpost of expansion.
Khaliquzzaman, another ML leader, would follow comparing wataniyat(nationalism) vs mazhab(religion). Ironically, he claims that Indian Muslims would never harm their Afghan brothers if ordered by an Indian Premier.
Seems like only the Taliban are convincing enough today…
Besides the hostage population theory, another common thread amongst ML leaders was the begging of British Raj assistance & promises to sabotage the “Hindu Raj” independence.
It was partition or bust for many ML leaders as demands for confederate federalism failed quickly.
Khaliq reflected a common position of integrating ALL of Punjab & Bengal(& Assam) as part of Pakistan. Demographic expansion was encouraged in border districts. He wanted Urdu/UP Muslim culture to be directly bordering Pakistan as a perpetual influence to Islamicize Punjab/Bengal
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Hinduism, the Jivatman is said to be composed of 3 aspects:
-Sthula: Physical
-Sukshma: Mental
-Kāran: Causal
The Upanishads & Yoga Sutras explore this doctrine in-depth.
But what if we applied this doctrine to India itself? 🧵
Sthula
Regarding the Jivatman, sthula refers to the physical body that we use to engage with our senses & feelings.
It is the physical matter of our body. Our sensory organs help us observe the world.
Our Prana, the life force that sustains us & physiological processes.
For Indian civilization, this is its geography, structures, & people itself.
"The county north of the ocean & south of the snowy mountains..." as the Vishnu Puran says.
India is pilgrimages & structures made by its most important sthula element - its people.
Even those not in the Republic of India today still descend from those who, at one point in time, identified as Indians or were under the local rule of those who did. Genetics will forever display "Indianness" on their faces and cells in one way or another.
One of my most fascinating visits in India was going to Jama Masjid in Delhi.
Some confirmations & other surprises from my priors 🧵
Walking up to Jama Masjid firstly consists of walking through a bazaar up till the main gate & stairs.
Saw both Muslims & Hindus in the bazaar (more of former while latter were less & mostly shopping).
The grandness of the gate is the first thing that stands out to you once you reach. This theme of size & grandness is an important spark of thought as I walked across the mosque.
The mosque is Mughal architecture par excellence.
My visits in Istanbul, Jordan, & Dubai gave me a taste of Turkish & Arab styles, but here is where you really see the “Indo” in Indo-Islamic architecture.
The chhatris, ramparts, gates, “kalashes,” etc… all gave a distinctly Indian feel
With the Marathas enduring a catastrophic result at the Third Battle of Panipat, an opening formed. Pink men dressed in funny coats who had no business in the Indian heat began to show up at the edge of Indian waters.
They wanted to trade.
They were obsessed with measuring. Their curiosity was amusing to many local Indians, but these pink men or angrezis (Englishmen) would pay no mind and would continue to write and exchange.
Some parts of India were rough for them, so they hired local security in addition to bringing their own foreign units. They paid better than the permanently drunk nawab or opium-addled raja and were much more reliable.
The English were rivaling the mercantile castes in their money-making abilities. Arcane foreign financial methods and obsessive measuring grew their rich chests as if they were employing a Miami-based plastic surgeon.
From the rattle of the coin purse eventually grew the rattle of sabers. Humble operations in Calcutta in the early 18th century would transform into a financial juggernaut that possessed the most fearsome army in India by 1815.
The British East India Company combined financial power, military discipline, and most importantly, institutional brilliance to conquer India in its entirety.
The Anglo was the new Ashoka.
Some say that the British “made” India with their imperialism. If you’ve read this far, you know that’s not the case. But why the British are essential in the idea of India is twofold.
Firstly, British bureaucracy and administration proved to be a better way to organize government than many earlier Indian editions.
This doesn’t point to an inherent superiority of the English or the deficiency of Indians; it’s just to say that there is something special about how the British organized society and state.
It’s one of the biggest reasons the British Empire succeeded. Compared to many Indian crowns, the British East India Company brought better rule of law, less corruption, and even better public infrastructure, as more reliable transport meant easier trade.
Money that was spent on a kingdom’s defense and courtly excesses was now routed to commercial pursuits. Early days proved more peaceful under the East India Company, but over time the operations became increasingly extractive.
