Israel's Defense Minister designated 6 longstanding, well-respected Palestinian HR orgs as terrorist groups. You'd expect there'd be some due process before an announcement of this sort,or a minimal amount of evidence.
But when it comes to Palestinians, there's apparently no need
And we're not talking about accusations against one or two individuals. Six major organizations, all of whose employees & supporters have been turned overnight into "terrorists", after a decision came into effect w/out even a semblance of a legal process having been carried out.
But that's hardly surprising when the bread & butter of the occupation's legal system is based on arrests w/out warrants and detention w/out trial. Palestinians are seen as ticking bombs from the moment they're born. We're told that due process is a privilege we have no time for.
That's how, for example, "Order 101" came into being in the oPt: A military law declaring that any assembly of 10 or more people in which anything that can be construed as political is said - is an illegal gathering that can be, and often is, violently dispersed by IDF soldiers.
This is a cynical use of the term terror—a very real threat that many of us have painful experience of—cheapened by our government as an excuse to cut down any potential opposition to our absolute control over the territories. Even when that opposition is entirely non-violent.
If Defense Minister Benny Gantz truly believes there's a basis for his accusation against the human rights orgs—now's the time to prove it. It's the bare minimum he can do.
For months now violent settlers have been attacking Palestinians in the West Bank. Almost every week such an incident is caught on camera. And Gantz has chosen to stay silent. But accusing Palestinian HR organizations of terrorist activity? No problem. He doesn't even need proof.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The US deadline to improve humanitarian conditions in northern Gaza has expired, and the IDF's mass bombing and starvation campaign to expel its residents has worsened. The IDF clearly stated - residents won’t be allowed to return
In other words: ethnically cleansing the area 🧵
After the IDF already split Gaza in two with an ever expanding Netzarim corridor (named after a settlement evicted from Gaza in 2005), it built another corridor in the north, cutting Gaza City off from Jabalya, Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahia. A siege within a siege within a siege.
In October the IDF drastically decreased the amount of aid entering northern Gaza, publicly stating none would enter north of Gaza City for over a month. Attempting to justify this to the public, the IDF claimed there were no civilians in the area - a blatant and abhorrent lie.
"You went into Gaza for revenge. As much as possible. Women, children, anyone in sight."
The funeral which sent shockwaves through social media, the jarring quotes that nearly all major Israeli news outlets chose to omit, and what they say about the IDF’s policies on the ground🧵
A recap: IDF reservist Shuvael Ben Natan was killed in Lebanon last week. During his funeral, his brother said he entered Gaza to take revenge on women and children. A fellow soldier said he became the platoon's "jokester" when he torched a house without approval "for the vibes."
These more damning descriptions of Ben Natan oddly didn't make it onto the many Israeli news sites which reported on said funeral. According to @the7i, most Israeli sites which reported on it chose to cut these parts out. One outlet even edited them out of the video completely.
About 100 people were killed on Monday in an IDF strike on Beit Lahia in northern Gaza. The IDF said the building was bombed after 4 soldiers were killed by an IED nearby, and a “lookout” was detected on its roof. A 5-story building, around 200 people - bombed for a “lookout” 🧵
About 20 of those who died in the bombing were children. Dozens were trapped under the rubble, some of whom were taking shelter after being driven out of the bombed areas of Jabaliya and Beit Hanoun. For a lookout. But what does the IDF mean when they say someone is a “lookout”?
A soldier who took part in the 2014 ground invasion of Gaza, told us how two women in an orchard were targeted and killed for allegedly being "lookouts," because they were seen "with cellphones, talking, walking" and it was assumed that they could see the forces.
Yesterday, as thousands were fleeing from northern Gaza under threat of starvation and bombing in what is in all likelihood an implementation of the "Generals' Plan," Netanyahu's Likud Party held a "Gaza resettlement conference" nearby, overlooking the charred houses of Be'eri 🧵
The conference area was designated a “restricted military zone,” and protesters against it, many of whom are the still-displaced residents of Be’eri and families of hostages, were blocked from entering. They want a ceasefire and a hostage deal - that’s why they were pushed aside.
A month ago, Netanyahu said he was considering the Generals’ Plan. A week ago he said the same thing. Between those two statements, were multiple weeks of no food entering northern Gaza, coupled with mass bombings. Now, his party hosts a conference to say out loud what he won’t.
This weekend, the IDF bombed a hospital in Jabalya and a residential complex in Beit Lahia, killing at least 120 in those two strikes alone, including many women and children.
But again, they utter the magic words “precise munitions,” trying to justify another mass killing 🧵
Unsurprisingly though, the dead don’t seem to care how “precise” the weapons were. And while the army may have considered them “acceptable collateral damage,” basic moral norms say otherwise. Especially when the list of “acceptable” targets includes humanitarian safe zones.
For example, let's say the IDF fires a precision missile precisely into the Al-Tabaeen school that houses masses of displaced Gazans, like it did in early August. Was a disaster of over 90 deaths, including children, avoided? No.
Soldiers have been testifying to us for years about the ambiguous and unofficial authority that settlers (mostly Civilian Security Coordinators - CSCs) hold over IDF soldiers. Cementing this authority as official policy is just more proof of our govt's messianic-settler agenda.
"the CSC said, 'I am the commander on the field, I give the orders, when the army arrives I direct it.' The message, at the end of the day, is that during an incident it’s the CSC who directs the army, not the army that directs the CSC"
Hebron area | 2013 breakingthesilence.org.il/testimonies/da…
To learn more about Civilian Security Coordinators and settler influence on our military, our 2017 book "The High Command" is available in full for free here: breakingthesilence.org.il/inside/wp-cont…