Is the Elections Bill the end of electoral pacts in Britain? A thread... 🗳️🧵 1/
bestforbritain.org/is_the_electio…
This bill is a ‘once in a generation’ reform of our creaking Victorian elections system. Hidden in the Bill is a measure that takes a bit of explaining, but leads us to believe that on top of everything else, the government is trying to quietly outlaw electoral pacts 2/
For background, our polling from May 21 found 64% of voters say political parties that broadly agree with each other, should work together at election time rather than stand against each other, including 63% of Conservatives and 70% of Labour supporters 3/
bestforbritain.org/proportionalre…
The Political Parties, Elections & Referendums Act 2000 created the system we know today. It invented the Electoral Commission, required parties to be registered & publish annual accounts, set £££ limits for election campaigning & created the concept of third party campaigners 4/
‘Third parties’ basically means any person or organisation that spends over a certain amount on election campaigning, and PPERA set registration requirements, rules about who is and isn’t allowed to spend money on elections and introduced a spending limit for them 5/
Before PPERA, parties were free to spend as much £££ as they liked on national campaigning to promote an electoral pact they'd entered into. Joint candidates are a bit tricky, but not insurmountable - lots of current Labour MPs stand as joint Labour & Co-op candidates 6/
After PPERA political parties had to account for every £ they spent on election campaigning, make sure they didn’t spend over the limit & publish full details after the election. Crucially, it limited political parties to only spending £ on campaigning for their own candidates 7/
But there was a workaround. The Electoral Commission’s current guidance to political parties is to register as a ‘third party’ campaigner in addition to being a political party....(stay with us)...8/
...That way, the party could publish two spending returns that provide voters with transparency over what they spent to get their own candidates elected and, separately, what they spent on joint campaigning with their electoral pact partners 9/
There’s a problem though. By registering twice, the party then technically has two separate spending limits which are additive - that is, it increases the total amount they could legally spend at an election 10/
(If you're still here following this, by the way, we love you politicos)
So the govt says they're using Clause 20 of the new Elections Bill to close that loophole by banning parties from registering as third party campaigners. The Bill also tidies up the rules around ‘joint campaigning’, extending that concept to include political parties as well 11/
But then it misses a step. It doesn’t change the definition of parties’ election campaigning to allow them to spend money promoting other parties’ candidates...12/
...So while third parties can jointly campaign with other third parties and political parties can jointly campaign with third parties, political parties will now have no way to jointly campaign with other political parties 13/
Is this an oversight in the drafting of the Bill? Or is it a deliberate and sneaky attempt to quietly ban electoral pacts? The reality is that only the Conservatives have ever really come close to spending the full UK-wide £19.5m political party spending limit...14/
...the Conservatives spent £18m in 2017 and £16m in 2019. The other parties typically spend significantly less (Labour spent £11m in 2017 and £12m in 2019) 15/
People want less division and more cooperation. They want a fairer voting system which would make it even more important for parties to work together. But the system, and the tribal party politics it fosters, seem determined to forbid us from doing politics by consensus 16/
The bottom line is, if the Elections Bill passes without amending Clause 20 there will no longer be any way for political parties to be transparent about how money is spent on campaigning in an electoral pact 17/
Parties may still decide not to stand candidates in certain constituencies. Leaders could still talk about shared goals and one party could even quote another on their leaflets. But there could be no shared, common plan for how money is spent or targeted to win the election 18/
Yet another barrier to a better, fairer democracy in the UK. The Elections Bill is currently at committee stage - so now is the time to pile on the pressure for the amendments our democracy needs. You can join our campaign & write to your MP here 👇 19/ bestforbritain.org/theelectionsbi…
And if you made it down to here.../ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Best for Britain

Best for Britain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BestForBritain

