In this episode, co-hosts @orangeasm & @MaxSeijo argue that the pandemic not only killed neoliberalism as a tacit ideological formation; it also revealed how neoliberal truisms have never captured the actual causal mechanisms and potentials that defined the past 50 years. 2/7
Fleshing out these claims, Naty and Maxx journey through the work of rockstar economic historian @adam_tooze, focusing in particular on his widely-hailed recent book, Shutdown: How Covid Shook the World’s Economy (2021). 3/7
Naty & Maxx affirm Tooze’s characteristically thorough demonstration of the myriad ways that the world-wide response to the pandemic, however inadequate, dismantled the pillars of neoliberal governance. 4/7
Yet they critique the elitist complicity of Tooze’s methodological commitment to historical immanence and inevitability, tracing such impulses to back to John Maynard Keynes’ fatal dismissal of Abba Lerner’s proposal to do away with balanced budgets and revenue-constraints. 5/7
For the Superstructure crew, by contrast, proceeding “in medias res,” as Tooze puts it, requires an abolitionist attunement to genuine conditions of injustice and possibility, from #Defund and ongoing labor strikes to contests over #MintTheCoin and the Green New Deal. 6/7
As announced in today's @dealbook, the @ecashact directs the Secretary of the @USTreasury to develop & pilot digital dollar technologies that replicate the privacy-respecting features of physical cash. 2/6
Recognizing the @USTreasury as an institution ideally suited to managing a digital U.S. dollar, the Act treats monetary inclusion & privacy as political rights & public goods. 3/6
"Given that money was politicized for such long periods, the current rise of politicization is much less surprising than it might appear at first sight. There’s a lot of history." 1/4 mronline.org/2019/09/13/mon…
"This is not something that emerges out of nothing. It’s clear that in the decade since Occupy Wall Street, MMT has punctured monetary silence." 2/4
"And given what I’ve said about moral economies, many people are really electrified by this idea of being able to understand money." 3/4
“One of the misconceptions is that in the medieval period—and this is a narrative I do not agree with—it was a Church dominated society, it was an agrarian society and the economy was static." [Thread 1/7]
"In the twelfth and thirteen century, we see what medievalists would refer to as a commercial revolution ... and the Church is put in a position in which they can no longer hold the line against usury, but they have to give in to the market." [2/7]
"So, we have a model where market and religion are in conflict, ... religion has to give way to the progressive of market society. And in fact, what is happening is really different." [3/7]