Seth Abramson Profile picture
Oct 21, 2021 30 tweets 11 min read Read on X
(WILLARD HOTEL WAR ROOM THREAD) Now that Congress has acknowledged the 8 months of reporting at PROOF on Trump's pre-insurrection Willard Hotel "war room," I'm creating a thread with links to every Willard report at PROOF.

Please RETWEET if you think this reporting is important. Image
(NOTE) Some of these reports are free to the public, some are for subscribers only. A subscription to PROOF is just $5/mo, can be cancelled any time, and gives you access to 180 reports—totaling several hardcover books' worth of content—on the insurrection and other vital topics.
1/ After months of writing about the war council held by Trump's inner circle at Trump International on January 5—reporting that was then covered both domestically and internationally—PROOF turned to the Willard war room over 4 months ago with this report: sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
2/ After outlining the basics of the war room, PROOF turned to logistical questions: what was its layout, how many people attended, who was in the hotel during Insurrection Week, were there other Willard war rooms—there were—and so on. That report is here: sethabramson.substack.com/p/inside-the-w…
3/ Using photos stupidly posted online by insurrectionist Robert Hyde—a well-connected far-right dirty trickster I first wrote about in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption (Macmillan)—PROOF then began crowd-sourcing IDs on additional war room participants. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
4/ The discovery that domestic extremist Joe Oltmann was a war room participant led to a lawsuit threat from Oltmann and false claims about whether he'd called Giuliani's Willard suite a "war room." More research revealed OANN-DHS-Trump campaign collusion. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
5/ It soon became impossible to talk about Giuliani's war room at the Willard Hotel without also talking about Stone's war room there—an easy walk from Giuliani's.

It became impossible because Stone, who can never shut his mouth, started talking about it. sethabramson.substack.com/p/roger-stone-…
6/ PROOF next turned to the most obvious and pressing question about all of the pre-insurrection pro-Trump war rooms at the Willard Hotel—there were three—which is this: what were they for? PROOF began answering the question as to Giuliani's war room here: sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
7/ Of course, the question wasn't just why the Willard war room participants gathered in the war room, but what communications they were sending *out* of that room to help coordinate the January 6 insurrection. The answers to that question were harrowing. sethabramson.substack.com/p/the-troublin…
8/ PROOF then—and this is still in June 2021, when no one was discussing the Willard—wrote up an overview of *every* Trumpist war room convened across D.C. on January 4, January 5, and January 6 so that Americans could see the full picture of the plotting. sethabramson.substack.com/p/exclusive-a-…
9/ Certain of the incidents at the Willard that PROOF reported on in June 2021 continue to go unreported elsewhere—for instance, a highly coordinated arson at the Willard on Insurrection Eve that helped set off a planned riot at BLM Plaza 30 minutes later. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
10/ PROOF then returned (we're now at almost exactly four months ago, in late June) to the pressing question of what Rudy Giuliani and his team were doing inside the Willard Hotel "war room." And the level of seditious premeditation uncovered was stunning. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
11/ A major break in PROOF's exclusive reporting on the Willard came on the last day of June 2021, with the crowd-sourced revelation of who the mysterious "man in the white shirt" was in Robert Hyde's photos. It turned out he's a domestic extremist leader. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
(INTERLUDE)

