Notice that the US cost for 80% reduction by 2050 of 5.6% of GDP fits very well with the average cost from the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum estimate of 80% reduction for the EU of 5.14% of GDP (avg of 6 models, ignoring WorldScan extreme cost estimate) worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.114…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2025 data from Jan 1-Sept 2 shows 80% as much burned area as normally for same period 2012-24 from Global Wildfire Information System, gwis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/apps/gwis.stat…
Light blue data shows extrapolation on current trajectory to full 2025
In 2025, the world is burning less, not more
That's contrary to the climate narrative
2025 has seen extraordinarily little fire in Africa, much less than average, and even less than the minimum, from 2012-24
"By continuously reducing inertia, Spain’s policymakers engineered a vulnerability."
"Spain’s electrical grid was operating with very little margin for error, a risky game that the Spanish government has been playing more aggressively each year since energy-transitionist ideologues took power two decades ago."
The myth that the green energy transition is inevitable and will make cheap electricity for everyone is one of the most dangerous self-delusions of the global elite