Chappelle approaching the repeated complaints of an extremely marginalized community with the thoughtfulness and self-reflection of a medieval king petitioned by unruly peasants.
Hopefully none of us would be OK with a comic, even an otherwise marginalized comic (like say a trans comic), even one known for speaking truth to power, deciding for 4 sequential specials to do bits on how they saw the struggle for Black liberation as a "hilarious predicament."
I really don't think Chappelle's problem is that he's being misunderstood.
I think his problem is, he's being understood.
Chappelle isn’t talking about his audience. He’s talking about other people, whom his audience would like permission to dismiss as people deserving to exist, and he gives them that permission. And we get to say that’s harmful. And that is free speech.
Billboards. Road signs. Bumper stickers. The sides of barns. Hire skywriters and publish the things that are going up for a vote every day, and the people who are preventing it from happening.
These Are The Senators Who Refuse To Do Their Jobs
Frame it as what it is, which is refusing to work. Refusing to find solutions to problems. Existing only to prolong suffering. Stealing paychecks and taking bribes.
The far right is mainstream Republicanism and it intends violent suppression of all aspects of free open modern society, and our only real choice is whether we fight them in power or out of power.
When someone is trying to stab you, you don’t get to choose whether or not someone is trying to stab you. Your choice is what to do about it.
Republicans intend harm. It’s not subtle.
Using unfounded conspiratorial claims of pedophilia as a self-justifying rationale for anti-societal, anti-democratic terror also isn't a far-right position, but it is a far-right tactic, and an increasingly prevalent one.
Which means that, if you are Beyond Reproach, you have to close yourself off most especially to perspectives that say "I deserve to live in this world, and you are making that difficult."
*Especially* those perspectives, because they carry a moral imperative. They speak to harm and damage, of injustice, of wrong that requires redress. They force a choice: to listen and change, or to refuse.
Let's take it as a given that billionaires are right, and the reason they have extraordinary wealth is their natural ability to succeed in a merit-based system.
Fine. Good. Take ALL their wealth.
They'll easily make more. Think how much more!
I mean, they are the masters of our meritocracy, right? They're visionaries who can overcome any obstacle, right? Much better than the rest, of far greater worth.
Let them show us how they do it. Start from 0. Wow us.
Think how much more wealth and innovation there'll be!
Think how easy they'll find it, given what masters of our meritocracy they are.
We're giving them a gift: of ennobling hard work. A chance to pull themselves up by the ol' straps.
It's like when Mario gets enough coins the counter resets. It's not theft; it's a free life!
The sheer volume of what should be country-rocking scandals and exposes we’ve had to absorb w/o any consequences at all is mind-boggling, yet there are still complacent liberals out there who think the process is working fine and the problem is the left isn’t voting hard enough.