1⃣ Members of Congress read this research as it was published.
2⃣ Many have now stolen this research to claim it as their own.
3⃣ When Woodward published PERIL in late September, media falsely declared him the first to write about the Willard.
sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-some-n…
12/ In early July 2021, PROOF—having written about the Willard Hotel for well over a month—turned to the question of coordination *between* Willard war rooms, taking a deep dive into Roger Stone's war room, its occupants, its purpose, and its dissolution. sethabramson.substack.com/p/roger-stone-…
13/ Just as PROOF's exclusive "Insurrection Eve Willard arson" report had shown that events outside the Willard implicated Stone, PROOF discovered that the video of Stone's return to the hotel on Insurrection Eve contained a shocking, unreported discovery. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
14/ While most of what Giuliani was doing in the Willard war room involved insurrection, *some* of it involved implausible legal maneuvers that dovetailed with what paramilitaries aimed to accomplish on Insurrection Day. PROOF began reporting on that here: sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
15/ PROOF continued reporting on how the "Gohmert suit" was seen as an ultimate Hail Mary for the Trump presidency by the ragtag Trump legal team that gathered at the Willard Hotel during Insurrection Week—and how the suit required violence at the Capitol. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
16/ Having written extensively on Willard Hotel war room participants Giuliani, Luelsdorff, Oltmann, Bobb, and others, PROOF turned its attention to the man who called himself "Trump's lawyer," and who was in the Oval with Trump on January 4: John Eastman. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
17/ When Woodward's extremely tardy reporting on the Willard war room came out in late September—falsely hailed by media as the first revelation of such a room—PROOF quickly curated it into the (by then) massive stock of reporting it'd done on the subject. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
(INTERLUDE 2) And now for a twist! I said PROOF began reporting on Trump's "war room" in early June, but of course PROOF subscribers know this isn't true—as PROOF began reporting on pre-insurrection war rooms just 20 days after January 6, with this report: sethabramson.substack.com/p/january-5-me…
18/ PROOF's reporting on the Trump International Hotel "war council"—which covers too many reports (more than a dozen) for me to include here (you can find them at PROOF, many for free)—quickly turned to the *Willard Hotel*. This was still in January 2021. sethabramson.substack.com/p/what-michael…
19/ Not only did PROOF first publish the photographs Robert Hyde posted on Instagram of Giuliani's Willard war room in late January 2021—8 months before PERIL was released—it also began focusing on a war room in the Willard no one discusses: InfoWars'. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-mic…
20/ As soon as PROOF began writing on the Willard, Roger Stone threatened to sue me. Then Michael Flynn threatened to sue me. Then Joe Oltmann threatened to sue me. All these were public threats.

By looking at Alex Jones, I was getting closer to *them*. sethabramson.substack.com/p/the-five-mus…
21/ Most folks don't realize that the highest-traffic, most "celebrity"-laden war room at the Willard Hotel on January 5 wasn't Giuliani's—it was Alex Jones's. Roger Stone was there. Michael Flynn was there. Patrick Byrne—who's contacted me also—was there. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
22/ Indeed, Stone and Jones *couldn't stop talking publicly* about the Willard—so PROOF kept reporting what they said about their activities there.

All this reporting happened back in March 2021, more than half a year before Woodward wrote on the Willard. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
23/ It turned out that Alex Jones was—and is—central to everything. We know Trump spoke to Giuliani and Bannon pre-insurrection, but PROOF was able to report over and over again about Trump's contacts with Jones, the January 6 march's "leader", pre-attack. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
24/ In the midst of all this spring 2021 reporting at PROOF on the pro-Trump war rooms at Trump International and the Willard—and for that matter, other locations discussed in detail at PROOF—PROOF wrote a comprehensive overview of Trump's January 6 plan: sethabramson.substack.com/p/here-is-the-…
25/ I hope that—via this relatively brief thread—I've given you a quick primer on just a *few* of the 180 articles at PROOF, most of which are detailed investigative reports on the insurrection just like these (some of them even more important than these). sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
(PS) If you found the information in this thread helpful, I hope you'll support my further research on the insurrection by subscribing to PROOF ($5/month). PROOF is the #1-ranked culture substack in the United States and is doing work major media will not. sethabramson.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Apr 2
We're in Week 5 of Trump's 2-week non-war. If we give the non-war war 2-3 more weeks it'll wrap up "weeks" ahead of schedule. Trump destroyed 100% of the 1/3rd of Iran's Navy that's non-IRGC and 0.5% of Iran's Army—i.e. all of it. Its nuke program exists *and* doesn't. Questions?
Tonight Trump explained that Iran was an imminent threat to destroy Israel because it never came close to doing so in 47 years. He explained that this non-war war is technically his third non-war war with Iran, as he won the first one in early 2020 by not fighting it. Questions?
Iran is both 10 years away from developing a missile that can hit America and also would have done so 10 years in the *past* if Trump didn't kill a guy. We know Iran has had its regime decapitated because it has the same president today it had before the war started. Questions?
Read 8 tweets
Mar 20
(1 of 2) This is inaccurate—and the truth is worse. She was already detained, and when Trump's pal heard that he contacted the White House to demanded she be deported so he'd get custody of their child. The White House complied.

