Should we all get a vaccine booster (3rd dose)?
New preprint w @billy_gardner_ , we examine impact of 3rd doses on key topic: transmission. medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
tl;dr 3rd dose could significantly reduce Rt & stop some surges, but doses should 1st go to unvaccinated if possible
Background
COVID-19 vaccines are fantastic. Better than we could have imagined. mRNA vaccines had efficacy of ~95% for symptomatic disease & even better for severe disease & death. But there's now strong evidence that protection against mild disease & infection is waning a bit.
Here's one study from the UK (there are many others) showing a reduction for Pfizer &Astrazeneca. doi.org/10.1101/2021.0…
Thankfully, waning of protection against severe disease has been much less. Here's a thread reviewing many studies that show this:
Fig from same paper as above (doi.org/10.1101/2021.0…) shows slight waning but still very high protection.
So why all the talk about the need for vaccine boosters?
Why did Biden say we'd all get vaccine boosters after 6 months? Why did FDA & CDC recommend them for 65+, underlying medical conditions & those in high risk settings (cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…).
A couple reasons.
First, there is plenty of evidence that protection, even against severe disease, has waned more in older and ill individuals. e.g. doi.org/10.1101/2021.0…
Second, even mild COVID-19 disease may have long-term consequences. #LongCovid, although the frequency & severity of LongCovid cases in vaccinated individuals that get mild infections is still uncertain.
Regardless, this means protection against even mild disease is important.
So why is there pushback against vaccine boosters? Recent article @apoorva_nyc: some MDs aren't as supportive of boosters as broad recent CDC recommendations. nytimes.com/2021/10/25/hea…
Two big reasons: 1) Global vaccine equity: Many populations, especially in Africa, have received no vaccines, so boosting protection a little in rich countries, while millions have no protection is morally wrong. 2) Recommending boosters could reduce confidence in vaccines.
I'm a strong supporter of vaccine equity & COVAX (who.int/initiatives/ac…) & I'd bet almost 100% of epidemiologists (including me) would prefer to give doses to unvaccinated before giving boosters.
However, if sufficient doses were available, a very important question is: what would the impact of boosters be on transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Could boosters reduce transmission enough to prevent a winter surge? That's the Q our paper addresses.
To do so, we had to estimate vaccine protection against against all infections & transmission with waning & boosting. The data to do so directly don't yet exist.
However, early paper showed antibody titers predict protection v disease. doi.org/10.1038/s41591…
We extended this work by gathering many additional studies on protection against both symptomatic infection & all (but not "any") infections for both Delta & non-Delta variants. Each point is a vaccine-variant study & filled symbols aggregate data for a vaccine-variant.
The relationship b/w protection against infection & neutralizing antibody levels (relative to convalescent sera) was strong, although data for Delta were limited to a few vaccines studied in rich countries (Pfizer, Astrazeneca). Protection was higher vs disease than infection.
We used relationship for protection against all infections for Delta (red line) + very limited study of minimum protection against transmission given infection (doi.org/10.1101/2021.0…) to estimate impacts of boosting on transmission via the pathogen reproductive number, Rt.
We considered 5 several scenarios that varied vaccine coverage, fraction previously infected, & contact rates (which scale R0 & Rt) which roughly describe, using mid-October data: USA, CA, New Zealand w/ summer surge 2021 (R0=~3.7) or pre-pandemic contact rates (R0=~7).
To take into account past vaccinations & infections, we had to estimate waning of protection based on patterns of waning of antibody levels for Pfizer, Moderna, previous infection & hybrid immunity & time series of infections & vaccinations by vaccine type.
We find:
Boosting could substantially reduce Rt, 21%-66%, with larger impacts for higher vaccine coverage & contact rates & smaller fraction previously infected.
Specifically
1)red line: boosting all US currently vaccinated could stop winter surge but only w/ lower contact rates
2) If contact rates return to pre-pandemic levels, need very high vaccine coverage (100%) & 25% boosted to prevent surge (yellow line). w/ current US vaccine coverage (56%) & estimated previous infection (56.4%) Rt remains far above one even if we boost everyone (green line).
3) Places like Calif. (blue line), possibly UK (couldn't find good data on fraction previously infected - help!), could prevent surge w/ some boosting. Australia & New Zealand at risk of very high Rt b/c almost no protection from previous infection. Need to vaccinate fast!
Finally, as expected, using 3rd doses to vaccinate unvaccinated is much more effective. Black dot shows Rt if all 3rd doses used at right end of green line were instead given to unvaccinated (2 shots each) to push coverage 56->84%. Much better, if it could be done.
Conclusions
-3rd dose substantially increases VE vs infection & transmission
-3rd doses could substantially reduce transmission & stop winter surge, but not w/ pre-pandemic behavior unless vacc coverage or prev infection high (~100%)
-doses (always) best used for unvaccinated
Many caveats
Indirect measure of protection (no T-cells!)