6 Oct
The most hypocritical speech in history from @BorisJohnson? Here are nine things we spotted...
bestforbritain.org/the_most_hypoc…
🚨1: The PM praised the spirit of our England footballers who made it to a European Final this summer - but he refused to condemn those who booed them for taking the knee. Indeed his Home Secretary accused the lions of gesture politics...
🚨2: Johnson was critical of the UK's low number of rape convictions - but in July he instructed his MPs to vote against introducing minimum sentences for rape, against criminalising street sexual harassment and against making it easier for survivors of rape to testify in court.
Read 10 tweets
29 Sep
Here comes the policy from @Keir_Starmer

"Britain has the worst death toll in Europe. We have lost 133,000 people to Covid. Every one of them someone's mum, dad, sister, brother, friend."

"I know it was difficult. But the situation is worse than it needed to be." 1/
"And it wasn't just a failure of the govt over 18mo - it was a failure over 11 years."

"There are cracks in Britain's society and Covid seeped into them."

"An unfair tax hike that doesn't fix social care or clear the NHS backlog is not a plan." 2/
"There is no doubt that the NHS needs more money. And a Labour government will always fund the NHS properly. But the future can't just be about chasing more demand with more money."

"Today, average life expectancy is 80." This is "the biggest test in the history of the NHS." 3/
Read 19 tweets
28 Sep
“The reality is that it’s always easier to trade with those who are geographically near, that’s how it works.”

"Build on what’s there, repair the holes, be pragmatic, be realistic, be grown up politicians and not dogmatic" - spot on @EmilyThornberry 1/
kelo.com/2021/09/27/eu-…
'Thornberry’s first step would be to strike an agreement with the EU to resolve problems with the transportation of food between Britain and the EU, and Britain and Northern Ireland.'

Absolutely essential this is fixed before full import checks are brought in by UK on 1 Jan. 2/
'A veterinary deal could help rebuild trust with Brussels and open the door to mini agreements on a range of other difficult issues that were delayed or left unresolved by the 2020 deal.'

Exactly what we've heard during @UKTradeBusiness sessions... 3/
Read 5 tweets
30 Aug
Usual trolls have moved on to "WHY DON'T THE UNEMPLOYED DO X JOB?"

An economically illiterate notion. We have around 1m vacancies and about 1.6m unemployed. A supply pool only 40% larger than the demand will never match skills and geography so MAGICALLY as to suffice. 1/4 ~AA
It's also a rotten notion, because it robs anyone currently looking for a job of any agency. It implies an architect in Liverpool, looking for a job in her field, should drop her family, leave her home, abandon her chosen specialty, and go to Norfolk to pick potatoes. 2/4 ~AA
This is not only inhuman and unfair - the reason we all pay National Insurance is precisely that: as insurance. Poor gov't planning and an obsession with exclusing foreigners do not somehow unilaterally change that social contract. 3/4 ~AA
Read 4 tweets
5 Aug
What the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill means for Travellers - a thread 🚨
thebristolcable.org/2021/08/pandem…
🚨People found residing – or intending to reside – on land without consent, in or with a vehicle can be arrested if they refuse, or are unable, to leave.
🚨Police will be able to seize and impound vehicles – which in many people’s cases are also their homes.
Read 8 tweets
29 Jun
WATCH: @PaulBlomfieldMP presses Home Office Minister @kevin_j_foster on the "serious unanswered questions" around the cliff-edge EU Settlement Scheme, warning of "real risk of a new Windrush-type tragedy in the future if we don’t get this right now". Deadline is tomorrow. 1/
.@PaulBlomfieldMP asks Govt to "follow the lead of countries like France & the Netherlands in relation to UK citizens & extend the deadline for applications."

Awareness of scheme is low - 1 in 3 landlords not aware & business groups think employers don’t know enough about it. 2/
Horrendous stats from @PaulBlomfieldMP:
- Up to 130K of those eligible for benefits haven’t applied for settled status
- Applications have been made for only 1 in 3 children in care
- Almost half – about 2m - of those who have applied for settled status haven't received it. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(