“Glasgow University accused of undermining academic freedom in 'antisemitic' ruling”.
This is absolutely outrageous, not least because the article in question was rigorous and analytical. Solidarity with Jane Jackman. Academic freedom matters. scotsman.com/education/glas…
This is absolutely outrageous, not least because the article in question was rigorous and analytical. Solidarity with Jane Jackman. Academic freedom matters. scotsman.com/education/glas…
The article in question is here, decide for yourself.
The grim reality is that British universities are increasingly more concerned about media risk management than open and critical inquiry. The same applies with IHRA fundamentalism.
gla.ac.uk/media/Media_79…
The grim reality is that British universities are increasingly more concerned about media risk management than open and critical inquiry. The same applies with IHRA fundamentalism.
gla.ac.uk/media/Media_79…
“this article employs some discursive strategies, including a biased selection of sources as well as the misrepresentation of data, which promote an unfounded antisemitic theory regarding the State of Israel and its activity in the United Kingdom.” Just extraordinary.
This is slander against scholar’s name. Just extraordinary that @UofGlasgow would stoop to this.
As I document here ‘electric fence’ approach of public relations is about intimidating individuals who undertake slightest probing of how occupation works.
As I document here ‘electric fence’ approach of public relations is about intimidating individuals who undertake slightest probing of how occupation works.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
