Everyone should watch this @PamelaBrownCNN interview with outgoing @NIHDirector Francis Collins to see how Collins uses misleading talking points to avoid any acknowledgement NIH was caught completely unaware its grantee was doing risky bat coronavirus research in Wuhan.

Brown repeatedly presses Collins to explain how NIH could not know FOR TWO YEARS that its own contractor @EcoHealthNYC had done research making bat coronaviruses more infectious to humans, and Collins uses every rhetoric trick to dissemble and distract... I'll explain...
Fauci claimed no "Gain of Function research was being funded in Wuhan.

Brown to Collins: “How could [Fauci] say that when you are just now finding out that US taxpayer dollars were being used to pay for this risky research in that Wuhan lab two years ago?" GOOD QUESTION
Collins tries to go down a rabbit hole semantic debate about the definition of gain of function (this is his usual filibuster tactic), but Brown stops him and asks the direct question again:
Brown: “EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms of its contract... So the question is.. How can you know what this money is going toward… in places the Wuhan lab if you are just now finding this out from EcoHealth Alliance, how the US taxpayer dollars were being used?" EXACTLY.
Collins acknowledges EcoHealth violated its contract but then says, weirdly:

"Yes, they did some things they should have told us about, but they did not do the kind of Gain of Function research that requires special, high level oversight." WTAF?
The whole point of the NIH letter to Congress was that if EcoHealth HAD reported its research results, it WOULD HAVE triggered the extra, high level oversight. Why is Collins pretending he knows they would have been exempt from that?


There's more...
Then Collins constructs and attacks a straw man by saying: “This was in no way connected with the advent of SARS-CoV-2."

Brown points out he's refuting an assertion nobody made. She steers the interview back to the issue at hand, why didn't NIH know what they were funding?
Brown: “There was risky research being conducted in that lab with US taxpayer dollars that NIH was unaware of and is just now finding out. So it raises the question of what other risky experiments could be going on with US taxpayer funding that you don't know about." PRECISELY
Collins responds he doesn't think this kind of lax reporting is widespread. "This particular grantee is in trouble for not being completely transparent about the work they were doing and we are very much following up on that.” No specifics.
Brown presses Collins (again) to acknowledge NIH has some responsibility for not knowing it was funding this research: “Isn’t this also an oversight failure of the NIH, because the NIH is responsible for taking taxpayer money and giving these grants." OF COURSE IT IS...
This time, Collins actually blames Congress for preventing NIH from interacting with sub=grantees (the Wuhan lab), completely sidestepping why NIH didn't ask EcoHealth (the primary grantee) for its Wuhan report FOR TWO YEARS, while a pandemic raged coming from Wuhan...
Brown presses Collins to on the core issue:“Why should Americans trust you and the NIH on the issue of covid origins, when you didn’t even know about the programs it was funding with taxpayer dollars in China?" LOGICAL QUESTION
First, Collins basically makes the argument that most of the planes landed safely so nothing to see here:

“Well, that’s a little too strong, Pam... The vast majority of what they did was what we gave them permission to do.”
Then Collins makes what seems to me to be a sexist comment to Brown

“So please, relax here." (seems sexist)

"This is not a circumstance where I think you could say there was a major failure that could put human lives at risk.” (A bold if not misleading assertion)
Brown stands her ground, defends her legitimate and sensible questions:

"It certainly raises questions about transparency and oversight by the NIH of where this grant money goes… Will the NIH now pull funding from EcoHealth Alliance?"
Collins misleads again, saying the EcoHealth funding in Wuhan was cut off (true) but neglecting to mention that NIH and NIAID have awarded EcoHealth Alliance millions more in other contracts since then for other stuff. Some accountability...
This Collins statement struck me as the most audacious:

"The last thing that needs to happen now is any sense that we are not revealing everything that we know.”

NIH is currently ignoring several Congressional requests for information and record about its work in China....
Brown ends with a simple and true statement:

“This is US taxpayer dollars going to risky research and I believe every American deserves to know about it.”



• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Josh Rogin

Josh Rogin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshrogin

14 Oct
New: The Iran deal is dead. Where is Biden’s Plan B? washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… by me @PostOpinions
The Iran nuclear deal is likely dead for good... But if the Biden team has a follow-up plan to prevent Iran from going nuclear, it’s a well-kept secret. And time is not on America’s side.

.@USEnvoyIran @Rob_Malley acknowledged Iran shows no interest in returning to the Vienna talks.

“We have to prepare for a world … where Iran doesn’t have constraints on its nuclear program and we have to consider options for dealing with that..."

Read 6 tweets
16 Sep
New: Milley is neither a traitor nor the savior of the Republic washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… by me @PostOpinions
The truth is more complicated than either Milley’s attackers or defenders admit. First of all, Milley was not freelancing — for the simple reason that the calls were not his idea.

“Milley was absolutely not going rogue."

Esper and Milley had the authority to do what they did. But the White House concern was that they were undermining the White House China team’s messaging and actions vis-a-vis Beijing.

Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
NEW statement from Milley spokesman Col. Dave Butler:

“The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs regularly communicates with Chiefs of Defense across the world, including with China and Russia..."

2/? "...These conversations remain vital to improving mutual understanding of U.S. national security interests, reducing tensions, providing clarity and avoiding unintended consequences or conflict..."
3/? "...His calls with the Chinese and others in October and January were in keeping with these duties and responsibilities conveying reassurance in order to maintain strategic stability..."
Read 7 tweets
31 Aug
NEW: The U.S. government left its own journalists behind in Afghanistan washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… by me @washingtonpost
Over 100 Afghans working for @USAGMgov, @voanews & @RFERL were left behind in Afghanistan with their families, even though they are funded by the U.S. Congress and are targeted by the Taliban. Shameful. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
.@SenatorCardin: “It is disheartening that so many professional journalists employed by American-funded news organizations have now been left behind, with their families... These Afghan allies are among the people most endangered...” washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 7 tweets
25 Aug
BREAKING: @sethmoulton & @RepMeijer flew to Kabul airport today "to conduct oversight on the mission to evacuate Americans and our allies," Moulton's office says in a new statement. They have now left Kabul after several hours on the ground. 1/?
@sethmoulton @RepMeijer "Washington should be ashamed of the position we put our service members in, but they represent the best in America," they said in a joint statement. "These men and women have been run ragged and are still running strong. Their empathy and dedication to duty are truly inspiring."
@sethmoulton @RepMeijer They changed their minds on extending the Aug 31 deadline: "After talking with commanders on the ground and seeing the situation here, it is obvious that because we started the evacuation so late, that no matter what we do, we won’t get everyone out on time, even by Sept 11."
Read 8 tweets
18 Aug
New: Biden must extend his Afghanistan withdrawal deadline — whether the Taliban agrees or not washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… by me @PostOpinions
Biden doesn’t want to abandon his promise to withdraw all U.S. troops by Aug. 31, but nobody believes the mission to save as many of these people as possible will be complete by then. Biden must bite the bullet and extend the mission — washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
.@Malinowski: “Is the U.S. military prepared to stay and hold the airport long enough to complete this mission... There’s just no way humanly possible to do this by August 31. We are talking about tens of thousands of people..."

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!