London used to be the tech hub of Europe before Brexit (VC investment, # of tech positions, big tech presence etc). I lived/worked there for 5 years and it was great.
Still a good place... but Brexit is making EU engineers explore options outside the UK like this, one at a time:
As someone who has seen London tech at its prime, I think one of the biggest misses of the current UK government is not doing more to "retain" the London tech hub.
Dublin, Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin and other EU "hubs" are slowly, but surely pulling London EU folks away.
My response to "what is your take on choosing the next city?" was this:
"What will the next EU* tech hub be?"
*taking the UK out of EU.
My take: it should have been Paris... if they capitalized on it, and changed a bunch of policies (which they don't and won't).
Amsterdam & Dublin are the biggest winners, and plenty other gainers).
And here's an inbound DM on why Paris (sadly) is a place that will struggle to attract tech talent. Even though it has all many characteristics in location, size, population, transport to be a tech hub.
The language for tech is English, and in Paris you *need* to learn French.
A person weighing in (over a DM that I edited to remove personal details) on Barcelona.
And on how you should expect to (eventually) learn the local language either way. Which I agree with - I'm slowly improving my Dutch as well in Amsterdam.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The brilliance: copyright does not protect derived works. Rewriting TypeScript code in Python means copyright no longer applies.
The scary thing: it can be done in trivial amount of time, with AI agents. This one was done with Codex.
This can be done not just for this specific codebase, but any codebase. So what happens with copyright? Will it evolve with AI, or be stuck pre-AI?
You can imagine Anthropic being in a pickle:
1. Do they just leave this, and look the other way, ignoring that it's not exactly fair to transform their code and leave it up there
2. Do they claim copyright applies... but this could be bad for their own business in much bigger ways: eg imagine regulation coming into play that bans this. Claude Code and other tools would have to refuse this kind of generation. Lawsuits against AI labs could spike etc
So my bet is #1 happens. Not the interest of an AI lab to expand copyright protections to derived work cretated by an LLM...
Eh. I just don’t buy this because I actually understand specific examples all too well:
1. It paints a picture of DoorDash disrupted by vibe coded alternatives. Dude. DoorDash / Uber moat is NOT software!! It’s real-world physical logistics. AI cannot disrupt DD…
2. The example of AI agents disrupting travel agents because AI agents can find cheaper travel deals than what travel agents offer. Also BS!!
I worked at Skyscanner (massive airline + hotel + car rental aggregator.) Travel agents have the most of offering the cheapest tickets / packages already!! Due to their deep integration, social deals.
In a world where AI agents find the cheapest deals: travel agents win, airlines get slightly less direct business!! AI agents go to Skyscanner, find cheapest deal from a travel agent, buy it!!
Then if you made a mistake you have no option to change it lol
So now the examples from two industries I know pretty well thanks to having worked there / been involved in them (travel agents + ridesharing/food delivery) read well but are just BS at the fundamental level… other parts I don’t know well read well…. but what are the chances it’s BS at its core?
Casey’s interaction with the “whistleblower” where he gradually realizes all “evidence” is AI-generated, designed to fool even journalists… then he confronts the faker. Worth the read
We’re entering a time when it’s harder to trust anything online: and surely more people will try to fool journalists with AI-generated “evidence.” In some cases, they will succeed, especially at publications chasing headlines and not doing proper investigation / reporting!
For the last ~20 years, I did most of my coding inside an IDE - the last ~15 with increasingly good autocomplete.
Which is why it’s so weird that I barely opened an IDE the last two weeks, even as I pushed lots of code. I use the CLI, the web and my phone (!!) to prompt code
When I just started out developing I remember being so so so full of ideas that I was coding in my head and wished I could have done programming while commuting / on the bus. With eg a phone. But it was impossible, ofc.
Now it’s possible!! A massive change
I feel we’re in the middle of the biggest dev tooling change happening across the industry - and it’s happening over a few short months. And rapidly spreading everywhere.
Amusing: Google does not allow its devs to use its newly launched IDE, Antigravity, for development.
They can only use an internal version called Jetski: also built by the Antigravity team, with Google-speicfic features (eg monorepo support, docs search etc)
Using Antigravity is specifically disallowed and devs cannot sign up to it with a @google.com work address
The reason for this “ban” is, of course, Google’s “tech island” tech stack: Antigravity is simply not compatible with its monorepo, and not integrated to Google’s custom tooling.
Jetski has all of this - but it's a different product. A bit like Borg vs GCP (most of Google doesn't use GCP!)
Covered a lot more on Google’s unique culture (and how they have probably the most custom tech stack across Big Tech) in this deepdive: newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/google