Limited data esp. for transmission
No age-specific analysis
V. simple model: assume well-mixed pop for Rt
Didn't incorporate uncertainty in waning for Rt CIs (yet)
Late addition (not yet in paper):
We can use relationship in paper to estimate (HUGE) benefit of getting vaccinated if you've been previously infected:
Protection vs infection increases from 62% -> 91%
Reduced chance of transmitting if infected:
12.5% ->76%
Get vaccinated!!!
Add. caveat: @michaelmina_lab has noted that a sharp increase in antibodies following vaccination often wanes quickly. Unfortunately, we currently don't know how long boosting will last. Have I missed a study from Israel or elsewhere? @florian_krammer@profshanecrotty@roby_bhatt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How to mislead in science: hide raw data in supp material (SM).
Just had a dept-wide reading group of a recent Science paper on latitudinal/temperature trends in predation pressure (10.1126/science.abc4916). Paper claims simple clean patterns (fig) but where are the data???
Panel A (L) in main text. Raw data & regional analysis in SM. Paper makes simplistic & general claim: predation increases w/ Temp. But data tell v different story. Instead of clear increase in Bait Consumption w/ Temp, pattern is absent in 2/4 region, strong in 1/4, weak in 1/4.
Same for Fig 2B. Fig in main text (L) shows clean pattern. Actual data (R) show that pattern is mostly just in 1 type of animal (solitary tunicates) while other taxa show opposite pattern (Enc Bryozoans) or no pattern at all (most other taxa).
COVID-19 vs Shark attack
There was a shark attack yesterday where I free dive frequently (abc7news.com/lovers-point-b…). A friend asked what's more dangerous, COVID-19 or swimming/free diving with sharks in the ocean?
Just for fun, here's a rough calculation.
tl;dr COVID-19 by a mile.
Chance of COVID-19 infection? Depends on many things: occupation, household size, behavior, exposure of household members etc. But in US roughly 60% of US has been exposed in last 2 years (webmd.com/lung/news/2022…). So crude estimate of yearly chance of infection 37%.
Chance of COVID-19 death given infection? Depends on age; for me, about 0.72%, pre-vaccination for the original SARS-CoV-2 variant.
So chance of infection & death ~1 in 375 pre-vaccination and 10-50x lower now (variant, vaccine doses, time since booster) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Why would Amazon workers vote against union & why aren't union dues progressive like taxes (i.e. lowest for lowest income)?
I've read several stories (nytimes.com/2022/05/02/tec…) about workers at 2nd Staten Island plant voting strongly against union but none of the articles say why.
Union dues would be $5/week for full time employees (amazonlaborunion.org), so if earning $15/hr, this is 0.33 hrs/week or 0.8% of salary which seems pretty cheap, & is even less than some large unions (e.g. Teamsters = 2.5 hr/mo or ~0.55hr/wk).
If union negotiated a 1% increase in pay that'd pay for union dues. That seems like a pretty low bar for a goal & doesn't include negotiating for better working conditions, etc. What are other reasons not to unionize or is it simply b/c of known cost & unknown benefits?
Florida Manatees: doomed to extinction or actually doing pretty well?
A simple data analysis story.
Some of you may have seen this article in NYTimes 10d ago: nytimes.com/2022/04/09/us/…
The article suggests Florida manatees are on their way out with quotes like this:
The perilous status of manatees is supported by claims like:
"In all of last year, 1,100 Florida manatees died, a record."
The article does acknowledge in some places manatees are doing better. But the overall tone is one of despair for a species on its way to extinction.
#epitwitter
Need help w/ UK seroprevalence data
I recall previously seeing estimates of for SARS-CoV-2 infection for UK, but now I can only find estimates for exposure to spike protein which is infection OR vaccination (fig from ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…)
but...
I want seroprevalence for infection so need data on antibodies to nucleocapsid protein or other non-spike protein. Does this exist?
I also can't find info on the response rate for survey. This page has response rates, but they are old (from July 2020) & they are very low (<15%). What is current response rate for serosurvey? ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
US COVID-19 deaths US >2000/day & continue to rise.
I can't help but wonder if focus on Omicron's mildness contributed to size of surge & deaths occurring now.
Difference in severity was small relative to higher infectiousness. Latter should have been singular focus of messaging.
Obviously it would have been far worse if omicron had been as severe as Delta. But focus on mildness of Omicron by scientists, media, government, CDC, etc. contributed to people being less safe than they should have & now thousands are dying/day & many more w/ long covid
Biggest failure, in my opinion, was lackluster efforts to roll out 3rd dose boosters, which played huge role in much smaller impact of Omicron on deaths in UK & elsewhere.
In US, many scientists argued against need for boosters, possibly b/c of global vaccine equity issues.