"It quickly became apparent that daily, close contact with the data was necessary to understand what states were reporting... At first, we just thought you could pull numbers off dashboards. As it turned out, we actually needed to do deep research.”

Valuable data work lesson 1/ The Data Landscape As March...
"Building automated tooling facilitated our manual data collection and was crucial to our ability to verify data. Ultimately, though, human scrutiny was needed to develop a deep understanding of the data." 2/

covidtracking.com/analysis-updat… What We Learned The COVID T...
"States frequently changed how, what, and where they reported data... Had we set up a fully automated data capture system in March 2020, it would have failed within days." 3/ Throughout the pandemic, CO...While the frustrations of s...
Human eyes on, and heavy use of, data pages and dashboards enabled informed feedback including:
- comments about website accessibility
- requesting more data
- correcting errors the increases resulted from...
Great post about using automation as a way to support and supplement manual work, not to replace it.

By @JonathanGilmou3 about @COVID19Tracking, although I think the lessons apply more broadly 5/

covidtracking.com/analysis-updat…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Thomas

Rachel Thomas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @math_rachel

19 Oct
"The framing of so-called US-China 'AI arms race' is increasingly used to justify expansion of large tech corporations’ AI capabilities, while acting as a defense against critical work calling for restraint, reflection, & regulation of AI tech & firms."

medium.com/@AINowInstitut…
It is critical to hold both Chinese and US actors accountable for the rights violations they perpetuate. Instead, debates around which state’s technologically-mediated harms are “worse” tend to erase efforts to resist technology-related rights violations within China. In this environment, it is critical to hold both Chinese and
"We often see arguments that portray any check on American tech companies as allowing or endorsing China to grow. In this framing, AI (and the Big Tech companies capable of producing it) is conflated with the national security interests of the US." In AI Now’s own work, we take clear positions on regulatio
Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
I just read that masks won't be required in Qld once we hit 80% of eligible vaccinated (64% total population).

I really wish we could tie our public health measures to keeping R < 1, instead of solely to vax rates.
UK has shown the disaster (currently >800 deaths per week) that can result from promising in advance that vaccination alone == return to normal

theguardian.com/world/2021/oct… When the Covid announcements were made, they’d say ‘Very
Also, let's not forget ventilation as a very powerful and under-utilized tool.

Setting incentives based on R<1 would be more motivating to use all our options to get there, not solely vaccines (which are great, but in many places not enough on their own)
Read 4 tweets
14 Oct
Stories like this are sadly common. When MDs discourage everyone else (even STEM PhDs) from reading medical literature, this really does NOT help us create a society with higher scientific & medical literacy.
Problems with "appeal to authority" arguments:
- many ppl are more motivated when they know the underlying reasoning/mechanism/data
- doesn't build underlying scientific knowledge or critical thinking skills
- science is messy & always evolving
- discourage interdisciplinary work
I value interdisciplinary work, which entails encouraging others to learn about your field & engage with it, and recognizing that their other perspectives/skills/domains that can be relevant & shine new light on your area.
Read 4 tweets
14 Oct
It bothers me when doctors, journalists, & others lump together:
- disabled & chronically ill patients who read papers/research their own medical issues AND
- able-bodied anti-vaxxers/conspiracy theorists who use "do your own research" to justify anti-science 1/ #NEISvoid
Patients w/ chronic illnesses & disabilities have 3 types of expertise:
- physical experience of their illness/disability
- how to navigate medical system, which is traumatizing
- in many cases: deep scientific knowledge, from keeping up on relevant research 2/
Able-bodied anti-vaxxer/conspiracy theorists typically don't have any of the above 3 types of expertise, which is why I think we need to draw more careful distinctions when talking about "patients doing their own research" in a derisive way. 3/
Read 8 tweets
13 Oct
It is funny when the "only doctors are allowed to speak about public health" crew suggests I wouldn't want outsiders weighing in on AI, because one of my core values/driving motivations is that I want people from all backgrounds involved with AI & AI ethics 1/ slide saying: ethics issues underscore why we need everyone
Most problems related to AI/automated systems are inherently interdisciplinary, benefiting from having experts from many domains involved, spanning STEM, social sciences, and the humanities.

And those who are most impacted by a system should be centered most. 2/
Too often, there has been unnecessary gatekeeping & credentialism in AI, narrow definitions of who has the "right" background. I talk about this more here, but our vision for fast.ai was a community for ppl w/ the "wrong" backgrounds. 3/

bit.ly/rachel-TEDx slide reading: AI needs more unlikely people
Read 7 tweets
13 Oct
We need more nuanced ways to talk about medical & public health disagreements, without the simplistic black-and-white reductions that you either trust ALL doctors in ALL matters OR you must be anti-science. 1/
"Science is less the parade of decisive blockbuster discoveries that the press often portrays, and more a slow, erratic stumble toward ever less uncertainty." @zeynep 2/

Pundits urge people to “listen to the science,” as if “the science” is a tome of facts and not an amorphous, dynamic entity. @edyong209 3/

Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(