A quick thread here on working as an academic in the military. I agree with @CarrieALee1's thread on the upside, in general: The money/benefits are insanely good, no methodological warfare, policy-relevant research, etc.
BUT:
/1
cc @dbyman@notabattlechick@JRHunTx
@CarrieALee1@dbyman@notabattlechick@JRHunTx There are downsides. You are working for people who do not understand education and who are, in the main, suspicious of educators. It's a culture clash that is built-in to the institutions. Many of your superiors have no idea what you do all day and think you're not "working." /2
Although tenure is now spreading to PME (thank heavens), the contract system breeds short-term thinking and a timid faculty that is centered way too much on pushing the right buttons for student evaluations. PME students was *way* overempowed in this regard. /3
PME institutions in general are also heavily dependent on the personality of who is leading them at any given moment: What was okay a year ago is frowned up a year later. Grants? Go get 'em! Later: What, grants? Why would you do that?
/4
My most important advice to PME faculty is to create a career *outside* of your institutions. The demand signal you get from inside the school is: Keep students happy and don't create problems for the person who will run the place for 3 years and then get a star and leave. /5
The institution does not have your career interest at heart; it does not have an interest in developing you as faculty the way a university department will. Thus, you need to be a self-starter in a *big* way to work in PME for the long-term.
/6
In sum, you will make a boatload of cash and have a lot of time, but you will lose a lot of autonomy over what you do at work (curriculum is a problem) and you will work in a place that can be an actually impediment to your overall career if you're not vigilant about it. /7
I have more to say about the pointlessness of things like giving an education in national security to a guy about to retire in a year, or about curricular fads, but that should cover most of it for now. /8x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My former comrades on the right saying that "Because Mitch didn't dump the filibuster in 2017, he never will" are acting as if the past four years didn't happen. So, to use a political science term, let us engage in cutting the shit here for a moment. /1
McConnell and the GOP are without principle; their only principle is power and the expediencies that create power. In 2017, it was not in Mitch's interest to end the filibuster, especially with the risk that the GOP would lose seats in 2018. He knew he might need it. /2
This is the same McConnell whose respect for norms and tradition denied Garland a hearing and rammed through Barrett weeks before an election he knew Trump was likely to lose. He's a master of obstruction and opportunism. So let us cease this nonsense about Mitch's principles. /3
This is a great piece about why nostalgia about that "better time" is bullshit. (Well, it's about more than that.) A few observations, and h/t @RuleandRuin
Why Is Every Young Person in America Watching ‘The Sopranos’?
/1
First, it's a great reflection on how nostalgia runs in regular and stupid cycles. The young people watching The Sopranos are nostalgic watching someone be nostalgic about the period before The Sopranos; nostalgia watching the 2000s while watching someone hating the 2000s. /2
Second, it's a warning that maybe we're now a lot more like Tony than we want to admit. I've said something like this is my recent book about the bored middle-class looking for meaning. That was Tony: Affluent, bored, somewhat self-hating, adrift and depressed. /3
Let us consider for a moment what one of Breitbart's Big Thinkers is admitting 1. Vaccines work 2. Vax resistance is almost entirely partisan 3. Unvaxed people are dying in large numbers
He then gets from this to: THIS IS THE LEFT'S ENTIRE PLAN!
/1
Now, it is *possible* that this is double-triple-reverse pro-vaccine psychology: "They don't REALLY wants us to get vaccinated, so we better do it!"
No one at Breitbart is that smart, so let us consider an alternative explanation.
/2
The more likely explanation is - as it always is - "Look at what you sneering elites made us do."
That way, when people die, it's STILL not their fault, you see. They were bullied into NOT taking the vaccine because they were disrespected or something. So it's on you lefties. /3
Here's what I think - so far - about the Milley business.
- Calls for him to resign are stupid.
- Calls to fire him are stupid.
- The call to China was a *good* thing
- It's a legit question about whether he was preemptively countermanding possible orders from the CINC.
/1
Bad-faith calls from craven opportunists like Rubio mean nothing. And no CJCS has ever had to deal with a mentally ill president who was actively trying to overthrow the constitutional order. But before we cheer any of this, let's remember that everything becomes precedent.
/2
Milley, I think, was trying to steady the ship in case Trump called in some more junior guy and said "Get me Xi on the phone and bring the football." But you don't want it to become a thing where CJCS can say "ignore POTUS orders unless you clear with me." That's dangerous. /3
Few people can write with the same kind of spiritual awareness and kindness of spirit @DavidAFrench brings here. And yet, I am part of the "empathy crisis" he describes. In fact, I am worse: I am past judgment and anger. I have reached indifference, and this, I know, is a sin. /1
@DavidAFrench I feel this enough that I have discussed it with my clergyman. But I also cannot make myself feel something that I cannot feel. I do not gloat or sneer at the deaths of others. What worries me, now, is that these stories have little impact on me. And I am not alone in this. /2
Months of being told "leave me alone" have led me, finally, to cease arguing. I am respecting other adults and fellow citizens in their choices. Yes, I am angry that their choices produce costs on the rest of us, to be sure. But for their illnesses, I am struggling to feel. /3
So, this is a mini-thread about military professors and that disclaimer that some of you heard from Chris Jansing (thank you, @11thHour) about my views being my own. This is a quirky requirement that occurs because Professional Military Ed professors (PME) are USG employees. /1
I am not representing the policy of the Naval War College or any military school here, and none of this will really matter for me personally when I leave Federal service in the spring, but it's helpful to know when you see my PME colleagues in the public space. /2
PME institutions are accredited schools that give accredited degrees. Their civilian faculty, accordingly, must have academic freedom to speak their mind as part of being faculty at actual educational institutions. (Also, they are citizens who have the right to speak!) /3