Based on cursory reading, it’s possible that vasopressin is responsible for bonding while under stress. Oxytocin helps us bond during love and happiness which would not activate under stress. But vasopressin can bond to oxytocin receptors and help us connect when stressed.
Vasopressin is also more prevalent in male mammals, especially social mammals. That may explain why men bond better during shared stressful activity like war while women bond better during emotional vulnerability.
This appears to explain further why men bond best while protecting or providing for) their loved ones. Acting out of love is vasopressin while loving in leisure is oxytocin. We already know men don’t bond through sex via oxytocin like women do, but do bond through stress trials.
This appears to explain the human need for both security and excitement in human pairbonding. It joins the couple through both oxytocin and vasopressin. Refreshing each in their turns can extend the life of the bond.
This appears to explain why after trauma a person may bond almost exclusively through vasopressin even if they struggle to bond at all through oxytocin. Their brain learns to bond only through stress.
This may explain why some women with severe early life trauma struggle to bond to their children, since women bond with their children largely through oxytocin especially at vaginal birth and through breastfeeding.
This passage may explain why some traumatized men who’ve experienced little kindness in life may “soften” to everyone when they have someone they love who can provide them with oxytocin, for example a child or patient partner.
Low oxytocin, decreased lactation? Might explain stressed moms struggling to produce milk.
Your life experiences change your oxytocin and vasopressin reception.
Protection and defense of self tied to vasopressin which is higher in males. Males and females respond chemically different to that need to defend.
Ever heard a traumatized veteran say they wish they could go back to the war? This may be why. Their anxiety actually goes down in those environments once they’ve been conditioned to them.
This passage explains PTSD aggression and insomnia in men.
Here’s where men and women differ. After orgasm, women bond to their partner via oxytocin. But men appear to bond through vasopressin which makes them sexually protective of their reproductive partner. She says “We’re so in love” and he says “Nobody touch my stuff.”
Oxytocin not only makes you feel close to certain people but may make you more likely to want to be close to more people. Does a lack of oxytocin produce the opposite desire?
This passage may explain why young people today are not seeking relationships. Their pathways may be blocked so they just don’t seek bonds.
Excessively high doses of oxytocin at birth makes females later prefer strangers. 🤔
This may explain why a person who receives very little love and who finally enters an oxytocin-generating relationship may become hyper-jealous and protective of their mate.
If anyone reading needs a primer on oxytocin.
Here is why women may be more sensitive to PTSD after trauma.
Translation: oxytocin can make you faint or dissociate when stressed in order to protect your life.
This passage suggests that women who are abused or neglected early in life may become afraid of oxytocin-generating relationships because they’ve been conditions to fear emotional closeness and the perception of safety.
Better oxytocin within your group may make you less accepting of outsiders. Does less oxytocin make you more receptive? Does that explain insular family communities versus urbanite acceptance of foreigners?
Apparently the lonelier you are the harder it is to feel connected to new people you meet.
He’s touch starved.
She feels emotionally abandoned.
He’s burning with unmet desire.
She’s drowning in invisible labor.
This is the fight happening on my timeline right now and in many marriages.
But it’s not a war.
It’s a cry for connection on both sides.
Let’s break it down🧵
Most men stop receiving physical affection after age 12—unless they get it from a romantic partner.
That means for many husbands, the only place they feel physical warmth, comfort, and touch is in bed.
When that touch vanishes, it’s not just about sex.
It’s about survival.
Men are biologically wired for regular sexual release—yes.
But more than that, oxytocin bonding happens through physical contact, cuddling, kissing, and intimacy.
When men go without it, their bodies flood with cortisol, not calm.
It’s fight-or-flight.
It’s chemical starvation.
Your wife doesn’t want sex.
She doesn’t initiate it.
She doesn’t respond when you do.
And you’re stuck wondering what happened to the woman who used to want you.
Let’s talk about what’s really going on (and how to fix it). 🧵
It’s not about your body.
It’s not about her hormones.
It’s not even about her libido.
The real issue is this:
She doesn’t feel safe.
Not physically—emotionally.
And when a woman doesn’t feel emotionally safe, her body shuts down.
She’s not withholding sex to punish you.
She’s not trying to frustrate you.
She’s trying to survive.
If she feels unseen, unheard, emotionally alone, or constantly misunderstood…
Her body responds by pulling back.
It’s a nervous system shutdown, not a rejection.
The wife feels lonely and sad, but the husband has no idea why. They love each other but don't like each other anymore.
This is by far the most common married couple who comes to me for help. And there's a specific reason this is happening.
Here's the reason:
There's a hidden relationship dynamic playing out in about 50% of adults:
Growing up in families that didn't teach the vital skills needed to maintain a functioning romance has led to generations of adults who can't maintain a marriage and make it thrive.
Here's why:
You learn skills by seeing someone else using them or by having someone transmit them to you through experience.
In other words, if your parents didn't have a thriving marriage or raise you to form intentional bonds, how will you know what to do?
You're not broken.
You’re not heartless.
You’re not incapable of love.
You’ve just trained your nervous system to survive, build, and win.
But now you’re winning ALONE.
Let’s talk about why. 🧵
If you’re a high-performing man, your success came by forging extreme mental discipline.
You optimized for logic.
You killed off distraction.
You made pain productive.
And in the process? You overdeveloped your prefrontal cortex and shut down everything soft.
Emotional expression? Suppressed.
Oxytocin bonding? Blocked.
Vulnerability? Filed under “inefficient.”
Not because you're cold.
Because you had to be efficient to build what you’ve built.
But the same survival mode that built your empire?
It’s killing your connection.
You're married.
You love each other.
But lately…
You feel like roommates.
She feels emotionally starved.
He feels physically rejected.
You're both frustrated.
And nobody knows how to fix it.
🧵Let’s talk about what’s really going on:
Your marriage isn’t broken because you stopped loving each other.
It’s stuck in a cycle of survival.
She’s emotionally shut down.
He’s physically shut down.
And both of you are waiting for the other person to make the first move.
For many wives, emotional intimacy is prerequisite to physical intimacy.
She needs to feel safe
She needs to feel seen
She needs to feel emotionally held
Without that? Her body says “no.”
Not out of spite—out of self-protection.
Avoidant men get a bad reputation in relationships—cold, distant, disconnected.
But here’s the truth:
When avoidant men share a clear understanding with you, they often become the most devoted husbands and protective fathers you’ll ever meet.
Here’s how. 🧵👇
Avoidant men aren’t lacking in love.
They’re lacking in clarity, safety, and trust.
Most are desperate to get it right—but they feel like they’re always failing.
That changes when three specific factors are in place. 👇
1) Clear Expectations
Avoidant men fear disappointing their partner. So when expectations are vague, they exaggerate them in their head—and shut down.
They think:
👉 “She wants too much.”
👉 “I can’t win.”
👉 “Better to do nothing than fail.”