Worth looking back on how Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Bickert and Clegg misled.... How Facebook is Misleading the Public About Its Role in January 6 techpolicy.press/how-facebook-i…
Add another exec to the list of Facebook executives who set up a false scarecrow to knock down on January 6- of course Facebook is not the "reason" January 6 happened. This is no excuse for the abject failures detailed in these reports. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
Background reading 1: @EvanSelinger and co-author Darin Durrant in the Journal Science as Culture, Amazon's Ring: Surveillance as a Slippery Slope Service tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Interesting. In the $5 billion FTC settlement Facebook arrived at after the Cambridge Analytica scandal one condition was that Zuckerberg not be named.
“There is a big difference between what Facebook should allow and not allow versus what is legally permissible,” said David Brody, Senior Counsel at @LawyersComm. “This is an attempt to spread untruths about the 2020 election.” techpolicy.press/facebook-permi…
“It’s possible this doesn’t technically violate the precise text of Facebook’s narrowly written rules... but it flies in the face of their countless proclamations about their commitments to election integrity" said @accountabletech's @JesseLehrich: techpolicy.press/facebook-permi…
NEW Senate Judiciary majority staff report on efforts by Trump and his allies finds former President arguably committed criminal violations of the Hatch Act in scheme to subvert the election: judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
The first interim finding concerns at least 9 calls with DOJ leaders in which the former President raised false claims or pressured DOJ officials:
White House COS Mark Meadows violated restrictions meant to ensure an independent Department if Justice on multiple occasions: