Really exciting talk from @JoelChan86 demonstrates an interface for incrementally generating semi-formal "discourse graphs" (X supports Y, Z informs W) through naturalistic note-taking structures:
The loose structure and incrementalism seem really key!
The loose structure and incrementalism seem really key!
I've been creating these sorts of relationships informally in my own note-writing processes, and it's been really interesting to see synthesis (sometimes) emerge from the noise.
Not yet sure how useful formal structures ("discourse graphs") are, vs. relatively simple queries.
Not yet sure how useful formal structures ("discourse graphs") are, vs. relatively simple queries.
Probably more formal and machine-readable structures are essential if one aspires to network this work across many scholars, as Joel does.
I didn't emphasize this enough: the thing that's so interesting about the approach @JoelChan86's illustrating here is that a semi-structured "discourse graph" emerges *as a byproduct of* normal annotation / note-taking practices. It doesn't demand extra workflows.
This kind of smooth integration and incrementalism seems critical to adoption.
Relatedly: I started writing *way* more SRS prompts ~2 years ago when I integrated them into my note-writing tools (i.e. so that writing prompts wasn't a "separate" workflow).
Relatedly: I started writing *way* more SRS prompts ~2 years ago when I integrated them into my note-writing tools (i.e. so that writing prompts wasn't a "separate" workflow).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