I don't know what to call that, but it's criminal.
(2 of 2) But wait, it gets worse! The Trump pal demanding Trump execute a government action for his benefit has evidence on Trump's past sex crimes—which means that this situation reeks of both Bribery and Extortion.

The former is impeachable *and* criminal, the latter criminal.
MORE: Here's the full story. I know it means nothing to say this anymore, but just this one situation—as it apparently involves felonies, impeachable offenses, ripping a mother from her child, and the covering up of sex crimes—is a Watergate-level scandal.
nytimes.com/2026/03/20/us/…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18
It looks like we have to go over this YET AGAIN for all the corporate media journalists in the back: Markwayne Mullin was selected by Trump—as are ALL Trump peons—on the basis of him having no scruples and being willing to do as he's told.

EVERYTHING he's saying today is a lie.
America has gone through this dance too many times to go through it again. Stephen Miller and others craft narratives for nominees to deliver to Congress if they think those nominations are uncertain. The narratives have nothing to do with what the nominees are tasked with doing.
They can play this game because they know that corporate media in this era has decided to act as a stenographer for whatever any liars say rather than providing any context or counterweight whatsoever.

Everything Mullin is saying is contrary to everything we know his boss plans.
Read 19 tweets
Mar 16
I do think to myself, sometimes, as an agnostic, that if there weren't only a God but a highly engaged and attentive God as evangelicals believe, that God would have in some celestial way far beyond our understanding struck down this piece of shit harder than any human in history
There's a level of hypocrisy only humans notice, then there's a level of hypocrisy so galactically astounding I think the absence of celestial retribution in the face of it may be the strongest argument yet that God doesn't exist

I remain unsure, but this tries my doubt *sorely*
What people misunderstand about Donald Trump is that they think either he believed what he was saying in 2008 or that he believes what he is saying in 2026, when of course the reality is that he was lying both times and has never in his whole miserable life believed in *anything*
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
(🧵) BREAKING NEWS THREAD: Those who've been reading PROOF OF DEVILRY—the largest exposé of the Trump-Epstein Scandal—are cheering today. Congressional questioning confirms my reporting that one way Epstein helped interfere in the 2016 election was illegal campaign contributions.
1/ As PROOF OF DEVILRY reported, these payments were part of an effort—involving everyone from Michael Cohen to MBS (of Saudi Arabia) and Marc Kasowitz to David Pecker of the National Enquirer—to pay off Trump women. mediaite.com/media/news/bom…
2/ These criminals believed—correctly—that Trump couldn't be elected otherwise. The effort was domestic and international and constituted a criminal conspiracy involving election fraud, illegal donations, tax fraud and illegal foreign election interference. Trump was aware of it.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 5
There's no reason for Iran to attack NATO nation Turkey—but a drone did. Iran denies sending it.

There's no reason for Iran to attack a UK base in Cyprus—but a drone did. Iran denies sending it.

Now Azerbaijan has been attacked. Iran denies involvement.

I think this is Israel.
I say this for a reason. Right after the illegal invasion, US media reported that America and Israel had reverse-engineered the Shahed drone and had essentially identical copies of it. Evidence suggests these suspicious strikes are coming from Lebanon—where the IDF is positioned.
The Iranian defense strategy isn't opaque—it's transparent. It's firing at Israel and nations that host *American* bases. What's wholly inconsistent with that is the idea that it would attempt to bring the full force of NATO against it by firing on Turkey and a UK base in Cyprus.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(