A history professor at a tweeted criticism of VP Pence and university leadership pandemic response.
Elected officials and Fox News expressed outrage.
The College President promised to "deal with it."
Then she was fired.
(via @TheFIREorg) thefire.org/lawsuit-fired-…
Willing to wager that a faculty fired because for speech that offended local politicians will receive only a fraction of the coverage of the faculty whose invite to MIT was rescinded. Both are bad, but the more serious attack on academic freedom will get less attention.
Campus Reform, College Fix, YAF and Fox routinely target faculty for their social commentary every day, hoping to create enough pressure to silence them. It has become a professional hazard. Lets be honest that these orgs don't care about free speech or cancel culture.
Wish I could say this was the first time I encountered an elected official who presented himself as a champion of free speech while also seeking to get faculty fired for speech they disagree with.
Let's assume that both heavy handed bureaucratic response to a law school student at Yale is bad, and so is the violation of first amendment rights leading to the firing of a professor. Why will one of these get so much more attention?
New from me: Administrative burdens are bad for your health.
We spend a lot of time dealing with health care paperwork hassles. A new wave of research shows how that leads to more psychological costs and less health care.
The $22 billion we spend on health care hassles is only a measure of the direct cost of our time. The resulting stress and frustrations lead to another $26 billion in workplace absences, and productivity losses of about $96 billion. 3/ journals.aom.org/doi/epub/10.54…
One of the things I liked about @RottenInDenmark’s piece is his dissection of the casual tendency to compare Mao’s cultural revolution to any sort of perceived trend you disagree with. Because people do this way too much. michaelhobbes.substack.com/p/moral-panic-…
Hobbes was talking about Applebaum's piece, Friersdorf was defending Weiss. It's almost like a class of commentator who knows that Nazi comparisons won't fly, but think Stalinist or Maoist comparisons will. Andrew Sullivan is a serial offender here.
Its the "Stop comparing disagreements about campus politics to a brutal totalitarian regime" challenge
You've seen the bad vax mandate headlines, the ones the emphasize the people who left even though 99% complied.
I wrote about the cognitive biases and partisan incentives behind these headlines.
Please share & consider subscribing to the free newsletter. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/what-explain…
One thing I want to do with my blog is connect research with the real world. Once you understand denominator neglect then you understand the misleading effect of headlines that emphasize those who quit rather retain those who comply with mandates.
Stories of the rare resisters frame how we think about successful vaccine mandates.
Research by @AsmusOlsen shows that while people say they prefer statistical data to make health decisions, in reality they find anecdotes more memorable and compelling. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/what-explain…
As a Packers fan, Rodgers telling Bears fans that he owned them was funny. Bears fans calling it disrespectful is not "woke culture."
Mostly what this shows is the success in rebranding "woke" to mean "anyone disagreeing with me" thepostmillennial.com/aaron-rodgers-…
Its worth looking at the origins of the term "woke" - from Black culture, specifically about social justice - to fully appreciate how successful that negative rebranding has been. theconversation.com/where-woke-cam…
This rebranding didn't happen organically - conservative intellectuals reframed a perspective coming from Black culture as dangerous - a "woke mob" threatening you - and civilization! donmoynihan.substack.com/p/bullshit-bra…
The attack on school officials is very much a partisan effort by the Republican Party to energeize their base nytimes.com/2021/10/21/us/…
The WI GOP candidate for Governor is directing money to school board recall elections to help her chances, and recall candidates are getting coaching from a familiar set of GOP-aligned organizations
Two other recurring patterns:
*person really mad about public school has her kid in private schools
*was drawn into school politics by COVID politics
Longer thread here on this case. Some of the examples we are seeing fit with a pattern of red scare McCarthyism. Someone alleges CRT and that person loses their job without presentation of evidence.
The anti-CRT laws were built on pretty thin evidence but have real consequences for school officials. Stopping their spread means tallying up those consequences and presenting them in an accessible way to the public. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/making-publi…