More consequential, though, was the eventual meddling in Indian internal affairs and society. This, combined with the aforementioned economic extraction, would bring tumult to the British Raj.
In the aftermath of the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, the British grew a penchant for the stick rather than carrots. Increased onus on divide-and-rule tactics would find a perfect foil in the caste system.
Caste was bureaucratized like never before as the British used policies to discriminate against certain castes and create enmity between different ones.
Religion too was used to powerful effect with the bloody conclusion of incitement being the Partition of India.
This is not to say there wasn’t already caste and religious conflict before the British, but the bureaucratization of these identities added new economic and political dimensions to these social battles.
While great kings such as Rana Sanga, Krishna Devaraya, Lachit Borphukan, Mihira Bhoja, and others all resisted the Islamic advance, there is one ruler who stands out.
The Tiger of the Deccan, Shivaji Bhonsle possessed a vision that would become the prototype of Indian nationalism centuries later.
At 15 years of age, Shivaji sought to create a “Hindavi Swaraj” or a country based on the self-rule of Hindus.
This is a stark ideological departure from previous Hindu kings primarily attached to land or caste, with a recent exception being from the still smoldering ruins of an adjacent Vijayanagara, an empire that, in many ways, is an ideological antecedent for the Marathas.
After a bit of dancing between vassal and rebel for the Adilshahi Sultanate and Mughal Empire, Shivaji launched his mission for self-rule.
What initially began as a territorial tussle soon evolved into a war for survival as Aurangzeb sought to eradicate the Marathas from root to branch.
The Western Ghats would soon roar “Har, Har Mahadev!” as Maratha guerrilla tactics made the hills appear to have eyes and bushes possessing swords sharpened by the armor of Mughal soldiers.
The war would drain both the coffers and spirit of the Mughal Empire. With the Mughals in retreat, the Marathas began a marathon in pursuit.
The reality of Maratha sovereignty would strive for Shivaji’s dream Hindavi Swaraj as the Marathas looked to free the Ganga and the Indus from the clutches of those they saw as foreigners of the land and oppressors of their religion.
Shivaji would appeal to Hindu kings to rebel against the “Turk.” His descendants would reaffirm this call as they blew the conch of war becoming a saffron sea across the subcontinent.
Maratha kings and queens would rebuild Hindu temples and reinvigorate Hindu sentiments across their empire, with Ahilyabai Holkar being particularly charitable in restoring Hindu temples.
Chinese pilgrims to India did not note any violence between Hindus and Buddhists during their visits. Barring a few exceptions, Indians had no problem bowing to Buddha or Bhairav, Madhav or Mahavir, and so on.
The concept of religion itself was very different from modern Western or medieval Middle Eastern notions. This is why the arrival of Islam caused such a shock.
An “Other” was indeed recognized.
While early Indians had the concept of “Mleccha” denoting people who did not follow Vedic lifestyles, there were no mass mandates for violence against them.
This contrasted with the levels of religious persecution and conflict that appeared as Islam entered India. Waves of Islamic invasions from Central Asia would leave parts of India as wastelands.
Temples were destroyed and looted, Hindus were enslaved and carried off to the steppe, and many Indians were faced with the choice of conversion or death.
Nomadic horse archers invading from the grasslands of central Asia were a regular feature for India. And indeed, each wave was laced with cruelty.
But the Scythians, Huns, and other invaders who came to India prior assimilated, becoming Indians themselves as they bowed to Indian gods.
But this recent bout of Muslim Turks was different.
Across their own chronicles, Islamic invaders gloat about the terror they wrought upon India and its unbelievers.
A holy war envelops each campaign into the subcontinent. The killings of Hindus and the looting of their temples are recounted with glee and pride.
When Turks actually started to settle in India, they would adopt a caste system of their own, this time based on ethnicity, with Turks and other Muslim Middle Eastern ethnicities at the top.
They would not tolerate being ordered around by a dark, wretched Indian even if they were their Muslim brother in faith.
Beneath converted Muslims was the mass of Hindus who frivolously obsessed over their own increasingly calcifying caste system.