Extremely speculative hypothesis:

1. BITO hits BTC futures position limits and the CME doesn’t make an exception. (Big *if*)
2. BITO must rotate to longer dated contracts to outrun the limits. That increases their portfolio’s duration and blows out contango across the curve.
3. Higher cash-and-carry on the CME futs sucks out capital from the basis trade on perps at FTX and Binance. That blows out the basis in altcoin perps.
4. Attracted by higher carry, crypto native basis traders sponge up all available DeFi capital to finance leverage
5. That blows out the yields in DeFi. First from direct demand for lending. But second from higher liquidity fees from a frenzy of activity.
6. Already high DeFi yields blow out, attracting significantly more capital to the space. TVLs pump hard across the board.
7. DeFi token season. Major DeFi tokens go from being the most underperforming sector of this rally to surpassing their April ETH denominated highs.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Colkitt

Doug Colkitt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @0xdoug

1 Oct
1/ Great, thread. But I strongly disagree with this sub-point. The vast majority of HFT MM alpha realizes in under 1 second post-fill. Even to the extent that retail flow is toxic cuz “apes strong together”, it’s impossible for WSB to sync activity at millisecond timeframes.
2/ You don’t have to take my word for it. Just look at the relative distribution of which firms excel in which areas. If PFOF was linked to an informational advantage, we’d expect the firms with the most captive retail flow to have the strongest alphas.
3/ And we’d expect the firms with the strongest alphas to have the highest rate of liquidity taking aggressor trading on the lit exchanges. Larger magnitude alphas mean you’re more likely to have signal which exceed [spread]+[fees]
Read 18 tweets
25 Sep
1/ Agree. Without the benefit of hindsight, it’s hard to distinguish network externalities from pure Ponzis. In their growth phase they sure look similar: “this thing has little intrinsic value now, but we‘ll get rich by getting new people in, who in turn will get more new users”
2/ Facebook’s a trillion dollar company primarily because everyone uses Facebook. Its early users contributed enormous value to the company. If not for outdated securities laws, it would been fair and made sense for early Facebook users to receive equity in the network.
3/ The more users and activity they brought into the network, the more equity they should have received. That would have felt very Ponzi-ish from the outside.
Read 8 tweets
14 Sep
1/ Over the past year DeFi has been heavily colonized by HFT emigres. A lot of us come in with an arrogant attitude that we’re much smarter than the DeFi native folks. We naturally assume that however we did things in CeFi must be better. (🙋‍♂️I’ve certainly been guilty of this)
2/ Unfortunately I think Serum has been a victim of this attitude. AMMs have served DeFi very well. But the HFT folks behind Solana and Serum naturally assumed that limit order books must be superior because that’s how CeFi does it.
3/ CLOBs have a lot of major advantages in terms of price discovery and capital efficiency. But they’re much less resilient than AMMs. Today’s outage shows a major downside with CLOBs.
Read 8 tweets
31 Aug
1/ A lot of quant traders (including myself at many times) have a knee jerk instinct to believe that if a strategy is technically challenging it must mean there’s more alpha underneath.
2/ Anyone with experience will tell you this just isn’t true. Even knowing this, it’s still hard to think outside the implicit bias of hard equals lucrative.
3/ I’ve seen insanely complex strategies requiring teams of PhDs, where the alpha was competed down to next to nothing. These teams persisted picking up scraps well past the point it made any economic sense.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(